User talk:ERadcliffe

May 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Graham Westbrook Rowley, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
 * Copying text from other sources
 * Policy on copyright
 * Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
 * Policy and guideline on non-free content

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:



Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:



I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Ann Radcliffe
Hello ERadcliffe, and welcome to Wikipedia! I've noticed that you are interested in Ann Radcliffe page, which I am always pleased to see people taking an interest in-- I'm a big fan of Radcliffe. I noticed that you have been removing the which the article used to contain. This is, to my eye, the "standard" image of Radcliffe and thus definitely suitable for the article-- can you explain why you think it ought to be removed?

By your username I'm guessing that you are a Radcliffe fan too-- if you'd like to contribute to the article, it looks to me like it would benefit from a bit of reorganization of the current material, which is a bit scattershot. Almost all of the articles on her novels, too, could be improved, especially filling in the "reception" sections. I hope you find some editing that you enjoy and decide to stick around! ~ oulfis 🌸 (talk) 02:41, 2 January 2021 (UTC)