User talk:EISNERS

August 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Leviathan (book), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. The addition to Leviathan book was of Thomas Hobbes himself noting ecclesiatical and civil constructions dating back to 1651... but I will use the sandbox as suggested. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  RJC  Talk Contribs 07:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amity. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  RJC  TalkContribs 07:37, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK  14:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC) <!AMITY is of treaty and I found a legal reference to the AMICUS CURIAE brief of the USA at 264 F. 276, 279

the INTERNET has offered an elaboration on phenomenology and hermeneutics I did not mean to add to an article of the Wikipedia that would detract from the usefulness of each the numerous individuals elaborating upon content and in the case of AMITY I found additional treaties that were not listed thinking to add the information... how the added information was construed as vandalism is not of my understanding... I would like to be unblocked in order to add TREATY information to an article of two... the treaty information available online but not yet added to the Wikipedia encylopedia
 * unblock| 64 N.Y.S. 2d 510, 512 = rationale