User talk:Eanschuessler

I reverted this page to remove your contributions: we still have the right to edit earlier versions. If you wish to insist it is kept, for existing in the page history, I will delete the page and find a way to restore the article. Wikipedia is not a soapbox; and we will thank you not to use it as one. -- Jim Regan 20:28, 29 May 2004 (UTC)

I have also changed Ean Schuessler; your additions were not encyclopaedic. As I've gotten off to a bad start with my comments above, I'll try to rectify that. Your contributions are welcome, but please be aware that we have standards we wish to maintain. The most important of these is our NPOV policy. We have other standard practices (though I can't for the life of me track them down at the moment :) - we don't ask that you agree with them; we do ask that you follow them, or provide good reason not to, and help us to refine them.

If you ever need editing help visit How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump.

If you wish to edit Ean Schuessler, perhaps you might use one of our existing biographies as a guideline.

I've just read the comment you left on my talk page; I'll address your comments here.


 * "You are inviting further perfectly legal harassment from me."

As I said, if you wish, I can delete your modifications from the page history if you require this. I would rather not do this, as reinstating the rest of the version history is not currently practical; it would require some effort on my part to ensure that proper attribution is maintained, but I am prepared to do this, and I am sure many others are too.


 * "What if I start continuously modifying this entry so that you have to keep an endless history with my changes?"

Then we will treat you as a vandal, and revert every contribution you make on sight; if you persist we will block your account. You are perfectly free to create another, but experience tells me that people will notice your editing patterns and habits: those accounts will be blocked too.


 * "you would be abridging freedom of expression in the interest of enforcing a bad license."

Firstly, I agree that it is a bad licence, but this is a problem that is being addressed, slowly but surely. The important thing to me is the intention: we want Wikipedia to be free, and will find a way for it to properly be so. The GFDL was chosen, I think, out of trust in the Free Software Foundation, as a documentation licence that allowed documents to be shared in the same way that the GPL allows software to be.

That hasn't turned out to be true, but I think the consensus is that it's preferable for the FSF to fix the brain damages of their licence rather than try to track down every Wikipedia contributor to have a licence change (and even in that event, there doesn't seem to be any documentation specific licence without its own problems).

Wikipedia isn't about freedom of expression, it is a project to build an encyclopaedia, written from the Neutral Point of View. We do not allow people to express their own personal views in articles; we attribute views, try to balance the pros and cons of a subject, and only use that information for which we can provide verifiable references (which, by the way, is why I had to modify Ean Schuessler). Please don't take offence to the analogy, but it is similar to Debian in a way: Debian does not allow any random piece of software to be part of the distribution; there are guidelines and standards to be followed. I got most of the way through the new maintainer queue in Debian, and some day hope to finish the process: I don't fully agree with a few of Debian's decisions, but I was, would be, and am fully prepared to follow them to the best of my ability.

I don't think you can condemn us too quickly, though, for any action we take to avoid the use of the worst parts of a bad licence :)


 * "This isn't about using Wikipedia as a soapbox. This is about Wikipedia selecting a bad license and a concerned citizen demonstrating weaknesses in it."

As I said, Wikipedia picked a bad licence out of a bad bunch--despite Debian's fondness for it, I don't think too many other people consider the GPL fit to be a licence for text. The Village Pump or the Mailing lists are the proper places to have a discussion like this. Of course, you are new to Wikipedia, and therefore it is unreasonable to expect you to know this.

(Oh, where I used "we", I should have said "my interpretation of our policy and intentions" etc. Others may correct me on some points, but I can only offer my own opinion).

-- Jim Regan 21:26, 29 May 2004 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Eanschuessler.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eanschuessler.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use GFDL-self to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rossrs 23:36, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Bridge maxims
Hi, that was a good try with the 3NT edit but unfortunately the context is wrong. The gambling 3NT is a very specific opening bid and was not being referred to by Hamman. I look forward to seeing some more edits on bridge related articles. Abtract 16:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Debian Social Contract
Hi Ean! Following your comment on my talk page about the redirect to this article, I've added a paragraph that covers the DSC's basic history and background, as agreed in your bio's AFD. While there would be some amount of COI here, since this is the DSC's article and not your bio, I don't see the problem with you expanding that as you see fit, provided you properly source your changes and additions, as per WP:CITE. If you have any questions or concerns, or need some help, don't hesitate to let me know. Thank you again for reminding me :) § FreeRangeFrog croak 23:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)