User talk:EWBlyden 85

Charlie Kirk page poll
Hello EWBlyden 85, just wanted to give you a heads up that there was a poll put up on the Turning Point USA Talk page, about Charlie Kirk getting his own page, I saw you expressed interest on this matter. Thought you might like to add to the discussion. If you need assistance just reply to this message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RawHide93 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above canvassing editor was blocked as a sockpuppet of The Expert. Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I'll be sure to weigh in. EWBlyden 85 (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 20:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

February 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Project Veritas, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   18:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


 * User:Newslinger I provided a valid reason in the edit summary. I understand you are an administrator, but you should not use your prerogatives to make biased judgments about the validity of edits in a subject of political controversy. There is no objective standard, of intellectual history or political science, by which Project Veritas could be deemed "far-right." EWBlyden 85 (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * EWBlyden 85, the "far-right" descriptor is currently supported by 10 reliable sources, all cited adjacent to the descriptor, and your edit summary did not explain why your choice of wording should ignore these sources (WP:V). Feel free to start a discussion on the talk page. I am editing the article in my capacity as an editor, not as an administrator. —  Newslinger  talk   20:03, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Redding News Review
If you restore a properly removed speedy tag again, as you did in the above article, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I assumed it was an act of vandalism because I did not know you were an administrator and the subject and likely author of the article is known to have proxies that remove deletion notices. What is your reason for removing the speedy tag? The article has serious issues and is written in blatant self-promotion, except for the controversies section, which has other issues. EWBlyden 85 (talk) 17:14, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Another administrator removed your G11 after I did; the article is not a G11. If you believe the subject is not notable, you must use a different deletion process. And next time you assume bad faith on the part of an editor (me), take a moment to check who they are.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:18, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand and apologize for my mistake, but I would have appreciated a brief explanation for the removal of the notice in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.EWBlyden 85 (talk) 17:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * By use a different deletion process, Bbb23 did mean try to reopen a 16-year-old AfD. Stop being disruptive. &#8209; Iridescent 17:21, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What are you talking about? Please don't insult me as "disruptive" when I'm just trying to help curate these articles, even if I am just a novice editor. EWBlyden 85 (talk) 17:30, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The AfD you linked to was done well before my current issues with the Redding News Review page. I did not reopen it now. Both of those articles are awful and should not be on Wikipedia. EWBlyden 85 (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Other editors have raised the same concerns about Redding's pages, which are really among the worst in terms of relying on the author/subject's own self-promotional sources and containing false and misleading info about the author/subject. Just because action has not been taken in the last decade, doesn't mean action should not be taken now. EWBlyden 85 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I understand what was referring to. Still would appreciate more patience and kindness from admins as I try to learn how best to help Wikipedia.EWBlyden 85 (talk) 17:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)