User talk:EagleESi

Image copyright problem with Image:93 Eagle Vision ESi (3).jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:93 Eagle Vision ESi (3).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Chrsyler 3.3.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Chrsyler 3.3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Images
Just wanted to leave you a note to explain why the image you added to the Eagle Vision page was taken down. Infobox images should show the vehicle as clearly as possible and unfortunately the image that you added was not as clear as the one it replaced. The vehicles were much to small and the shot was taken at too low an angle. The current image isn't great and it would be cool to have a replacement, but it must be a real improvement in terms of giving a clear picture of what the vehicle looks like. You uploaded another image Image:93 Eagle Vision ESi (3).jpg which is almost good enough, but the trees are pretty distracting. There is a page with guidelines for taking pictures of cars but I haven't been able to find it, if I do I will let you know. Good luck editing in the future and if you have any questions feel free to ask. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:21, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for Atleast notifying me of it. I have now doen my best to present a better picture. If it does not fit just let me know again. THX!--EagleESi (talk) 03:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I have addressed my concerns with the new pic on my talk page. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:09, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Please review the Wikipedia policy regarding images of automobiles. Specific suggestions as listed here: WikiProject_Automobiles/Conventions.
 * The problem with the image that I replaced in the article about the Eagle Vision was that the two vehicles in the removed picture were not clearly shown. They were placed far from camera view and the entire image was overwhelmed (almost one-third of it) showing the grass in the foreground, as well as another major portion of the image devoted to the structure in the background. Although the other picture of the red car may have not been of your car, it clearly shows the front ¾ view up close and is thus superior to the image that you provided.
 * Please note that deleting improper images from Wikipedia is not the same as editing articles and their associated images for better quality or appearance of the subject. Thus, I do not know why you needed to copy and paste to my talk page the several step process involved with having a image erased from Wikipedia due to copyright or other serious problems. On the other hand, a contributing editor may deem it appropriate to change, remove, or add an image in an article; therefore, they are free to do so ... without prior or any notification.
 * Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia! — CZmarlin (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chrsyler 3.3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chrsyler 3.3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)