User talk:EDJO97

Welcome


Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.


 * Main Introduction — What is Wikipedia?
 * The Five Pillars — What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
 * Quick Introductions to:
 * Policies and guidelines — How does Wikipedia actually work?
 * Talk pages — How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
 * Referencing — How do I add sources to articles?
 * Uploading images — How do I add and use images?
 * Navigating Wikipedia — How do I find my way around?


 * What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?

 * If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
 * If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
 * If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
 * For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

WHINSEC
Dear EDJO97, will you please refrain from removing information about the School of the Americas on the WHINSEC page? As User:Wikidemon asserted in an edit comment, it is well established that WHINSEC is the direct successor to the SoA, so its history should be covered in the article and summarized in the lead.

I also removed some of your edits regarding protests, since they seems to contain OR. Also, please avoid terms like "our hemisphere" to achieve a worldwide viewpoint. Qwertyus (talk) 17:40, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Funny - so the only valid point is yours and QWERTYUS? Very much a intelectual dictatorship here. By Spinning the facts, you diminish your credibility. I could care less about official, I do care about facts. and If the WIKI project is to be a success, we need to hang on to truth and not hidden agendas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDJO97 (talk • contribs) 20:01, 7 May 2013‎ (UTC)
 * You were not blocked by Qwertyus, and I have no idea what Qwertyus' opinion is about anything. The comments I reproduced (which you had deleted along with the block notice) were from the blocking admin, User:JamesBWatson. I have no comment to make about the content disagreement - but prolonged edit warring is not acceptable, regardless of whether you are right or wrong about the content, and you will need to address that if you want an early unblock. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the insight - But how do I go by adressing it? I came across the page doing an investigation for a political science paper - it dawn on me to do more research, so I did. What I have found out is that the paper is extremely biased against the school. If it were a tad more balanced, I would have no issues - but this is WIKIPEDIA, every one uses it for reference. Unbalanced pages, are like watching Fox news. I was just trying to make the page better ( Official or Partial, are two things that should not be in these pages...correct? )
 * Discussion on the article talk page and consensus is the way to go, and if that doesn't work you should try the steps described at WP:DR. If you post another unblock request agreeing to do that and to not engage in any further edit warring, another admin will review it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)