User talk:E Wing/Archive 1

Image Tagging Image:Wing-0 NeoBird.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Wing-0 NeoBird.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use .)  See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Secretlondon 07:13, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Oh My Goddess!
I welcome you to join the ongoing article improvement drive. -- Cool CatTalk 20:53, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

GS-9900 G-Falcon
Thanks for the expansion! Interesting that the GX, Airmaster, and Leopard kits can't dock with the G-Falcon. Magus Melchior 15:31, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SRW-OG box-art.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SRW-OG box-art.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Caesar (video game)
Hi. Why did you revert my reversion of deletion vandalism to Caesar (video game) by 67.163.2.230 in this edit? Would you please consider reversing your action? Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 02:29, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter, and for joining the fight against vandalism (per my user talk page). I accept your apology.    — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 02:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Hmm? —DerHexer (Talk) 11:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

speedy tagging.
Hi there, I've been going through checking on the speedy delete list and saw you tagged Otherkin. I'm not sure if you checked the history, though it looks like it's a fringe subject that did have an article that had been previously vandalised, and had gone unnoticed. I've now put the document to an earlier version and removed the speedy tag. Cheers Khu  kri  15:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

My talk page
Why are you giving me a hard time about my talk page? I just got this connection and I really don't need alot of nonsense warnings on my talk page thanks. 76.111.250.140 (talk) 00:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but as Rich Farmbrough said, it is not acceptable to delete/remove warnings from one's talk page. E Wing (talk)


 * It may not be acceptable but it surely isn't against wikipedia policy. 76.111.250.140 (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, it is against Wikipedia policy to vandalize IP talk pages, whether or not you are editing from that particular IP address. — Satori Son 00:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Removing text
Thank you for your recent reversion to various edits of mine on the United States Talk page, and for your warning of removal of information from that page on my talk page. Please not that your reversion in fact removed material from the page as well. perhaps you should be more vigiliant in your future reversions. Thanks. 62.72.110.11 15:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reminder. I have recovered the lost material from the page. Thanks. E Wing 15:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

No thank you, you dealt with the matter in a calm, collected and civil manner, both resolving the matter as it should have been done, and acknowledging that you may have made a mistake. It is editors like yourself who, although perhaps underappreciated, keep Wikipedia afloat. So, thank you kindly. 62.72.110.11 15:27, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...
for this GDallimore (Talk) 08:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem :-) E Wing 11:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism to Liger by 82.150.99.2
This vandalism appears to have been done by 142.227.229.129 and was reverted by 82.150.99.2. Then 82.150.99.2 accidently undid the reversion so then redid it leaving the page clean (all within the space of 5 minutes).

I do not believe that 82.150.99.2 is guilty of vandalism, therefore should not have the notice on its talk page. 82.150.99.2 (talk) 13:18, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I think you should talk to User:Fluri, since he/she made the warning, not me. E Wing 13:22, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed. I left a message for User:Fluri and removed the warning from my page. You replaced the warning so I left a message for you as well. 82.150.99.2 (talk) 13:28, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism
Thanks for the revert of the crap on my page. Really appreciate it, as I don't get on much and can't always revert myself. Thanks again! Bouncehoper (talk) 18:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. It's my duty :-) E Wing 01:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

User page Vandalism
Cheers on the revert man! --Cody Pope (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again.  Snowolf How can I help? 15:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
 * The edit you linked was from 17 December ;-)  Snowolf How can I help? 15:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism by User 208.127.154.159
Since 10 December 2007, the above user has been gutting the article on Arnold Murray. I reverted it but decided to leave it alone. This is why wikipedia has problems raising money. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.87.185.73 (talk) 23:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Careful with the vandalism button
Hi there! This edit, which you reverted with a Twinkle auto-comment characterizing it as "vandalism", appears to have been a good-faith edit, just done to the wrong page by mistake. Don't bite the newbies, and all. :) I assume this was just an oversight on your part.  I see lots of anti-vandalism patrolling in your contribs.  Keep up the good work!  — DragonHawk (talk|hist) 14:36, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

VoABot II
Actually, I think Vandal Proof goofed because VoABot II and I edited at the same time. VP is usually great, but once in a while, it makes an odd glitch. Thanks for catching that and thanks for mentioning it to me. Doczilla (talk) 15:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Tidy
Thanks for tidying up that anon talk page. I've protected it for a while and blocked for 6 months so hopefully no more trouble there for a bit. Keep up the good work! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV.
Hi, thanks for fighting vandals. I noticed you reported someone who had received a uw-vandalism4im: generally, it's not good to report users with only an only warning, because that's not assuming good faith. If you see someone like that, just go back to vandalism-3 or maybe 4 warning, instead of report them. Thanks! If I said something wrong, sorry, it's really early, and I'm in kind of a rush...· AndonicO  Hail!  10:43, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Ultrasone
Hi, my edit wasn't vandalism, I was reverting vandalism - a previous editor had reverted to a POV and poorly sourced version that acted as an advertisement for Ultrasone, written by a banned editor who would not allow any balance on the page. I reverted to the last good version, using the undo button. In future I will leave a note too. I was about to add note on the talk page also. Thanks --88.172.132.94 (talk) 13:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Noted E Wing (talk) 13:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your concern. Happy editing --88.172.132.94 (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, E Wing! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 14:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

False revert: 71.2.4.205
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It appears that you have reverted previous contructive edits on Wikipedia (see above). Consider revising the way you edit. Calling something Vandalism is a serious thing in wikipedia. You mustn't use it lightly or without being quite sure of your facts. Please read WP:VANDAL - which explains precisely what is and what isn't vandalism - and how to handle these more dubious cases. It says:

--Niyant (talk) 00:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Even harmful edits that are not explicitly made in bad faith are not considered vandalism. -- Remember, we are supposed to Assume Good Faith.
 * ...significant content removals are usually not considered to be vandalism where the reason for the removal of the content is readily apparent by examination of the content itself, -- I think it was pretty clear why the removal happened when your read what was removed.
 * Do not use ... [the vandalism] ... templates in content disputes; instead, write a clear message explaining your disagreement. -- Using 'The V-word' is a serious matter, don't do it lightly!

