User talk:ELIYAHO

{hangon}This is strictly a valuable educational article that provides insights on a topic where a lot of confusion is present. In no way, does this article come even close to any advertising for any company, product, group, service or person. As a matter of fact, all the various competing certification entities or interests have been fairly and objectively covered. The article actually reports on the strengths of all main competing organizations. The article is so objective and impartial that one may wonder whether the person who coded this as "advertising" may very well be motivated by a desire to promote one entity above another; something that is the very contrary to this article.

Spam in TOMATIS method
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on TOMATIS method, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because TOMATIS method is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting TOMATIS method, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 18:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

TOMATIS method
The issue mainly is that it does not read like an encyclopedia article, more like a journal article. See what wikipedia is not, and The manual of Style. Also read up on the Criteria for Speedy Deletion. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)