User talk:Eagles247/Archive 9

Brown
I did not know you can withdraw a tender. I thought you either sign it or you sign with another team and your old team gets comp. picks.  Osi  tadinma  20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * It's almost like releasing a restricted free agent from being restricted in a way. It's the same with the franchise/transition tags. When Corey Simon was with the Eagles, they applied the franchise tag to him after the 2004 season. He wasn't happy with it and the Eagles lifted the tag before he signed it (here).  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Good to know, I am glad cuz Brown sucked last year and with Grant in the lineup (never missed a game in a 9 year NFL career) our secondary got extremely better with Rolle and possibly Phillips playing again. So there is no excuse for D. Jackson to beat us deep. :)  Osi  tadinma  20:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Except that Grant is 31 years old and DeSean is 23.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Haha, You know what they say - Age is just a number.  Osi  tadinma  20:43, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Not for football =)  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right that Brett Favre sure is terrible. ;)-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 02:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * There are exceptions then. =)  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Ping
You've got mail.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 02:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm working on the reply now.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Huggle
Oh bother. Time to do a bit of content creation then, I suppose! Thanks for the headsup. Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC).

Deletion discussion
Hi Eagles247. I've recreated Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User talk:Ernie Chen Kok Weng as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:Ernie Chen Kok Weng. What should happen to the AfD discussion now (or will it just be closed in the fullness of time via the standard AfD process)? Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The AfD has already been closed. DH85868993 (talk) 07:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late response (I was asleep when you posted this), but anyway, admins and some non-admins close MfDs either after seven days have passed, or sometimes sooner if there is already consensus.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 22:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Re: userfy
Done. Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 22:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Message for Eagles247
I know numerous users told me not to add unnecessary details. I'm sorry. Do you know what's limit of info when I'm editing? When I'm editing, I try my best to figure out if I'm adding unnececessary details. How am I supposed to know which is unnecessary details? Can you give me examples of unnecessary details? --99.88.78.94 (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

When I edited article Disturbia(film), I said Kale punched his teacher because teacher asked, "What would your dad think?" Isn't it necessary for me to add that detail? --99.88.78.94 (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Fine I won't add a lot of details. I'll make sure it's not unnecessary details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.88.78.94 (talk) 04:15, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey Eagle, you probably already did, but checking the history of this user's talk page is instructive. They have a tendency to blank their talk page, esp. vandalism warnings (there's a nice collection of 'em there). Also, you may respond to them, but seeing as they have for instance been told a dozen times how to sign their messages, there may not be much of a point. Later, Drmies (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I am aware. I'm bored, my edit count is low for today, and I am assuming good faith with this user. However, AGF can only go so far, especially with a user who chooses to be dense.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  04:33, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

College Football Project request
Hello! You are listed as an active member of the College Football Project! We have a large number of unreferenced biographies of living persons, but it works out to be just two or three articles per active participant. I've divided up the articles that need help and put them in a table on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Unreferenced BLPs. Please assist the project by researching and sourcing the articles that have been "assigned" (so to speak) to you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


 * As a fellow member of the College Football project, I noticed that you have been removing your assignments from the table once completed. I would invite you to consider doing this: name of completed player and  once all are done.Let the other project members see and enjoy what you've done--Hokeman (talk) 17:55, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Paul McDonald put at the top of the table: "When you've completed adding sources, please remove the article from this table." Maybe you should add the message above to the top of the table so other users follow your suggestion and consistency is gained.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:40, 11 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Good idea! I'll do that and notify Paul McDonald of the change--Hokeman (talk) 18:43, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

 * Thanks!  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Re. ANI on Civil War
Capture of Tucson clearly did occur in 1862, the city changed hands. The fact is presented in all accounts of Arizona's history (cf. Tucson: The Life and Times of an American City By C. L. Sonnichsen page 61 ...), but is it worth of a separate article besides History of Tucson, Arizona ? no comment on other "hoaxes" mentioned. East of Borschov (talk) 02:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The only reason I thought it was a hoax was because it was created by a now-indef blocked sockpuppet of another indef blocked user. It was a battle during the Civil War, so I guess it deserves a separate article.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  03:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks.
You're the fifth editor I've had to thank tonight. :) - JuneGloom07    Talk?  22:01, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem. The vandals that jump IP addresses are the worst.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  22:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * So I've discovered. Btw, I know the barnstar says Userpage shield, but I'm not sure if there is a talk page one. I should probably go have a look. - JuneGloom07    Talk?  22:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think one exists. I think they should change the name of this barnstar to "The Userspace Shield" so it can apply to userpages, user talk pages, subpages, etc.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  22:10, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