Please ask permission
Please ask permission before editing my talk page. Your erroneous vandalism revert removed my reply to another editor. Please read WP:VAN to find out what vandalism really is. Thanks and have a nice day. 156.34.142.110 (talk) 13:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Just In Time (business) article
I am slightly puzzled by your recent edit to the Just In Time (business) article. I am certainly not criticising, I just don't understand your comment on your recent edit. I certainly approve of the edit itself.

Here is what happened: I didn't identify anything as vandalism. And you didn't remove the "kk". You restored something much more significant, which was nothing to do with me.
 * 193.62.251.312 added a "kk" to the end of a line. Maybe vandalism, maybe just hitting the keyboard by mistake.
 * I removed it again.
 * 82.2.91.1 deleted the entire "Effects" section.
 * You restored it again. But, you commented your restore with "Reverted 1 edit by 82.2.91.1 identified as vandalism to last revision by Maproom. using TW".

I guess I am bringing this up because I am worried that I might be the one who deleted the "Effects" section.

BTW, if you are good at handling vandalism, you might take a glance at Mongols, Timur, and Genghis Khan. This seems to be a field that attracts them (though they are all unvandalised at the time of writing). Maproom (talk) 23:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Let's see... After you removed the "kk" from the article, you're the last one who edited the article until User:82.2.91.1 deleted the entire "Effects" section, right? At the time I restored the entire section, I'm the last one to edit the page. The comment {automatically generated by the Twinkle script is "(Reverted 1 edit by 82.2.91.1 identified as vandalism to last revision by Maproom. using TW)" means I reverted the last edit before mine (section blanking by User:82.2.91.1) to your last version (after you deleted the "kk"). That means that the page before the blanking (your edit) was restored. As for that vandalism, the Twinkle script may generate custom edit summary but since deleting is/may also considered as vandalism, I used the "Vandalism" edit summary (the default one; maybe I'm just too lazy, sorry about that). As for the 3 articles, I'll have them under my watchlist. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 23:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the explanation. It all makes sense to me now. And thanks for keeping an eye on Mongols etc.; and for the rest of your work, of course. Maproom (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy Birthday
-- Nadir D Steinmetz 13:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Blanking user pages
Wikipedia policy explicitly permits users to blank their own talk pages. There is no requirement to archive. Undoing such blanking is, technically, vandalism. Please don't do it again. 136.8.152.13 (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that is not at all accurate. — Satori Son 16:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

vandalism by 71.162.58.225‎
thanks for knocking some sense into this newbie. I left a message on his page asking him/her to stop. I threatened to send the cyber police to his/her house. --Provodnik (talk) 04:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
As has been noted by multiple users, your habit of simply reverting recent changes, including the (perfectly allowable) blanking of one's own user page, is, itself, vandalism. This constitutes your last warning. 138.23.72.65 (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually, the blanking of IP talk pages is not permitted. And reverting it is definitely not vandalism on E Wing's part. If you would like to have control over a user talk page, please register an account and log in. Thanks. — Satori Son 16:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Satori Son said it all.  Snowolf How can I help? 16:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I have no wish to drink the Kool-Aid.71.9.8.150 (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem at all. I understand that many people don't want to register for many reasons. But please don't harass our registered volunteers for keeping things tidy. — Satori Son 20:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Additional note - after some perusal of WP:Talk and USER PAGES, I see no mention whatsoever of any policy difference relative to IP users. Perhaps you can direct me to where in policy it says they can't blank their user page. 71.9.8.150 (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * User != IP. Issue closed.  Snowolf How can I help? 20:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * So there is no such policy. Just your wishful thinking, counter to Wikipendia's established policies and guidelines which recognize anonymous IP users. Thank you for the clarification, though I doubt it's what you intended.  Original point stands, BTW, E Wing: before reverting edits, particularly peoples' actions on their own user pages, I suggest you check to see whether the action violates any policy.  To do otherwise is, itself, contrary to policy: [] and [] - "On your own user talk page, you may remove comments from others."  Thanks. 71.9.8.150 (talk) 22:13, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Isssue closed. IP are not users, are IP. Full stop. IPs are not entitled to remove warnings from their talk page.  Snowolf How can I help? 00:37, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Again, please direct me to the policy page which declares IP users are not users and not entitled to the same rights as other users. It would seem any such policy would be in direct conflict with the stated aims of WP, and many other guides and policies, but I'm fully willing to be educated if I'm wrong.  Link please, instead of simple assertion?  138.23.246.0 (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * You've been told by two different Wikipedia administrators that your behavior is inappropriate. Continuing to post "warnings" on users' talk pages is harassment and is only going to get you blocked. You have been warned. — Satori Son 01:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have, indeed, been told my behavior is "inappropriate." I have asked for clarification of precisely what policy or guideline I am violating.  I do not see how I can avoid violating policies in the future if I don't know what they are.  Again, I'm only seeking information here.  My understanding has always been that IP users are legitimate and welcome contributors to the project.  As such, it was my understanding that I could remove harassing false 'warnings' related to an edit conflict (now long resolved).  When E-Wing reverted that change, my understanding was that it was he who violated policy, and I provided links to same.  Can you please show me what you think i've violated? 138.23.246.0 (talk) 01:44, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sigh... as you have been told ad nauseam, the guideline you cite does not apply to IP pages. Exactly how am I supposed to prove a negative? But as far as your blockable behavior of giving warnings after you were told not to, see WP:CIVIL, WP:HARASS, and WP:POINT.
 * Your "drinking the Kool-Aid" comment shows exactly how much respect you have for us and our guidelines, and I have grown weary of repeating myself. — Satori Son 12:48, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Please be patient. I recognize the addictive nature of wikipedia editing, and one way I keep my own habit in check is by refraining from registering.  That doesn't mean I don't acknowledge and follow policies.  I still do not understand.  Where on that guideline does it say IP users are excluded or are somehow 'not' users?  Every guideline I've seen claims just the opposite (examples:Wikipedia has no hierarchy with respect to IP users []). I'm not being obtuse...I'm actually in quite some shock about what you claim is an official policy which seems counter to the whole project. I'm not asking you to prove a negative. 138.23.246.0 (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

