User talk:Eab223

{{subst:GAN|subtopic=Culture, sociology and psychology}

Welcome!
Hello, Eab223, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reference Errors on 16 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 03:28, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * On the Educational psychology page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=581954576 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20Educational psychology Ask for help])

Your GA nomination of Educational psychology
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Educational psychology you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- 22:50, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The article is a lot of good work on an important and hard to cover topic.  But it's gonna need some work to get to GA.    I noticed that you nominated it days after it non-passed and haven't been around. I wrote a comment about a big "work needed" area April 5th with no response. I think that this will need to have somebody really involved to keep the nomination open and get it passed.  Do you see yourself as being in that role?   Sincerely,  North8000  (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Educational psychology
The article Educational psychology you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Educational psychology for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of North8000 -- North8000 (talk) 23:01, 5 May 2014 (UTC)