User talk:ECTP-CEU

Welcome
Hello, ECTP-CEU, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! ELEKHHT 11:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

ECTP-CEU
Thanks for trying to improve the ECTP-CEU article. I reverted your edits because they appeared to mirror the official website, rather than provide a neutral encyclopaedic summary of the subject. Before editing the article please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, in particular: WP:COI, WP:NPOV, WP:RS and WP:NOT. -- ELEKHHT 11:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear Elekhh,
 * Can we please discuss this by email.
 * I have now just lost hours of good work updating the information.
 * The info present previously was outdated.
 * Please let's at least talk about it !


 * Regards
 * Julian
 * Secretary ECTP-CEU
 * Dear Julian, I'm also spending hours of unpaid work. Of course everything can be discussed, and that is usually done on the article's talk page. Your work is not lost as all of it is recoverable. You'll note that in the meanwhile I also updated the awards and members section. But please take the time to read the pages I linked to above, because those will help you contribute to the article in a way that will be longer lasting and useful. -- ELEKHHT 13:30, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear Elekhh,
 * I hope this is the right place to answer.
 * Our exclusive intention is to have neutral, but updated information.
 * I have now seen the mentioned pages, and yes, I understand better.
 * I think the best is that I go back to my review and "strip it down" to it's minimal info, bearing in mind possible conflicts :::etc. I would then post it. I prefer your green light first so you dont have the impression I am ignoring your justified comments.
 * Tnx for the Awards and members. I will correct the awards, two editions are missing.
 * Kind regards
 * julian ECTP-CEU (talk) 14:19, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for learning fast: signature is already working, for indents see WP:THREAD. I'd suggest that best is if you proceed in small steps (paragraphs), each time providing a descriptive edit summary. That way other editors can understand what you are trying to do and help you by improving or correcting single edits without the need for extensive revert/roll-back. Note that lists like the award section should be in chronologic order per WP:MOS. If you are unsure of anything, please ask first on the article's talk page before editing the article. -- ELEKHHT 14:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Dear Elekhh, I have made a new update of the text, endeavoring to make it as limited as possible. We have made sure to only change factual - and keeping in line with the "neutral encyclopaedic" aspect.
 * Thanks so much for your time & advice - kindest regards - Julian ECTP-CEU (talk) 10:24, 3 July 2014 (UTC)