CATI
Hi there, if you are interested in supporting the Coalition Against Tagalog Imperialism please add. The logo would look like

Arikasikis (talk) 03:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I speak in Filipino. Hehehe. E Wing (talk) 09:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
I'm just curious a. why you wrote on my talk page, and b. how did you even know about? and finally c. what do you get from editing vandalism on obscure ip adresses talk pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.63.22 (talk) 19:22, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Right on what's your damage editing ip address talk pages? don't you have better things to edit? 203.129.50.27 (talk) 12:08, 29 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I do have better things on Wikipedia to edit. And that includes reverting vandalism and restoring pages blanked by an IP user. E Wing (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

So your answer is that you don't have anything better to do then patrol other people's tlak pages? Seriously? That is so weak. Have fun guy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.63.22 (talk) 08:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

bro, you are such a nerd. I cant imagine how sad your life must be where instead of editing articles, you troll people's ip pages and make comments on them. Sad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.101.164 (talk) 19:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''Thanks for trying to help, but please don't edit other's comments. What you changed actually made the sentence not make sense.''  Pump me  up  05:23, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, just noticed now. Thanks for the correction and for the warning, I'll try to be more carefull. :-) E Wing (talk) 09:54, 6 March 2008
 * Sorry for "templating a regular" - I was in the heat of recent changes patrol. Cheers,  Pump me  up  15:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of User talk:Roommatesmagazine
Why are you giving me a template warning for a user talk page that isn't mine? IrishGuy talk 16:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

MYOB
My talk page is mine to do with what I wish. If you want to leave a message there, that's fine. But if I decide to clear it of old messages that's MY business. It's not YOUR place to revert the edits I make on MY talk page. Keep your hands off it. 209.247.22.164 (talk) 13:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Pandaigdigang pagkakapatiran
It's time to transfer your translation into the article. --Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 21:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that. I am currently about 90% finished with the translation, problem is I am currently on vacation and therefore I have a limited access to the PC and the net, not to mention that this PC has just been repaired last night. The translation will be finished on the 3rd week of April when my school term starts again. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 03:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I finished the translation in your absence. You can merge to José Rizal. - DaughterofSun (talk) 20:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks about that. Just when I've just resuming the translation of the article. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 00:40, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Just thought I could help out, so that you can proceed right ahead with the merge process...  Glad to be of assistance. - DaughterofSun (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

User talk:68.60.83.118
Could you take a look at this page where you reverted a previous IP vandal. WHilst I would revert his changes back to the warning version for the reasons you give I think he may have made a valid pont on this one? Is there a policy which prevents this? BigHairRef | Talk 04:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, I can't find any policies about IP pages, although from here, I believe that the "users" stated here are those who actually registered in wikipedia, not those static IP users. Also, please see this. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


 * With respect, that's just a couple of editors persistently repeating something they believe is true, but which actually isn't. Links on request, or you could just trust me. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 09:00, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh and i see wp:up has been changed to make this explicit. kinda funny how we hafta say what isn't policy sometimes. :) I recommend clear edit summaries when giving warnings so the page history tells the story. 86.44.28.245 (talk) 12:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Why have you reverted my edit to my talk page?
I'm reverting it back as there's nothing wrong with it 81.149.250.228 (talk) 13:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I thought that you did not really found User:microchip08's secret page (until I checked your contribution list), although I reverted it assuming good faith edits. E Wing (talk) 13:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok dokey, no worries 81.149.250.228 (talk) 14:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

sorry
I just reinstalled the system, I forgot to log in :)

Thanks for keeping order on wikipedia! :)

MichuNeo (talk) 13:40, 11 April 2008 (UTC)


 * No prob! E Wing (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Usertalk: 74.225.135.179
Sorry for all the problems I caused, please don't deletemy page again because I want to Cut & Paste it to my new website which my friends are going to help me make today, thanks!

--74.225.135.179 (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Well actually, you may save it on your PC using the Notepad program (or have it email to you if you don't have one). You may also want to register an account to MySpace,Blogger, Google Blog, or any free-hosting site for your stuff since you are using Wikipedia the wrong way. E Wing (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Stop being a wannabe admin
Your edit is considered vandalism. Per wikipedia policy users are free to edit their own talk pages and remove comments as desired. 64.238.172.212 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

MfD notice
I'm writing to alert you to this edit to User talk:Sargeantskoolgossipmaster. I assume it was an error to remove the main MfD notice and I have already restored it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:01, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thanks about that, although its been a while since I removed any useless vandalism on your tallpage. I'll be copying this to my userpage if you don't mind :-). E Wing (talk) 13:09, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Why can't I blank my own talk page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.180.251 (talk) 03:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Haim Watzman
Your speedy delete tag on Haim Watzman is a mistake. Please type his name into google, then take the tag down. thank you. I do understand that lots fo vanity pages go up every day. Elan26 (talk) 12:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC) Eldad26


 * Looks like you're right. Just verified it with other editors. E Wing (talk) 12:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. Elan26 (talk) 12:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Elan26

Reverting other user talk pages
I see no reason why this user can't remove the warning from his talk page. Also, be careful with WP:3RR which you are in near violation of. - Rjd0060 (talk) 04:29, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, just a quick thanks for the revert on my talk page. Cheers. σмgнgσмg (talk) 10:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Appreciated it. :-) E Wing (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

WHAT DID I DO WRONG SHOW ME ONE INSTANCE WHEN I VANDALIZED A PAGE AFTER I RECEIVED MY WARNING. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 06:13, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * As per, replacement of content with a completely different content is vandalism. E Wing (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I was told you could change the warnings and that you could delete them off your page. This user has clearly wanted his page to say that 'This user is awesome' so why is he not in trouble for it? If that user did not want his page to say 'This user is awesome' then i would have never changed his page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 06:26, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * As per your reply above, it clearly states that you are a sockpuppet of User:71.60.91.93. Besides, you can delete past warnings, not current (on this month) warnings and shared/school ip and other tags. E Wing (talk) 06:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

