User talk:EMIN365519

December 2018
Hi, EMIN365519! I just had to revert your edit on Daegu, but because it was your first edit I decided to come over to your talk page and explain myself a bit further. (Edit summaries can be so cold, short, and difficult to find) I had to remove your edition, because it read like an essay instead of a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia is not a place for proposing theories or solutions to political situations around the world, nor is it a place for opinions. Arguing that certain political events occurred because of certain presidency is an example of this. (See WP:NOTOPINION and WP:NOTESSAY) It's also an example of Original Research, which is banned. Editors aren't allowed to take facts and draw conclusions from them, then insert those conclusions into articles. For more about that, you can read about it WP:OR You put a lot of work behind your writing, that's clear, so hopefully you will use that skill to work on this article in the future! Also, Wikipedia has its own way of citing materials that takes a while to get used to. You can find a lot of help about it at WP:REFB. It takes a while to get used to, but the most important thing is the references exists and you cite it and if you cite it correctly then that's even better. If you have any other questions, you can ask me but you might have a lot more luck at the Teahouse. It's a place where new editors can go get help from even more experienced editors. If you disagree with what I did, that's fine too, but if that's the case then you can just let me know and we'll start a conversation about it over at Daegu's talk page. Getting your edit reverted can feel disheartening, especially as it's your first, but I don't doubt at all that you could be a valued contributor to this project. I hope you have a lovely day, and I look forward to seeing you around in the future! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 01:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)