User talk:Eakers4

Just in case you get confused with what I've done, I've listed the deletion discussion about Robert Stanek seperately from that on his books; I feel the arguments for deleting the pages on his books don't really apply to a page about the author.

I'm not sure if those who've already voted would want to delete it - I guess they would, but I can't be sure, so I removed the votes you'd copied across from the Ruin Mist discussion.

The deletion discussion is now at Articles for deletion/Robert Stanek for the page on the author, and Articles for deletion/Ruin Mist for the ones on the fiction. Both are now listed seperately on the Articles for deletion page. Shimgray | talk | 01:37, 19 February 2006 (UTC)


 * I've now left a note for everyone who already left a comment at the Ruin Mist discussion pointing out the second debate. Shimgray | talk | 01:45, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Deletions on Robert Stanek
Hello, you seem to be blanking the Robert Stanek article.

Note that many people would consider blanking stuff you don't happen to like vandalism and at least very naughty. Also, blanking the page while it is in Articles for Deletion is not appropriate solely because the article is being deleted; AfD is a debate on whether or not the article should be deleted and no article is deleted without clear consensus, so the articles should be treated as normal during this period.

If you have objections about the article's content, please tag the article or section with accuracy and voice your objections on Talk:Robert Stanek, preferrably in form of information that might be more accurate.

Thank you in advance for your consideration. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 01:54, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Canadian Association of Snowboard Instructors
A tag has been placed on Canadian Association of Snowboard Instructors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. βcommand 01:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)