User talk:Eaaland

Howdy... b4 u post a page, be shure it contains what's in the header ;) Refering to the Einar Aaland page that for the time beeing contains the bio of Tor Andre Flo. Oyvind 09:41, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Vanity pages
Not to discourage you, but I have put up for deletion most of the articles you created today. As far as i can tell, they are what we call vanity pages, and are therefore not suitable for an encyclopdia.

Of course, oen can argue that that the existence of your company is in itself noteworthy. However, Owera is no Microsoft, and claims to the notability of your company must be provided (again, see the Vanity guidelines).

I hope you follow the discussion and perhaps add to some articles which do not necessarily concern yourself. Greets, The Minister of War 16:06, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

A encyclopedia is a collection of fects, and everything that was put is was pure facts. I even added much more usefull information to contribute to this medium. I will argue that Owera is noteworthy, both since we are represented in many industry events and therefore are the pioneers of the technical market we represent, and when it comes to setting standards in the market. I have also listed one of these standards for a start, so that people that wants to know more about the standard can search here. If you consider such a contribution as spam, then it will end here. Thanks

Spam
A tag has been placed on Owera, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Owera is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Owera. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. --NovaSTL 23:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)