User talk:ESCapade/Zenfolio

Please feel free to improve this stub. ESCapade (talk) 11:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * This is an advertisement; it has no assertion of notability; it has no reliable sources. If it appeared in articlespace I would immediately delete it on grounds of non-notability and blatant advertising. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I agree with Orangemike's assessment. This would be a CSD candidate as advertising, a non-notable company, and an article previously deleted via AFD. -- Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 17:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I need WP out of personal interpretation of it. Below are a few words i picked from CON. Please enjoy. See you after 2 weeks, this stub has to end either way.


 * Consensus discussions should always be attempts to convince others, using reasons.
 * That said, consensus is not simple agreement; a handful of editors agreeing on something does not constitute a consensus, except in the thinnest sense.
 * Past decisions are open to challenge and are not binding,.. ESCapade (talk) 16:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I just tagged this user page article for speedy deletion as blatant advertising. Please note the previous AFD that took place on this article which resulted in it being deleted, the history of this article being deleted five times, and the advice of others above, on your talk page, and elsewhere explaining to you why this article doesn't meet the criteria for inclusion. I also notified you almost a month ago on your talk page that an advert in your user space was eligible for speedy deletion. There have been no substantive changes to the page since then, and there is still no indication of notability. --  Transity  ( talk &bull;  contribs ) 17:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)