I FIND YOU CALLING ME A SOCKPUPPET TO BE EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE YOU MAKE IT SEEM LIKE I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CONTROL OVER WHAT I DO. YOU ARE A SOCK PUPPET, THE CORRECT SPELLING, TO WIKIPEDIA. YOU LET WIKIPEDIA TELL YOU WHAT TO DO AND HOW TO ACT. SO HOW THE FUCK AM I A SOCK PUPPET. AND I NEVER MADE ANY EDIT TO USER:71.60.91.93. THEREFORE, YOUR ACCUSATIONS ARE ALL FALSE NOW YOU OWE ME AN APOLOGY.
 * Then how you call this ? E Wing (talk) 06:37, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

THEN HOW YOU CALL THIS? THAT MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE AT ALL I SEE WIKIPEDIA REQUIRES NO GRAMMAR TEST TO BECOME AN ADMIN. HOW DO THEY PICK ADMINS? THAT WAS NOT AN EDIT THAT WAS FIXING AN ERR YOU AND YOUR CRONIES MADE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 06:44, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixing an error? You replaced that talkpage with a completely different content. If that user wants that text to be added, then he must do it, not you. BTW, I am not an admin. E Wing (talk) 06:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

BTW PRIOR TO YOUR EDITS ON HIS PAGE HE MADE IT SAY THIS USER IS AWESOME. YOU MUST HAVE AN AWESOME LIFE TO COME ON HERE AND POLICE TALK. BTW HOW MUCH DO YOU GET PAID FOR IT? OR DO YOU DO IT FOR THE LOVE OF WIKIPEDIA THE LOVE OF PEOPLE LOOKING FOR KNOWLEDGE? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 06:52, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know that. But still, he must put it back, not you. E Wing (talk) 06:57, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

NOT TRUE SHOW ME WHERE A WIKIPEDIA ADMIN HAS MADE SUCH A RULING? OR ARE YOU TRYING TO SET A PRECEDENT WITH YOUR RULING? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 07:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC) EXACTLY THATS WHAT I THOUGHT YOU CANT SHOW ME PROOF ANYWHERE ON THIS WEBSITE YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE UP RULES AS YOU GO ON.
 * Actually, generally speaking you shouldn't alter talk page comments from other users&mdash; especially if the talk page is not yours; and, yes, I'm an admin. Also, please avoid using ALL CAPS. -- slakr  \ talk / 07:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Exactly that is generally speaking there is no rule set in stone against doing that so could you please explain how changing his page back to what HE WANTED illegal? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 21:17, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Here.E Wing (talk) 14:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

User_talk:FelisLeo
Thanks for keeping the spelling on my talk page up to standards! I can't speak for my visitors though but I appreciate it ;)  Felis Leo Talk! 13:06, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
 * It's ok, I just noticed it while patrolling user-talk pages. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 13:18, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
...for reverting my talk page, too :) → Christian .И  15:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks also. E Wing (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Hm...
. Toodles. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 15:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Why
I hate to complain all the time but why am i not allowed to have a blank page thats all i want —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * As some admins say (although I partially disagree with them), you can blank your talkpage IF you accept those warnings given to you. If you vandalized/replaced those warnings with something else, it is considered vandalism. However, you must not delete the WHOIS tag because it serves as an "indicator" of your IP address and location. E Wing (talk) 02:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

so may i ask why i have to keep the WHOIS tag? i agreed with all the warnings so i believe that it should be taken down also —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.142.113 (talk) 04:38, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The WHOIS tag is not a warning, it is a tag made up of a template. Deleting a template in any page is considered vandalism. E Wing (talk) 12:47, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
 * The WHOIS tag appears once your talk page is created. Removal is just possible if an administrator deletes it (try placing   on your talk page). Regards (and sorry to interrupt), → Christian  .И  10:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

re:thanks
Its no problem, no one likes being called a fascist Nazi or whatever it was... Its odd, I seem to attract the "lol your ghey" PAs like a moth to a flame. I blame my pink sig.-- Kero tan -Have a nice day :) 22:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

You are not an Admin
And you never will be because you have no idea what vandalism is and you do not respect opposing viewpoints. Any edit that you do not agree with is not vandalsim. Now stop vandalising my user page and stop stalking me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.201.208.59 (talk) 05:15, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


 * This admin notes that the IP's contribution 1) is unsourced and 2) was reverted by three other editors besides you. The warning on the IP's talk page was valid. Carry on. —C.Fred (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou
hi i'd like to say thankyou for reverting vandalism and award you {ARBAY (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2008 (UTC)}


 * Thank you also! E Wing (talk) 04:29, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Unblock requests
Please do not remove or tamper with requests for unblocking as you did here. Only Administrators have the right to review blocks. Thanks. --  Netsnipe  ►  18:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmm, OK. But I want to take note that the unblock template was created by that user himself, and his log does not contain any block logs. Cheers! E Wing (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

That's because logs of "autoblocks" aren't publicly accessible per Privacy policy. --  Netsnipe  ►  18:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Dagoth & stupidty
You reverted a sarcastic edit by me on User talk:92.4.223.217, since my IP address changes each day, it is irrelevant

The edit I did was deliberate - you have to understand what this "Dagoth" is doing. He has no authority to issue warnings - wherever he has applied for adminship/any authority, it has declined.

See this cached home page - go have a look at the baned sites.

Yes 8 different wikis (or at least 8 I have tracked him down to - and yes, it is all one person).

If you examine his record, he also has a tendancy to edit a page using a IP address, then 2-3 minutes later go in and correct it!

