User talk:EDV1969

Royal Netherlands Air Force
Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Royal Netherlands Air Force article. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources. The UAV source doesn't justify the additional changes – Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * NOTE the source for the UAV is fine, but the rest of you change(s) are not for various reasons - FOX 52 (talk) 18:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * FOX 52, thanks for your reply acknowledging the reliability of the sources and as such your motivation for the undo is not valid anymore, it appears you do not accept improvements in consistency or additional information as your personal preferences need to prevail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EDV1969 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)

Disruptive edits
 PLEASE STOP  - Once again statements like "Will be replaced by" or "Fully operational by" are events that can change, Wikipedia is no place for possible future events WP:NOTNEWS. Do you not have an understanding of the English language, or the instructions I have laid out for you? Now your edits are starting to appear disruptive, and If you continue these disruptive actions you may be permanently blocked from editing - FOX 52 (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


 * BTW deleting this is not going to change anything FOX 52 (talk) 01:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

February 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Azul Brazilian Airlines, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 19:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Azul Brazilian Airlines, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 19:15, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jetstreamer; Evidence and sources have been provided to you

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on German Air Force. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FOX 52 (talk) 02:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Hi FOX 52, initiating this warning as a defensive measure to mask your own 'editing' behaviour should be under review as well, my motivation is sound contributing to Wikipedia, no personal preferences and based on facts. Will reconsider my participation based on this as are many other who have approached my based on edit-history, sorry to all! To be more specific: http://www.baainbw.de/portal/poc/baain?uri=ci:bw.baain.aktuell.allena&de.conet.contentintegrator.portlet.current.id=01DB023000000001|BBPD5U465DIBR

June 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass other editors, as you did at User talk:FOX 52. BilCat (talk) 18:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi BilCat, that's fast after posting as I am about to find out how to report 'edit war behaviour' which I observed according to contributing- & respecting Wikipedia's guidelines in good fait, especially as I am trying to get this resolved but I can't neglect the facts!


 * Beware the boomerang. BilCat (talk) 18:52, 4 June 2021 (UTC)