User talk:EMwiki9

EMwiki9, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Speedy deletion nomination of Vartak Nagar
Hello EMwiki9,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vartak Nagar for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 13:04, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Promotion
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote anything, as you did with Vartak Nagar. A brief, neutral plot summary is appropriate, but an extended plot summary with promotional language such as "The film is an entertaining roller coaster ride and promises to help us relive our carefree childhood" is not appropriate. Also, the "takes" section (opinions of the various involved actors, writers and directors) is completely inapproprate. A cited quote giving the writer's or director's vision might be allowable, but uncited quotes from all involved people is just more promotion. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Siddharth Kannan. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:53, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Siddharth Mallya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Your edit of 12:26, 21 April 2015‎ (UTC) changed the titles of several cited sources to something different from what the sources actually said. That is highly inappropriate. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:40, 27 July 2015 (UTC)