User talk:EHMADUDE123

September 2017
Hello, I'm Dsprc. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sikhism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- dsprc   [talk]  21:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sikhism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sikhism, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sikhism. GABgab 22:15, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GABgab 22:19, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

unblock me
EHMADUDE123 (talk) 22:27, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Non-admin comment: Hi, whether you wrote nice things or not it was still vandalism, plus as Huon pointed out you didn't write 'nice' things, anyway the point is that you need to address the reason as to why you were blocked in the first place, and until you do you will remain blocked. Hope this helps. Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 14:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)