It doesnt matter to me wither you revert your revert or not, since as I say, my IP address changes each day. --92.3.63.22 (talk) 13:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC) or even this id 92.2.101.94 (talk) 13:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


 * It's OK, since I check the Recent Pages everyday. E Wing (talk) 13:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Hands off!
Get your hands off, you ass munch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.62.170.157 (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Clearly, you need to learn more about vandalism
If you do not agree with an edit, that edit is not automatically vandalism. I have reverted your nonsense revision and would very much appreciate it if you had the common sense to keep your ill-informed notions of vandalism to yourself. Given the number of complaints on this very matter here on your talk page, it is obvious that you need to re-think some of your revisions.64.201.208.81 (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Rising Star
Hi, don't forget to check the history first before requesting a speedy deletion. See Rising Star. Garion96 (talk) 20:27, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks a lot for my very first barnstar!!! LeaveSleaves (talk) 12:09, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the barnstar and your welcome :) —— Ryan   |   t   •   c   15:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the award!
That was unexpected. And you're more than welcome for the revert.  freshacconci  speak to me  11:57, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page. Also, I think I'm going to steal your template from the top of this page. :)  TN ‑ X - Man  14:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Its OK, since I stole that tag from someone else's talkpage ;-P E Wing (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

User:87.161.105.142
Hi,

I know that user was being a bit of a pain, but it is up to them if they want to blank messages on their own talk page (See WP:TALK). Provided they aren't posting personal attacks or stuff like that, it is their page so they can have what they want on it. StephenBuxton (talk) 11:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Halosean
Hi. Could you take a moment and explain this edit to Halosean's talkpage archive? By editing that template, the archived unblock request became an active one, which it wasn't. Thanks in advance, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 18:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry I didn't see that. I thought the block was still in effect. Thanks for correcting! E Wing (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Talk page
Thanks for the reversions on my talk page. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 09:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No prob! E Wing (talk) 11:39, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Protected
I have semi-protected this talk page for a while to stop the IP vandalism. Kevin (talk) 02:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi
I noticed you have a lot of anti-vandalism boxes. You'll no doubt sympathize, then, with my wish to not have my talk page vandalized. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.201.18 (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Your CSD on Jacob hook
I removed your "CSD A7" on Jacob hook and replaced it with "CSD G10" as it is obviously an attack page. This should get it deleted a lot faster.--Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * And whada you know, it's gone. Took about 30 seconds. :)--Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talkpage, much appreciated ——RyanLupin • (talk) 16:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem! E Wing (talk) 02:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Little Mountain 5  18:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...
for guarding Gundam. I'm off-line but hope to be back Sunday to continue for a few days. Hope you can contact our "good will" editor and ask him to coordinate. All the Best, Shir-El   too  12:32, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

3RR for reverting vandalism?
I'm not sure why you warned me about 3RR. 3RR specifically excludes "Simple and obvious vandalism." -- Good Damon 05:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied on your talkpage. E Wing (talk) 05:35, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

User page
Thanks for reverting my user page. --Erwin85 (talk) 18:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * No Problem! E Wing (talk) 12:32, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

User talk:76.89.204.243
Hello, I noticed your edits on User talk:76.89.204.243. Uhmm...you're warning him for editing his own talk page? I don't see the just in it. As per WP:TALK users can remove prior messages from their own talk page as they see fit. Regards, Tuxide (talk) 17:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Please help me
I have to put the Image of LaMB on the LaMB page I made so please help me with the Licensing problem I took the Image from Animax Asia site Image: http://www.animax-asia.com/info/press-releases/index-20080517.html. I upload the Image but after one week,it was deleted. Please help me with this problem Sumit (talk) 11:01 AM 30 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I don't have experience in pictures. I also uploaded some pictures in the past but they were deleted too. If you want, you may view this if you want to upload again. Thanks and happy editing! E Wing (talk) 11:08, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandal ip
Hi its the freindly ip i dont know why people are calling me vandals check my edit history and you shall see i have not said anything abusive can you explains please 86.153.130.47 (talk) 15:24, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but as the IP information from User:Hersfold/Vandal_watch, it looks like you are the banned user User:Nangparbat. Your IP is well within the range and of same location as the one from the said banned user. Also, you deleted the WHOIS tag on your IP page. E Wing (talk) 15:47, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Friendly note about talk page messages
Hello. As a recent editor at User talk:83.104.51.181, I wanted to leave you a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk page. While we may prefer that messages be archived, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors- from deleting comments from their own talk pages. The only talk page messages that may not be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates (for anonymous editors) ... and these exceptions are just to keep a user from gaming the system. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 16:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

You've got barnstar!
as confirmed here. NHRHS2010 | Talk to me  20:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks also :-) E Wing (talk) 22:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

wiktionary link
Thanks for clearing that up for me, I was befuddled by how to interwikilink. --Scarpe (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No problem, just happy to help. E Wing (talk) 09:23, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

removed link in article "organic cotton"
Hi E Wing,

you removed my link to organic cotton, but pls reconsider it. when you go to better-dressed information you will find helpfull information about organic cotton versus contventional textile production, including the video "China Blue". The site offers more information for the user than the one above in the organic cotton article www.darnelle.com

Thanks for your work, Hansilla--Hansilla (talk) 10:12, 11 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I reviewed the link, and I think its appropriate. I removed it because the link title on the article says "Organic Cotton & fair trade T-Shirts", which could be advertising, and therefore spam. I'll have it re-added then. E Wing (talk) 16:45, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Thieves guild
As regards your review of Thieves guild two points stand out: 1. You were wrong to refer the contents as nonsense; I opened the page in reference to a GAME. I guess people dont understand that in D&D, FANTASY IS NONSENSE. I appologize as english is my 2nd language. 2. You must be intelligent as you are an administrator. I respect this and accept criticism with a smile but, you were rude. Thank you. p.s. Not one thing I said was not at least a component of the game.Are you familiar with D&D? (seriously)...Princedirk (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I nominated it for G1 based from the content itself, I didn't notice that it is for a game though. Anyway, your article is now already redirected to Thieves' Guild, and I'm sorry to say that I am not a Wikipedia administrator, that English is also my 2nd language, and I'm not familiar with Dungeon and Dragons (since it is not popular in my country). Cheers and welcome to the Wikipedia community! E Wing (talk) 05:50, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

It's Dodgechris
Hi, E Wing, me, the real life person of User:Dodgechris has just created an account, this is him (see on the signiature for name), i'm just saying i'm sorry, you were persuing the Dodgechris incident, weren't you? I'm just like to say sorry to you, and please can you forgive me and please don't block this account, all i want is to edit constructively, i love wiki, but if you chose to block me, i'll be sad, but i won't use socks, i'll stay away, maybe i'll just add 1 unblock template, but that's all, if you let me keep this account, i'll edit constructively, and never, ever vandalise, i'll also be civil, avoid spamming and stick with the rules, and i'll say sorry properly to the others i harrassed, can you please send them my apologies--Gabazauls 20:35, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

I need help
I'm trying to block RedPenOfDoom, but he keeps coming back.

