User talk:EGL1234

Feel free to talk to me below. My User Page

ARCHIVES
An archive contains 50 messages, then it is deemed full. Please note that I am quite strict regarding archiving. :) If a conversation is over, I will archive it ASAP.
 * Archive 1

Block reinstated

 * Dedpite being blocked, you have once again created an  an unauthorized and undisclosed bot account that caused enough disruption to be brought to ANI. This is not an acceptable use of multiple accounts.--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:31, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Additional accounts created unnecessarily of which only two were disclosed:, and .--  Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi. I forgot about Butler and mlwr, but the edits were a test to see whether wikipedia would pick up on it. Additionally, it was not editing any pages apart from its own sandbox. Please unblock me. Thank you.  EGL 1234 02:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I wasn't aware that there was that rule in place. I am quite unexperienced after all. But how can I convince you that I won't sockpuppet again? How can anyone truly prove that they won't do anything again? Also, I stated that if I do it again, you can block me without any retaliation. Also, even if you aren't convinced to unblock me, please could you maybe inform me why you think that there was damage done, as I just simply don't understand. Finally, even if you don't want to do that (which I imagine you won't), please could you maybe shorten my block from indefinite to 1-2 years or something, because I really don't want to be doomed to loss of editing privileges just because I didn't understand a couple rules. Being able to edit and help revert vandalism really means so much to me. Sorry for wasting your time, EGL1234.
 * You are free to make a new unblock request. The big problem here is that you were given a second chance and continued to create sockpuppet accounts. We extended you the benefit of the doubt, you appealed to ArbCom successfully back in January, and then created more sockpuppet accounts and caused more disruption. If you make a new unblock request, a different administrator will review it. --Yamla (talk) 11:24, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much. Would you recommend me taking a break before re-appealing, or doing it now? Thanks  EGL 1234 11:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Well, WP:SO has a lower bar. That requires you go six months with zero edits. Your call. --Yamla (talk) 11:30, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Roberto Innocenti moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Roberto Innocenti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Please also see WP:CIT and WP:CITE for what needs to be included in footnotes in order to pass WP:VERIFY. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:38, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Roberto Innocenti


Hello, EGL1234. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Roberto Innocenti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

As a checkuser, I see block evasion as  in August. Note none of that user's edits made it through the edit filter, but you can see the attempts here. It's not immediately clear to me if this is the same person behind both accounts, so this should be evaluated on behavioural grounds. --Yamla (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * This isn't me btw but be free to check it out! I understand that you probably have to do a lot of checks first. Thanks for seeing my appeal!  EGL 1234 14:03, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Yamla It also may appear to be me, as I frequently edit on College / public wifi.  EGL 1234 01:40, 28 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Without regard to other reasons that may apply against unblocking EGL, especially that of "once bitten, twice shy" when it comes to unblocks, I don't believe the possible sock matches this editor using behavioural review. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:51, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm glad someone checked out the potential sockpuppetry!  EGL 1234 09:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)