User talk:EP111

Team links
Hi, hope you're good. I noticed some of you've been creating some old race pages using the ct template. I just thought I'd let you know I made a page for the non-code teams that you might find useful. I created redirects that can be used in the template for, e.g. will put out. Great work by the way. BaldBoris 18:35, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * OK, cheers Boris. I've been using the category up to now. Though, your page will be useful if I get stuck. EP111 (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings
...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Merry Christmas and a happy New Year, from grey ol' Blighty! EP111 (talk) 13:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing

 * Thanks for the offer, but I'm busy filling in many of the redlinks on the European cycle race articles at the moment, which I expect will take me another year or so. All the best, EP111 (talk) 16:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem! Keep up the good work. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Golf courses in the Metropolitan Borough of Wirral
Template:Golf courses in the Metropolitan Borough of Wirral has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 21:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Someone opened a ANI thread about you
Someone opened an ANI thread Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The user clearly does not have an experiemce with ANI and did not notify you, so I am doing it for them. I have not a slightest idea whether the thread has merit, I am merely a messenger, but it would be probably best of you react having the above in mind. Thanks.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the notification. EP111 (talk) 10:48, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Electronic instruments / Synthesizer category (again)
Hi there EP111, hopefully we can finally claify this once and for all. I know you have quoted WP:SUBCAT; and don't want duplication of categorys which is fine, the only problem is if a page gets created for example Yamaha DX7 the parent category (supercategory) of Yamaha would leave the synthesizer devoid of any new entries (which is what was happening which new pages being added ) which is why i added Synthesizers to the Category:Synthesizers category because that is essentially what it is. Could you please take a look at the categorys if you have not already and tell me what you think as some pages such as this and some contain just one category and some pages up to nine categorys!. There is no consistency at all amongst them, in all the main electronic music category. I have listed the main infoboxes here so you can take a look at some of the pages when you get a chance.Template:Korg Template:Roland Template:Yamaha and Template:Akai. Let us please reach some a compromise on this and move forward as fellow wikipedians. Thank you Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 07:30, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Heres another page i found here only one category on it and has multiple issue and yet it hard to find as the only category is Korg synthesizers, one category the page says "This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (July 2016)". There are many more like this that need improving by inline citations or cats so people can find them. Thanks Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 08:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Further more you in the past have added some very good further reading, sometimes linking to Sound On Sound magazine and Music Technology which are very well respected sources to my pages for example here and I have publically thanked for each and everone one, so why you turned rogue on me suddenly I have no clue whatsover Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 11:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The whole area of synthesiser categorisation does need a big cleanup, which I happily recognise (however, it's no one person's responsibility to do this). Categories are not usually the primary method of navigation through the encyclopedia, as simple inline links and footer templates achieve most of this. A relative newbie should, ideally, leave categorisation alone until they know exactly what they're doing. Up until the last month or so, I've not really taken a proper look at synths in probably about ten years. The category structure is quite complex. For instance, any synthesizers listed in Category:Electronic musical instruments should be much further down the category tree, as Category:Electronic musical instruments appears to be the top level category for any musical instrument that runs on electricity. As far as the Yamaha DX7 is concerned, it shouldn't be directly placed in either of Category:Synthesizers or Category:Electronic musical instruments (and Category:Keyboard instruments should probably be ignored, until an obvious WP:Consensus is achieved), because they're all too high up the category structure (other usable categories are listed within these categories). As a rule of thumb, I'd suggest that if the article has a manufacturer's name in the title, it shouldn't be listed high up the category structure at all.


 * This is the bit you'll probably like the most: You can add synthesizers to Category:Polyphonic synthesizers (which has a companion Category:Monophonic synthesizers) or any of the categories within Category:Synthesizers by manufacturer (a category I created twelve years ago), and possibly Category:Digital synthesizers or one of its two subcategories (or its companion Category:Analog synthesizers). Though, again, be careful with any categories which are higher up the category structure. So, every synth should at least be categorised to 1. Manufacturer, 2. Mono or poly and 3. Digital or analog.


