User talk:Earthsales5

Welcome!


Hello, Earthsales5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
 * Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who put a certain post on a talk page. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
 * Check out some of these pages:
 * New contributors' help page | Help
 * Where to ask questions | Frequently asked questions
 * Introduction to Wikipedia | Guide to Wikipedia
 * The simplified ruleset for Wikipedia | Manual of Style
 * Things to work on at Wikipedia
 * If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out Questions, [ ask me on my talk page], or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! —Ute in DC (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Circumcision. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg (talk) 19:00, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * I make constructive additions of new and fitting information, which you edit war away, jayg.Earthsales5 (talk) 18:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I would recommend you take some time to review how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia is based on discussion and consensus. Continued reverting of others edits without consensus developed on the talk page may lead to your editing ability being restricted. All the best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

WP:MEDRS
Review articles must be used to support medical content. Please use reviews. Thanks. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 21:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
You appear to be edit warring at colonoscopy and are very close to being blocked. You must use review article for controverial content. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Your characterization of the JAMA article is wrong. Please see this review as well http://www.springerlink.com/content/h084847226828772/ Earthsales5 (talk) 17:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I do not see where "review" articles must be used, as JAMA published articles comply with WP:MEDRS. Whe do you object to the external link?  Finally, why do you view using sigmoidoscopy as a screen for colonoscopy as "controverial" (your spelling is worse than mine!).Earthsales5 (talk) 17:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)