User talk:Eamonmurphy83

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palatine GAA (October 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Palatine GAA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Palatine GAA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Palatine_GAA Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gene93k&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Palatine_GAA reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Tone
Hiya. Subjective and editorial turns of phrase (like "hoodoo" or "the scoreline didn't reflect their dominance") may work OK in a sports journalist's commentary on the back-pages of a newspaper. But they are not in keeping with the guidelines on encyclopedic tone on this project. In particular, if someone's subjective opinion is being expressed, it should be attributed and cited. Cheers and happy editing. Guliolopez (talk) 08:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)