 * As far as 'going rogue' is concerned, Wikipedia is a very simple business: Do things right, and there are no problems for anyone. Do things wrong and it's likely to get found out very quickly (and possibly cause the annoyance of extra work for others), because a lot of people use their WP:Watchlist. With your links, note that [|here] is non-functional formatting, as it takes me nowhere. You've no need to external-link within your comments unless you're totally lost. A simple Korg Pa600MY, for an internal link, is enough. The other thing I'd recommend keeping easy access to (if not have an immediate thorough read of) is MOS:C - Wikipedia's massive rulebook. EP111 (talk) 16:36, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi there, an editor scolded me for not adding category's to the pages I'm creating (which might explain which I really do need to get clarification on this) but thank for you for recognising the category's are ambiguous at best!! As you've probably seen that's why I wanted to clear this with you as you have been adding further reading to a lot of pages which is great, but undoing edits is not, would it be easier if I just used the vendor as one category then and you add the category's in moving forward so you can do you Tour de France pages and I can resume editing the electronic instruments pages? Does that sound good to you? (As for being a newbie I've been here now since 20 September 2011) (also sorry for posting originally on your page rather than the talk page that was a genuine mistake I assure you!) And yes you are also better at UEL formatting than me but we are all here to learn :) Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 17:05, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I know you've been registered for quite a long time, but you haven't done that many edits (only a thousand or so, and most of those only in the last three months), hence the 'relative newbie'. If you just want to add the manufacturer's category and then let others pick up the slack, then that should be alright, as long as at least the one category is present. Note also, it's *categories* for plural, *category* for singular and the possessive apostrophe is something else! EP111 (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note also, it's *categories* for plural, *category* for singular and the possessive apostrophe is something else! EP111
 * Ha yes, the rules for the apostrophe are a tad convoluted. Glad we can now move forward Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 18:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi again, I like your suggestion for Cat:1. Manufacturer, 2. Mono or poly and 3. Digital or analogue. is quite good but does make me worry that any future entries will leave the synthesizer category quite sparse, unless of course that can be merged? Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 17:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sparsity shouldn't be a problem, as all the synthesisers will be listed within the subcategories of Category:Synthesizers. EP111 (talk) 17:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Navbox logos
Hi again. Quick question because I know you created the categorys for the some of the synths as you said. A logo has been added to the Korg navbox a while back, so I added one to Roland et al. Today, an editor has removed the Roland logo from the navbox and said the logos are not to be used outside of the main page. Which editor is correct?. Thanks Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 08:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I didn’t say that logos are to not to be used outside of the main page, so please don’t misquote or misrepresent me. What I said was that non-free content cannot be used in the template namespace per WP:NFCC. File:Roland Corporation logo.svg is licensed as non-free content so each use of it must satisfy Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy; File:Logo korg.png, on the other hand, is licensed as public domain content, so it is not subject to Wikipedia’s non-free content use policy and therefore can used in a template, etc. FWIW, File:Roland logo.svg is a PD file from Commons which can be used in the template if you want. — Marchjuly (talk) 08:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * As Marchjuly said, you have to check the image rights before use. Not all images are equal, and this is particularly likely to be the case with corporate property, such as a company logo. EP111 (talk) 10:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * @EP111 thanks for that
 * @Marchjuly i will revert the change, thanks.
 * As I've explained on my user talk, User talk:Ijustwannabeawinner, in this discussion thread, and in edt sums here, here, and here, File:Roland Corporation logo.svg is licensed as non-free content and non-free content is clearly not allowed to be used anywhere other than the article namespace per WP:NFCC. This means no userpages, no talk apges, no sandboxes, no drafts, no userboxes, no portals, and no templates, etc. I'm not sure how or why you are having difficulty understanding this or what you means by this edit sum, but nothing EP111 posted about has changed the fact this this file cannot be used in templates per Wikipedia policy. Now, if you want to ask for clarifcation on this, feel free to do so at WP:MCQ or WT:NFC. Not every image you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same, and how a file is licensed pretty much determines how it can be used on Wikipedia. As I suggested above, if you want to add a logo file to the Roland template, you can use File:Roland logo.svg. That file is under a public domain license and is available from Commons. Image use and licensing can be trickly, so mistakes are expected and considered OK; however, repeating the same mistake over and over again is not, especially when you informed that it's a mistake. Continuing to re-add the file to the template is going to eventually be considered edit warring (please note that removing clear violations of Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is not considered a violation of 3RR per WP:NOT3RR) and will lead to adminstrator being asked to step and take action as needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)