Help!!!--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This is User:141.209.239.170, not User:Greg D. Barnes. E Wing (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

attempted impersonation
FYI, an IP address is attempting to impersonate your account. -- The Red Pen of Doom  12:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Animax Merging?
Are you willing to work on Merging the Animax India and Animax Korea articles into the Animax Asia one? Also creating an Animax Europe article which could incorporate the Animax Hungary article and the european stuff from the main Animax article? Perhaps we do that and then create and Animax dab page for navigation? Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)


 * I am willing to help, except that my term break will start tomorrow and will end after two weeks. In the meantime, I'll ask User:Sumit_sony145 to help you out while I'm away. Cheers! E Wing (talk) 13:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops, just saw your message on his page. But what about your AfD nomination on Animax Asia? E Wing (talk) 13:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Waiting for a response from him as well as giving any others a chance to way in. Nobody should be closing it until past Monday anyway and then it can be withdrawn if need be. Jasynnash2 (talk) 13:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The other user refuses to even consider merging so I suppose he'll get around to providing the significant coverage sources and fixing the articles at some point. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of RJ REVILLA
Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 13:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above warning does not appear to be directed to the right person. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Handbagbag
If an editor has nothing on their user talk page but advertising, it would probably be best to blank the advertising and replace it with an explanation of why advertising does not belong there. If you put a speedy deletion tag on the page and the corresponding warning, the page might get speedily deleted without the editor having a chance to learn what the problem was. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Pier Gerlofs Donia
You care to review this article for GA-class? Last king of Frisia (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Impersonation
There's impersonation going on the site. Watch Out.--Thatcher (talk) 22:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * NOTE: This is User:141.209.214.22, not User:Thatcher. E Wing (talk) 00:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the speedy removal of vandalism on my talk page! Cheers, Gillyweed (talk) 21:36, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary
E Wing, Just a little "friendly reminder" to remember to always type in an edit summary. I saw you made some edits to parts of Aaron that were added by an editor who is has recently been discussed on the admin noticeboard, so all of his edits are currently being watched a little more closely. Thanks! Shirulashem (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah thanks for the reminder. I just did a little formatting on the page by the way. E Wing (talk) 00:10, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello E.Wing, --regarding your blocking legitimate entry under surname 'Heck'...
-we are wondering why you have expunged our entirely correct and legitimate entry to the prevailing surname Heck, --which we have properly expanded to include 'Vonheck' per the following: " -brilliantly innovative Industrial'Design-consultant, Grandfather J.D.Cox invented popular PopUp-Lawnsprinkler (usPat.#2,360,203), thus in 1975 Robt.VonHeck-III founded Inventech/usa in SanDiego, Calif. specializing in quality usPatent-Applications for mfg's & pvt.inventors; and helped to significantly streamline the reading of usPatents by implementing appproval for the first use of a convenient 'Nomenclature-list' of compiled numeric-indicia within the specification-text of usPatents (-for much faster understanding of the associated Pat.-drawings). Regarded as usConstitutional-patriot and founder- Theolibertaria-Int'al. -foundation for agnostic-theological truthseeking-studies. " We graciously object to this interference, and request that you kindly reverse your blocking procedure so as to enable our submission to reappear. Thank You for your cooperation my friend. DocumentationData (talk) 07:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, what you did was putting a supposedly article content on a disambiguation page. Please create a new page for your article and you may link it at the disambiguation page. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 08:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Froebel
The naming guidleines for this article appear clear as I have set out at Talk:Friedrich_Wilhelm_August_Froebel The recent attempt to move this article to a page with German umlauts is not consistent with English usage and serves only to confuse English speaking readers. Either Friedrich Froebel or Friedrich Wilhelm August Froebel would be preferred by English speakers. I have followed you instructions above. Fred20x (talk) 13:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Perhaps you can help me sort out the mess that Kelisi has made of the Froebel article. He seems unaware that Froebel has been widely used in the English speaking world for over a 150 years and appear this way in numerous Englsh sources. Most English speakers find umlauts very confusing. Friedrich Froebel is the logical place for this article, perhaps noting his full name and the German spelling. Fred20x (talk) 14:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm actually confused over at WP:NCCN. If you want help, you may contact other editors (and admins) at WP:IRC. E Wing (talk) 14:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk page blanking
Despite my earlier protecting of User talk:68.49.67.157, editors are permitted to blank their own talk pages. In terms of warnings, that just means we assume they've read them. I guess I just got annoyed last time when I protected the page.--chaser - t 04:15, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, I know that policy. But the problem is that that specified user has just got a level-4 vandalism warning from me and he also deleted the AIV report concerning his actions. BTW, removing a WHOIS tag is constituted as vandalism. Cheers! E Wing (talk) 04:18, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Ah, I forgot about this one. This is the IP that puts obscene pictures in the sandbox and on his own talk page. Cute.--chaser - t 04:19, 19 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yeah. I already removed those obscene pictures from the sandboxes and IP pages. Really cute lol. E Wing (talk) 04:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

My site.
Why is my site being deleted? It is for my game. Information on something I am creating.(Courax (talk) 06:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC))


 * Please see WP:Notability. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 06:48, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

This means my information can not be posted on here? (Courax (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC))


 * Something like that, except if it gets noticed by others on a large scale. E Wing (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Rather ridiculous, but thanks anyways.(Courax (talk) 06:55, 1 December 2008 (UTC))


 * How long do I have to prove it a good site?/And are there any other sites like this one I might be able to use? (Courax (talk) 07:01, 1 December 2008 (UTC))


