User talk:EVILMEEVIN!/Daisy Cave/Jtrigue Peer Review

Content[edit]
Content added is relevant to the topic. Focuses on Daisy Cave by providing location, excavation, and artifacts found in that area. Information was extracted from early 21st century articles. No content is missing, overall structure of the article clearly defines the space.

Tone and Balance[edit]
The content presented is given in a neutral perspective it neither sympathizes nor disparages. Gives information solely to inform and there are no opinions. Nothing was overrepresented or underrepresented, writer utilized sources well enough to expand on the topic.

Sources and References[edit]
Sources provided have been extracted from journal articles and academic works found in universities. Although journal articles or sources were extracted from the late 20th century and early 21st century, the information remains relevant today. All links have demonstrated function.

Organization[edit]
Content that has been added is well written as it is concise, clear, and easy to read. No spelling or grammatical errors were found. The organization of this article for this specific topic allows for clear understanding as it breaks down information from a general idea down to the specific findings within the location.

Images and Media[edit]
Article includes a total of four images all in which have clear and understandable captions. First image proceeds to show a visual understanding of the location. Second image defines an artifact, more specifically a skeletal body of a bear, to show what was found in Daisy Cave. Third and fourth imagees show a visual representation of diet and vegetation surrounding and in the area that is Daisy Cave.

New Article[edit]
All sources have been taken from secondary sources such as journal articles and has more than 2. Only two similar links however, all provide important information that has been used to explain information. A strength in this article is it provides detailed information on objects found in Daisy Cave area to understand location and early life. To further improve the article it can be suggested to identify current existing life and what it is used for now. Article mainly focuses and what was found and history. Overall, a well structured article and easy to understand. Jtrigue (talk) 03:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)