 * @ Marchjuly The confusion probably comes from this which is also above "File:Roland logo.svg is a PD file from Commons which can be used in the template if you want".
 * An edit war is when editors disagree which i did't think they did, post the previous discussions (with EP111)
 * If you want your way fine, but you will have to revert other nav boxes by other editors too.Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 12:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * If you find any more non-free files being used in templates, you can remove them yourself per WP:NFCC. Just make sure you leave a clear edit sum explaining why. However, public domain or freely-licensed files are not subject to Wikipedia's non-free content use policy and thus they can be used in templates like navboxes and there's no need to remove them (at least not for non-free content use reasons). So, please check the file's licensing to be sure you're not removing one of those files. If you're not sure how a file is licensed, you can ask for help at WP:MCQ. File:Roland logo.svg and File:Roland Corporation logo.svg are two completely different files with completely different copyright licenses; perhaps you didn't closely look at each file and it's licensing which is why you got confused. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * To remove any ambiguity then, if you believe the old Roland logo (not the Orange one) can be used could you revert the change?Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 12:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I found this for the Yamaha template File:Yamaha logo.svg that is in the public domain. Anyone have any objections to me putting it on there? Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 13:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I cannot see any particular problem with it, though I'm not the best person to ask on such a matter. You may have better luck at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests or WP:MCQ. The quicker alternative is to put it in place and wait and see if anyone removes it. If someone does remove it, and provides a reason in the edit summary, then it's best not to revert it. EP111 (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * @EP111 Cheers, i'll apply the logo now. Ijustwannabeawinner (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Nord Modular
Hello EP111,

You have removed valuable resourses from the external links of the Nord Modular page. These are flagships for the Clavia Nord Modular and Nord modular G2: http://www.nordkeyboards.com/sound-libraries/nord-sample-library-archive/tuned-percdrums/roland-kuit-old-skool-drums You named this advertisment. But you kept the link to the Wizzoo books. I hope you will roll back your edit. Thank you in advance, Kymaman (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2018 (UTC)Kymaman
 * According to your userpage, there is a clear personal interest in the weblinks I've removed. According to the guideline in WP:ADV, "you should avoid linking to a site that you own, maintain, or represent", which is why you shouldn't have added them. The role of an editor is to further the interests of the encyclopedia, not to promote oneself. EP111 (talk) 23:07, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello EP111, My mistake, sorry about the links. Without th links this would be accepted? I see here still this link: http://www.wizoobooks.com/Englische-Produkte/Books/Wizoo-Guide-Nord-Modular-2nd-revised-edition::327.html This must be a clear personal interest in your opinion. Why did you not remove this one? Also you removed my non commercial lecture link on Logic and the Nord modular: http://rolandkuit.com/Creating.htm (furthering the interests of the encyclopedia) Kymaman (talk) 09:35, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Kymaman
 * The Wizoo book isn't of any clear, personal interest to any editor (but it would be better in a "further reading" section, if it has an isbn or oclc; rather than as an external link). Your non-commercial link is still of clear, personal interest to you; that definitely fails WP:ADV on the grounds of "you should avoid linking to a site that you own, maintain, or represent". EP111 (talk) 05:15, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * p.s. The Wizoo book has both an isbn and an oclc, so I've moved it to a "Further reading" section. EP111 (talk) 05:24, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
 * p.p.s. Would they be accepted without the links? Without another text source, any content from them would fail WP:NOR. Why didn't I remove the Wizoo book? It's a third-party published book, acceptable as WP:RS, and not WP:SPS. EP111 (talk) 07:16, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer EP111, The Wizzoo book is filled with very low level examples for the Nord Modular. As you explained not to link to one's personal website it should be all right to link to the third party publisher of these iconic Kuit books? Kymaman (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Kymaman
 * Books which have an ISBN or OCLC number can be included in either a further reading section, or as references. Though, it should be left to another editor to include them, rather than the author. If the author included them, it would raise a WP:COI. EP111 (talk) 22:35, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Christmas Greetings
Merry Christmas and a happy New Year to yourself, as well! EP111 (talk) 04:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Scope of article on Birkenhead
Following your reversal of my edit, I have started a discussion on the talk page about the scope of this article. Please contribute. JMcC (talk) 11:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