 * Actually there are other wiki sites to choose from, but if I where you, I'll start with my own site. Also, please see Wiki and Comparison of wiki software. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 07:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Apologies
Hello. Sorry for accidentally nuking your ref fixes at Barry Chamish earlier. I'm surprised it didn't report as an edit conflict. CIreland (talk) 14:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, it did report as an edit conflict, except it was on my side. Anyway, no harm done :-) E Wing (talk) 14:22, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! :)
I appreciate the information, and especially the link. What I had learned before (no link that time) was that page blanking by anons was NOT allowed. I always appreciate a hand from more experienced editors, and it is all the more valuable when it includes the link to the actual Wikipedia information. sinneed (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Also, I have shamelessly grabbed the look of your talk page banner, and used it on my own talk page. Thank you for that look as well. :) sinneed (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, its also my former belief that (talk)page blanking by anons is prohibited, until it was pointed out to me by some editors and/or admins in the IRC channel. As for the talkpage banner I also grabbed it from some user's page. Cheers! E Wing (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, there are many admins, myself included, that do not believe there is community consensus to allow the blanking of shared IP talk pages. In fact, the relevant section at WP:TALK is marked "under discussion".
 * Welcome back, by the way. I'm always happy to see your name at "Recent changes". — Satori Son 20:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

User page
I have deleted, restored and semi-protected your user page. There is a vandal running around that inserts a phone number on pages. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 15:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Erm, what phone number? E Wing (talk) 07:02, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Roopie
I have removed the speedy delete A1 tag you placed on this article. I think the saying that the subject is most known for appearing on SuicideGirls and giving a link to their profile on that website established a context from which they can be identified. Guest9999 (talk) 14:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Test Edit Jellymon Jan 9th 2009
Hello, I wasn't making a test edit. I was writing a new page. It's very difficult for new users to understand all the rules of wikipedia!

I feel my edit was more valuable than the information that was held on the page for "Jellymon". Is there not a way I can change it? and leave a link to the Digimon page, right now if you search the word Jellymon you get redirected, so I don't understand why writing a new entry but leaving the redirection option is against wikipedia's rules?

Thank you very much

Paul Paul Rohansmith (talk) 03:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * You may start out (and edit) your new article as Jellymon (studio), however your studio must satisfy WP:NOTABILITY. E Wing (talk) 14:59, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I think they satisfy the Notability. It was the first wiki entry I wanted to write, I have a few more about Chinese design/music but it's difficult to work out how to do. I can't work out how to start a new article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Rohansmith (talk • contribs) 03:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello
What do you mean its a school assigmnment/research? I posted it in the discussion too! (Tales23 (talk) 14:39, 12 January 2009 (UTC))

Regarding your tag on File:Idog-bk-toy-ohio-08.jpg
Please re-read CSD. The criteria exempts image, video or sound files and specifically notes that document file types and the like are meant to be targeted. An image which is unused, of poor quality and unencyclopedic (Assuming it is free content) must be taken to Images for deletion. Thank you. Protonk (talk) 20:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop vandalising people's posts when they're trying to improve Wikipedia articles. You can experiment undoing others edits in the sandbox. If you continue vandalising, you will be blocked. kthxbye! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjootle (talk • contribs) 12:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jim Emery
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jim Emery, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Jim Emery. Thank you. andy (talk) 16:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's ok, since I merely repositioned the template. E Wing (talk) 01:29, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for signaling
..but that page is really vandalised day after day by unnamed user who change username everyday and that page really need care and attention from administrators like you mister, so if you can do this, protecting that page, do it, because Its very hard to recover all bunch of junk of that user. thank you IslandShader (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually, you may report a certain page for protection by copying the Twinkle script to your monobook.js page (Firefox only), then click the RPP tag at the top right of the page. BTW, I am not an administrator (or atleast for now) :-) E Wing (talk) 11:27, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Ahemhalloffame
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 13:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Stephaniemusk
What did you have in mind with the proposed delete at User talk:Stephaniemusk? I would have just put a welcome message there. Agathoclea (talk) 15:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Nah nevermind. I was supposed to move back her talkpage from Talk:Beetle and Wedge, but I'll have the article talkpage be deleted as a test page. Feel free to do whatever you like. Thanks! E Wing (talk) 15:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)


 * That would have worked. WP:RM or contacting any admin would have done the trick easier than tagging pages in such more complex circumstances. Agathoclea (talk) 15:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Mistake?
Hi, E Wing! I saw that you have reverted an edit made by a new user at the help desk. I think that this was not vandalism, but the user was actually looking for help. However, as you said, the question was not a suitable one for the help desk. But in that case, we should direct them to the correct place or tell them that we cannot help them with their particular question (which is why we have these templates). Let's AGF and try to help them out, or someone that might become a good editor in the future may be scared away if they sense that this place is hostile IMHO. Cheers and happy editing :)  C h a m a l  talk 12:08, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that, although as per AGF I didn't warn the user about this. However thanks for the template link though! E Wing (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * No problems :) I see you're doing quite a good job here, btw. Nice to meet you.  C h a m a l  talk 12:23, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * See also Help desk/How to answer. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Am I blacklisted
Hi E Wing, just happened to see my messages it read that that I would be blocked for inserting external links. Was not aware of the wiki policy on external links. Wanted to check with you if I was blocked? How do I find out? How do I unblock myself? Steve Farnell (talk) 13:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Steve_Farnell


 * From your user contributions, it looks like that you are linking to a certain company's web page, which may thought of as a spam. However, the content of those pages (particularly the PDF files) may be the ones that you actually want to link it as an article's external link, although this may think of as a copyright violation.

Also, for your questions:


 * Please see this for the policies involved for the external links.
 * To see your account status, please click on the "User contributions" link on the lower left on your user (or user talk) page. At the "User contributions" page, please click the "block log" on the top to show your block status. A block log on that page will appear if you are block (although you may also be recieving a block tag on your talk page stating why you are blocked). You may also see this for more information.
 * To appeal on your block, please see this.

