User talk:EJS524

Orphaned non-free image File:DanReynoldsID.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DanReynoldsID.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Revert
A reason was given for my revert you undid here. Why did you revert?  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
Hello, I'm Hayman30. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Next to Me (Imagine Dragons song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 02:59, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Steven Universe episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. --  Alex TW 00:25, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of Steven Universe episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --  Alex TW 06:27, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes. --  Alex TW 23:09, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Soft pop (talk) 15:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to List of Steven Universe episodes, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. --  Alex TW 00:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at List of Steven Universe episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --  Alex TW 00:39, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --  Alex TW 00:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Edit warring at List of Steven Universe episodes
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * It's unfortunate that I need to bother you, but directly post-ban, the editor has continued their warring with yet more reverts, despite my having contributed to the talk page twice since, with still no apparent desire from this editor to contribute. The edit summary of the first revert also indicates that they have actually read my message on the talk page, directly referencing how I provided The Futon Critic as a source. Should I file another report, or can you file another ban? Cheers. --  Alex TW 05:11, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello User:EJS524. Can you explain why you shouldn't be blocked again, for a longer time? You continue to revert, but you have never used the article talk page to get support for your position. EdJohnston (talk) 05:22, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hello, EdJohnston. I apologize for all of this. First, while I am familiar to editing Wikipedia, I am highly unfamiliar with how to use the talk page. That is why I never use it, I am trying to acquaint myself to it now as I type this out. I know that's not an excuse, but I felt that I should let you know that. I have changed the page back and will wait to change it again (if needed) when the episode gets closer to airing on television. I will be sure to be more responsible while editing on Wikipedia. Thank you, EJS524.
 * You seemed to have worked out how to use it now - surely you could have done that days ago when you were told to, and most definitely after your block was released instead of reverting multiple times? --  Alex TW 15:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * That was a mistake on my part. I should have made more of an effort to try and figure out the talk page rather than just go ahead and change everything. Everything on the page is back to the way it was, and I will only change it again if necessary when there is more of an official source confirming that it is the equivalent of four eleven minute episodes. Again, I apologize, and I will be sure to be more responsible editing in the future. -EJS524
 * All good. As long as the editor war doesn't continue, and you contribute to the Steven Universe talk page, everyone will be happy. Cheers. --  Alex TW 23:33, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Firefangledfeathers. I noticed that you recently removed content from Steven Universe without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Firefangledfeathers (talk | contribs) 13:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)