User talk:EAndrewL

Welcome!
Hello, EAndrewL, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Exhibition On Screen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Exhibition On Screen


A tag has been placed on Draft:Exhibition On Screen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, EAndrewL. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:57, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Additionally, it is fairly obvious that this is a second account registered to evade the block on User:ExhibitionOnScreen, which is itself a policy violation. You should stop using this account, go back to your original account, and follow the process to get it unblock and renamed. MrOllie (talk) 12:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Mr. Ollie,
 * I believe I already disclosed I do work for seventh art when I had a pop up asking me to disclose this. The changes made to the Phil Grabsky page were adding citations that were requested of external sources and adding these only on the information that was already there. All the best. EAndrewL (talk) 13:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You added a bunch of unreliable sources that don't help the situation at all - and you must stop evading your block. Even after you get that addressed, you must stop abusing Wikipedia to promote your employer. MrOllie (talk) 13:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because this account exists for the purpose of editing in a promotional manner on behalf of a business or a person connected to that business, and because the account has been used to evade a block on another account. (Whether the two accounts have been operated by the same person or by different people editing for the same business is immaterial.) This is at least the third account which has been created for the sole purpose of making promotional edits for the same business or person. If it continues, the article on that person can be protected from editing, and any website to which links have been posted can be added to the spam blacklist, which will mean that the mediawiki software will prevent anyone from ever posting links to that website. However, I hope that you won't choose to make that necessary, as it could cause inconvenience for some legitimate editors as well as stopping your spamming. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. JBW (talk) 21:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I'm concerned about your comment "I won't continue to edit these page via this account" - do you have another account? While you are blocked, you are not permitted to edit using any account. PhilKnight (talk) 16:57, 2 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Apologies PhilKnight, I should have been clearer. I meant I have another account I initially intended to make these edits on that was banned (I didn’t realise this was against the rules and I’ll put my hands up and apologise to that) but when I was trying to appeal that block/ban and asked some similar points to the above I was ignored so I attempted to be impartial and add other external secondary sources to the posts, learning from those mistakes which I’d argue I did by trying to find the best and clearest sources for the citation that were flagged as needed. EAndrewL (talk) 17:50, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Apologies PhilKnight, I should have been clearer. I meant I have another account I initially intended to make these edits on that was banned (I didn’t realise this was against the rules and I’ll put my hands up and apologise to that) but when I was trying to appeal that block/ban and asked some similar points to the above I was ignored so I attempted to be impartial and add other external secondary sources to the posts, learning from those mistakes which I’d argue I did by trying to find the best and clearest sources for the citation that were flagged as needed. EAndrewL (talk) 09:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)