To be sure, you may talk to the one who gave your most recent warning, or ask (atleast) one of these administrators. Thanks and happy editing! E Wing (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank You EWing, I am not blocked. But I guess I was in doubt because I was using urls of a domain which has fallen under the blocked list. I may be partially responsible for it. Will follow your advice, and link it to only something specific on a pdf file or a book reference. Can I edit the links I has posted? I have quite a bit of interesting matter which would be cutting edge technology from Cypress. Is it okay to post these articles with appropriate references. 61.12.17.227 (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Steve_Farnell

Thank you E Wing
That was not a vandalism. One other Wiki - admin also asked about it. Let me share the answer with you as well.


 * The regulation was made in the assembly of NC and all NC's official public organizations adopted new change. For example, The ministry of Tourism of NC prepared a web site that used "northcyprus" in the address. Also, the private organizations are obliged to use the new form of name and hence web sites addresses of the privates were changed accordingly. For example: http://www.northcyprus.com, http://www.northcyprus.org etc. Also, the ministry's page is http://www.northcyprus.cc Also, almost all private companies completed the name change: For example: The Shipping firm Fergun: http://www.fergun.net Here, in this site, just look at the title page of the web site.


 * Unfortunately, there is no BOT in Wikipedia for such kinds of name changes. In the case of NC, it can be done easily. But what if it was a big country !!!


 * The Wiki-users in North Cyprus decided to change the wiki-page (you mentioned where "branding" occured) at the end. The Ministry of Tourism Web site of North Cyprus is http://www.northcyprus.cc . Also, when there is a quick adoptation of the new name: when you just google (http://www.google.com.tr) the "North Cyprus" and "Northern Cyprus", the following hit numbers occur: "North Cyprus": 1 450 000 and "Northern Cyprus": 815 000. But, don't forget to use quotation marks (" ") when googling since only in the quotationed case, the reality is seen very neatly. Thank you very much for your kind interest.


 * Dear Friend. You have very rightful for confusing, since one foreigner can easily confuse this. The usage is like that: Long Form: "The Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus" and the Short Form: " North Cyprus". The page you mentioned (http://www.kktcb.eu/index.php) is the Official Page of Presidency of TRNC. Just look at the page http://www.kktcb.eu/index.php and the menu above there once more: The links are: PRESIDENT & PRESIDENCY & PRESS OFFICE & DOCUMENTS & CONTACT & NORTH CYPRUS & E-DIRECTORY & E-LIBRARY. So, you gave the proof just yourself. Thanks a lot: As the legal name change is clear in the menu.


 * As for the "Move Tab" suggestion: It is very logical. Unfortunately, the old page is recreated for those who are unaware of the related name law. Hence, the old version is re-edited and redirecting tag is removed from them without knowing the issue. We opened this arguement in the deletion review page of Wikipedia ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2009_February_7 ) and the solution offered is that one.

You said "Reverted 1 edit by Cheapfriends identified as vandalism". I want to revert in the light of above explanations IF YOU GIVE CONSENT. Cheapfriends (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi E Wing, just a note, the above user is a now-blocked sock of prolific puppeteer User:VivaNorthCyprus. You might want to consider removing this section entirely for WP:DENY purposes.  AK Radecki Speaketh  00:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info, but I rather keep his/her note as record-keeping, although I do reverts on vandalism that majorly affects my user/user talk page/s. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 05:26, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Whois
I saw that you'd added to User talk:69.136.22.207. But as far as I can tell, Comcast is really just the ISP. Is that kind of tag really helpful for an IP that's just one of a few million? It's not a big deal, but I usually just see those tags on talk pages that belong to organizations with a few IPs. It's just a quibble - I'm glad someone does that maintenance work.  Will Beback   talk    05:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Pipipus
My friend, I only answer questions in my talk page. Regards, --Pipipus (talk) 17:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Even so. Wikipedia is not the host for your nonsense antics. E Wing (talk) 17:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

>:(
u werent nice to delete my page for no reason!!!!!!!>:p

sentry out sentry2Sentry2 (talk) 18:40, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but you created userpages for 2 non-existent users. Please see Speedy_deletions. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

speedy
You seem to have requested speedy deletion on M. F. Ashby,even though the article contained the information that he was a member of the Royal Society. Please see WP:PROF where you will find such membership listed as the actual example for what counts as the automatic qualification for notability. It went to AfD where it was a snow keep as Michael F. Ashby. DGG (talk) 03:02, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ochuko Tonukari
An article that you have been involved in editing, Ochuko Tonukari, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Ochuko Tonukari. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --AbsolutDan (talk) 17:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I just became involved when I restored the tags that was removed by the user. E Wing (talk) 17:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

But...
...the article meets the requirements of being referenced and so on, and this is precisely the comment I am making, so can the banner please come down now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PhysicsExplorer (talk • contribs) 03:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but there's a note on the tag, saying "Please do not remove or change this AfD message until the issue is settled". E Wing (talk) 06:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:My21cents
User talk:My21cents, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:My21cents and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User talk:My21cents during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

sock puppet
As you have been involved with Sockpuppet investigations/Fangthebigblackdog, can you check out User talk:Jay. Jay (talk) 08:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I've requested a copy of his deleted article to the deletor User:NawlinWiki. Interestingly enough, he installed a Twinkle script to his monobook.js. Will continue further surveillance after I recieve the copy. Thanks. E Wing (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I've received the copy of the said article (stated below is User:NawlinWiki's reply). I'd say that let's assume good-faith on this user, since there is a possibility that he is not the user as stated in the WP:SPI report, unless he starts vandalizing. If his (probable) vandalism edits are similar to the one stated in the report, we may also tag him into it. Thanks. 12:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Stong sid
Entire text was "new strong sad". The author, User:Fangoriously, then tagged it him/herself for speedy deletion. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:50, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply! E Wing (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User talk:My21cents
User talk:My21cents, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:My21cents & and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User talk:My21cents during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Xeltran (talk) 09:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

for transwikifying
It is now at User:E Wing/List of Master Grade Gundam model. When you've transwikified it, let me know and I will move it back and delete it. DGG (talk) 08:43, 21 April 2009 (UTC)