User talk:Ealdgyth/2015 Arb Election votes

Correction
Ealdgyth, you have an interesting framework to analyze candidates although my own criteria differs from yours...but reading your evaluation helps me see different sides to the candidate. Any way, I just wanted to point out that Opabinia regalis is an admin and has, in fact, unlike any other candidate, has passed two RfAs. Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I've corrected that, although in the end, admin status doesn't really mean that much to me either way. Ealdgyth - Talk 20:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for this very thorough guide! You've missed the green highlight for Kudpung on "5 articles with over 100 edits." Likewise Rich Farnborough, and AKS, if you're intending to do them all the same. Johnbod (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Comment
I note you highlight my department of fun edits. In my first few years here I was rather addicted to the word association games, which often lead to the creation or improvement of articles needed for them. However, I've not played them at all regularly for several years - if I have 40 edits in the past 3 years to those pages I'll be very surprised. Thryduulf (talk) 14:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

"...freeze your face into whatever bad expression you've made..."
The truth hurts, doktor. 75.108.94.227 (talk) 03:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, I started reading the list, from the top, scrolling down, and got to Timtrent, but I had to stop and leave a note here because it's SO EXCITING! I don't know why but I'm totally giddy--will Ealdgyth think I'm OK? Wait, what if she doesn't like me? I've been trying to rack up some article edits the last few days! Drmies (talk) 03:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * But......ANI is fun, and it needs me! Also, my GAs and FAs and stuff are on the old version of my user page, and now on the new and improved one. There's a few there, though not enough. Hey, at least you don't hate me, that's something. Drmies (talk) 05:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)