What is wikidata and why we can't use it for now
Hi EP111. If you have time, I would like you to explain me somethings about wikidata. Not because I disagree with removing it, but simply because its hard to understand what its wikidata (and where it cames from) and why it can't use it (at least for now). I've tried to read the discussions but I couldn't really understand (my knowledge about code and informatic stuff is low). So, if you can explain it to me in a simple way, I would appreciate. Rpo.castro (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * The problem is mostly explained in fragments of the second discussion, which I highlighted in the edit summary, but I'll summarise it as best as I can: Wikidata is an off-site resource which is manually created, in a similar way to Wikipedia. However, it fails as user-generated content, frequently fails verifiability because much wikidata still provides no reliable source and, in the case of the cycling templates, also breaks the formatting and the accessibility of Wikipedia. Wikidata also decouples much of the regular wikicode from the Wikipedia pages that wikicode should be on, making pages much more difficult to edit for the average user. Hence, the decisions to not use wikidata. All in all, wikidata has been (and still is) a massively disruptive thing to be imposed upon Wikipedia. Once I've replaced the wikidata content in cycling articles, I expect to request that Wikiproject Cycling at least has the wikidata templates, if not outright deleted, so that wikidata cannot mistakenly be used. EP111 (talk) 05:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answer. Now I understand it completely. Thanks.Rpo.castro (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Module:Cycling race
Module:Cycling race has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the module's entry on the Templates for discussion page. * Pppery * has returned 19:04, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:September 2019 events in Spain


A tag has been placed on Category:September 2019 events in Spain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Need advice re. renaming an article you created
Hiya, I hope you don't mind that I've contacted you directly, but I thought reaching out to someone might be better than just adding something to the talk page... I've been reading up on Robert Jones (convict), and of course I was happy to see he was exonerated last year - but even though his page has been updated to show this, the title of the article hasn't :(

I've edited a few articles but am new to this, plus I'm working off a phone right now - I wanted some advice on what you think about changing the title to match the other articles on overturned convictions? It looks like the general rule/concensus is to change it to "wrongfully convicted", so adding a word in, which I'm sure I can figure out eventually! Specifically I've looked at this category page for a guide: Category:People wrongfully convicted of murder

Can you please let me know what you think? Thanks! Blue-Sonnet (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2019 (UTC)


 * First of all, sorry about the very late reply. Secondly, I've moved the page for you, to Robert Jones (wrongful conviction). EP111 (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)


 * That's great, thank you! Better late than never, I'm really bad for late responses myself on Quora 🙂   Now I know what to do, there are one or two other instances floating about that I might look at updating myself.
 * At some point.
 * Probably.
 * Yup.


 * 'kthxbye!
 * Blue-Sonnet (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Redirection
Hi, it appears that you tried to create a redirect at Jose Manuel Uria, but didn't do it correctly. I've fixed it now. For future reference, the correct redirect syntax is: You can check redirects with the Preview button before saving them. If you have created a working redirect, the preview will show the name of the target page alongside a bent arrow (or "Redirect to:" label in text mode). — Smjg (talk) 12:56, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) REDIRECT target page name
 * I'm aware of the format, that was just a typo. Thanks. EP111 (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Spaceflight newsletter notification
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rudnichny, Kirov Oblast


The article Rudnichny, Kirov Oblast has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No reliable sources cited."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ardenter (talk) 18:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Where is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudnichny, Kirov Oblast? Why aren't government agency foreign language sources being considered as reliable? Why has most of the rest of this category not been flagged for deletion? EP111 (talk) 11:37, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Mark Bezos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Bezos, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Mark Bezos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

The WikiEagle - January 2022
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Llangorse Lake Halt railway station
Was it your intention to write a Wikipeia article on this Mid-Wales Railway railway station?

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 23:03, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Northern Gateway railway station


A tag has been placed on Northern Gateway railway station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"No mention of this naming on page it redirects to"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Missing Wikipedians
I have added your user name to the Missing Wikipedians list because you have not had an edit since December 16, 2021. If you return, please remove it. I hope you are well. Donner60 (talk) 06:45, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

You know what? I think I'll start editing again. All the best. EP111 (talk) 12:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Good to hear. Donner60 (talk) 06:01, 6 July 2024 (UTC)