User talk:Earnold97/sandbox

I think you have a good start on editing your article. There was one citation I was worried about; however, it was cited in the article. I do see that Liz mentioned that the term usage of “it is vital” may not be okay because of it conflicting with having a neutral tone. I noticed that the treatment section within the article is already lengthy, were you going to strictly focus on just the treatment section or were you going to expand into some of the other ones? Also, I clicked on the ISBN for the first reference, and it took me to the book sources page, but when I asked it to pull up the book it did not do that, but I am not sure why. Overall your edits are very good.Kwhitlow2413 (talk) 06:38, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Katie, I appreciate all your insight and analysis concerning my article edits. I have further investigated and edited parts of my article to address both Dr. Rahn and your concerns. I have eliminated the phrase "It is vital" to pursue research and investigation of treatment for generalized anxiety disorder. I have also eliminated some of my own wordiness within my draft. Furthermore, I investigated your remarks concerning the link to the ISBN code of my first reference. I understand that it did not take you take you directly to an electronic version of the book. However, if you click on the ISBN code within the reference, it will direct you to a Wikipedia search function to identify the book. You may subsequently click the "search" button and it will allow you the opportunity to view the book on some other platforms. Such platforms include, Google Books and openlibrary.org. However, you may still not be able to view a complete version of the book. Websites such as Scribd allow one to view you whole editions of books, and may allow you register for a free trial to view the section of the book referenced. In regards to your comments on my sole address of the treatment section of the article, I decided to focus on the treatment specifically of generalized anxiety disorder. However, I may decide to additionally contribute to other sections of the article. Nevertheless, I appreciate any and all insight in regards to my current and future works. Thank you for all your time and consideration!Earnold97 (talk) 02:59, 25 February 2019 (UTC)