User talk:Eassin

Don't know where to put this, but according to the QI Annual Book E, your name means lust for bulls and cannot be successfully googld. It cliams this is the only result.

List of social networking websites
Awesome piece of formatting! You've improved the look no end. Congratulations. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) 15:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 04:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I replied to your question on my talk page. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

zircon merge
Please don't merge articles without consensus or discussion. The only comment on Talk:Zircon was an oppose. I have reverted your merge. Vsmith 17:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Two million
Looks like you did it. Congratulations! Durova Charge! 08:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, congrats!--65.95.96.153 15:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Any thoughts on this?
I raised this issue on the talk page of El Hormiguero, just wondered if you had any thoughts on the question of who should be credited with creating the article. DustyPeg1945 10:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Erlangen Program
Hello Eassin! I'm glad to see somebody working on this article. If you know this material, is there any chance you'd be able to find references as well? The new stuff added over the past year generally has been unreferenced to Klein's work. My guess is that most people who know enough math to contribute here have learned the Erlangen material from other textbooks. In that case, mentioning the textbook used would be helpful to our readers, and the references to Klein might be figured out later. EdJohnston 17:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Help desk
I responded to your question on the Help Desk here Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk • contribs) 20:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Quite Interesting
You are mentioned on the very last page of a book called "The QI Annual". It dictates that "eassin" is actually a word, so rare, it can't be googled, only found as a name for a contributer for Wikipedia (ie. you). --86.151.99.217 (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Timeline of environmental history
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Timeline of environmental history, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Timeline of environmental events. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Alternative definition of derivative
In the article "Non-Newtonian calculus", the section now called "Alternative definition of derivative" is not appropriate, because most readers are not familiar with that approach to the derivative concept, and so it complicates matters by trying to do too many things at the same time. I do think that "Alternative definition of derivative" would be appropriate for a new Wikipedia article. Smithpith (talk) 20:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolf minimum


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Wolf minimum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Ï¿½ (talk) 19:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Eigenvector centrality and PageRank
From the edit history of the subsection Eigenvector Centrality, it seems that you are the one who edited the sentence "Google's PageRank is a variant of the Eigenvector centrality measure" into the article. Would you care to explain this claim? For eigenvector centrality, we want to find the Perron vector of a $$\{0,1\}$$ adjacency matrix. For PageRank, we want to find the Perron vector of a column stochastic matrix. Now a $$\{0,1\}$$ adjacency matrix is a column stochastic matrix if and only if it is a permutation matrix. So, apart from this trivial case (where the Perron vector is the all-one vector and everyone has equal ranking/centrality), the two problems are fundamentally different and we cannot cast one into another. So, in what sense is PageRank a variant of eigenvector centrality?The suffocated (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Electrical analogies
I see that you have put a lot of electrical theorems and models into category:electrical analogies. I don't think that this is really right. Theorems and models are not analogies. SpinningSpark 23:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * To make that a bit clearer, one can form a mechanical network by analogy with an electrical network. Tellegen's theorem can then be applied to the analogously formed mechanical network.  That does not make Tellegen's theorem itself an analogy as your categorisation would have it.  It is a theorem being applied to an analogy.  In the same way, Kirchhoff's laws and Ohm's law can be applied to it, and I'm sure you will agree that they are not analogies. SpinningSpark 07:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I see that you have been editing yesterday since I made this comment. Since you have chosen not to reply and explain your thinking, I'm going to revert the Tellegen's theorem change and any others I come across. SpinningSpark 14:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

I thought electrical analogies meant a broad generalization of electrical engineering applying lumped element models and network analysis to anything that meets certain criteria, such as Tellegen's theorem. It sounds like you want electrical analogies to mean just parallels to elements in the models, not the parallels in modelling? How about we work on improving both the electrical analogy articles and the modelling articles? Eassin (talk) 15:04, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It can mean that, or it can mean an analogy (such as the hydraulic analogy) developed to help teach electrical engineeering. I don't disagree with you understanding of analogies, but I don't see how the generalisation you are making justifies the categorisation.  Just because Tellegen's theorem is obeyed by both the analogous systems, does not make Tellegen itself the analogy.  Another example is the inverse square law.  One can form an analogy between gravity and opical illuminance which both obey this law for point sources.  So does electrical flux density.  So does magnetic field strength.  But I don't think that means we should put the inverse square law in the categories gravitational analogies, optical analogies, electrical analogies, magnetic analogies etc etc etc.  Almost every law in any field of physics will have analogies in every other field.  It would be just silly to start identifying all these laws as being analogies of multiple fields. In Wikipedia terms, we should categorise articles as electrical analogies only if the article identifies itself as being an electrical analogy. SpinningSpark 16:08, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Resistance-Reluctance Model (October 6)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Resistance-Reluctance Model may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Eassin Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CaptainEek&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Eassin reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 19:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Resistance-Reluctance Model


Hello, Eassin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Resistance-Reluctance Model".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:58, 22 April 2020 (UTC)