User talk:Earthbillion

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc. (LPI), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  Falkirks Talk   14:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for August 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lupin Pharmaceuticals, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Generics, Generic and Pharma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
I notice you have been editing onloy the page on Lupin Pharmaceuticals,so it is possible that you have a conflict of interest. If so, I remind you of our rules on Conflict of Interest. In particular, if you are associated with the organization, either directly or as a paid editor, you must declare this. See our Terms of Use, particularly with respect to paid contributions without disclosure  DGG ( talk ) 04:41, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lupin Pharmaceuticals


A tag has been placed on Lupin Pharmaceuticals, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  DGG ( talk ) 14:55, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Lupin data
The claims to be the largest, ( or 2nd, 3rd, etc. largest ) producer of a drug, or the fastest growing company in a segment, must every individual one of them have a reliable third party source, or they will be removed. Nonspecific claims to be "on the the leading" and similar vague statements ware never appropriate.  DGG ( talk ) 04:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)