User talk:ENGW3307/Aquatic invasive species in Canada

Hey, I'm here for a longer peer review of what you have done. My first thoughts after comparing the article before and after you edited it is that you added a ton of useful information. Not only did you expand upon sections, but you also added some new species. I think the additional sentences in the introduction were helpful because they set the tone of the rest of the article. I agree that deleting the species at risk section makes sense, and I think they way you just went in and listed different species is a lot clearer. You added plenty of references as well. I don't have any major comments on things you may fix. However, I do think that adding the external links back is a good point. You don't even need to keep the same links as the original; just an official Canadian government website would suffice. Sarah5085 (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2021 (UTC).

Hi, I think this is a great start. I'm glad you're adding in more species so that readers don't get the idea that the few listed before were the only ones. It might have just been an error in copying and pasting but I suggest that you keep the "External links" section from the original article, unless these sources contain false information. As you work toward your final draft you can also move the pictures to best align with the format. --Anpa12 (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I reviewed what you have up currently and it looks good! I think it is well-structured and you're close to being finished. I don't have any major recommendations Sarah5085 (talk) 15:49, 16 November 2021 (UTC).