User talk:Eabrighi/sandbox

Emily, you did a good job of defining a registrar. As for formatting, I don't think you need the heading of "collection Roles". Having the definition paragraph first, without a heading and above the contents, gives the reader a quick overview of the role. Having a few more sources or using sources multiple times would make the article more reliable and acceptable to Wikipedia. KKuhn12 (talk) 21:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)KKuhn12 (Katrina Kuhn)

Hi Emily. Great job writing a description for the registrar. I think you did a great job describing some specific tasks like environmental controls, that a registrar would have to be familiar with. I think the collections roles header could have been taken out as well. One other thing I would love to have seen were links to other wikipedia sites, in case I had more questions. For example, I think accessions are a little confusing for non-museum people, so a link to an accession page might have been helpful. Or possibly examples from the collections management policies. Overall though, very good! Lani.odonnell (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2016 (UTC) (Lani O'Donnell)