No problem
No problem! :) -Tommy2010 10:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

No Problem.--Yankees10 15:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

How ya been!?
Im so freaking happy that Miami got Brandon Marshall!!!! The best part is that we didnt have to trade our 1st round pick. Stealthninja545 (talk) 01:10, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, but he CERTAINLY didnt play like one. So I say, "F*** him". He should just stick to being a kick returner. Stealthninja545 (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Undrafted FAs
Not sure, if you're planning on updating the templates with undrafted FAs but here are three really good places to find the signings since Rotoworld doesn't report them: Cheers,-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 20:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * Thanks for the links, I'm not sure how active I'll be, but I'll do the best I can. BTW how 'bout Mike Kafka!  Eagles   24/7  (C)  21:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I saw! Good to see the article not get destroyed after him being picked. Also, good to see three other player articles I worked on (Arthur Jones (American football), D'Anthony Smith and Geno Atkins) get drafted.-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 21:37, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Deleting NFL team articles
You said that the preseason doesn't count as playing in the professional level. Can a player page be made if he makes the PS? RevanFan (talk) 00:29, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Sadly, no. If he makes the active roster, you can create the page for him. I don't necessary agree, but that's what was decided.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:20, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know why, but that kinda makes me angry. Anyway, I don't get it. I was allowed to create a page for Herb Donaldson when he was on the PS. It never got put up for deletion and is just getting more people adding onto it. Is there any way I can put that rule up for debate? RevanFan (talk) 02:48, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I started a discussion about that in November (here), and nothing was really changed. Right now there is an RfC about WP:ATH at WT:BIO, but it's such a long thread and I have no idea what the result is/was. Participate there if you want to debate the PS players, but the guidelines are pretty lenient right now in regards to NFL requirements. Some people even wanted to change the requirements so that only players who played an entire season get articles.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Ehh...it depends if I (or someone else) who will strictly enforce the decision at AfD sees it, the article will get nominated. At this point, I don't care enough to nominate Donaldson but if I see an UDFA article I'll nominate (only at the end of camp for me, right now would be too hard to get it through AfD without the full understanding of UDFAs by non-NFL editors).-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 01:20, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Infobox NFLactive
Is there a reason why you changed  to   here? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. --bender235 (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pretty much the same reason you removed the,  ,   and   fields. It makes no difference to the appearance of the infobox and we both just have different preferences on how the infobox should look code-wise. You can change it back if you would like, but it really makes no difference.  Eagles   24/7   (C)  19:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * There is one major difference between what you did and what I did. My edit reduced the amount of code, by deleting parameters that would've been void anyway, while your edit replaced a standard parameter with the longer work-around version, which—sorry for repeating myself—makes no sense at all. --bender235 (talk) 22:19, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I still don't think it matters much, but I'll change it back anyway.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:27, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The currentposition thing allows for the position to be potentially pipe-linked if necessary or to have two positions listed at the same time. If the player were to be an RB at the beginning of his career and then get a shot at being a kick returner it saves time if that happens. And since the result is the same either way it's not like it's crystal balling to use the  format.


 * The  stuff is there to be filled in when the player retires or potentially dies. These fields also sort of serve as "free promotion" for the fact the NFLactive now handles retired players and coaches.


 * That's the best way to describe it and the only reasons I can come up with for why the majority of NFL editors (including myself) do it. Cheers,-- Giants 27  ( Contribs  |  WP:CFL ) 02:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay, let's leave it at that. --bender235 (talk) 07:37, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

CFPA
This has nothing to do with our discussion above, but as a member of the WikiProject College football, could you please leave a comment here? Thanks. --bender235 (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Commented.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  02:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thnaks. --bender235 (talk) 07:38, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Eagles QB's #
How can two QB's have the same number? Sure it is a mistake.  Osi  tadinma  20:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Nevermind it was an typo on your part. How can you get Kafka's number wrong since you worked so hard on his article. :)  Osi  tadinma  20:57, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess I was confused by his decision not to take his college number 13 even though it was available.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:59, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * It was a typo, and Pats fixed it hours ago.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:55, 28 April 2010 (UTC)