User talk:East Flatbush Live

January 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jesse Hamilton has been reverted. Your edit here to Jesse Hamilton was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/user/NYSenate/videos) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 15:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

March 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Jesse Hamilton, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 13:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Jesse Hamilton. For deliberately introducing falsehoods in the article to serve your political agenda, presumably an agent or other COI of subject of article not wishing to be associated with the Republican party despite clear sourcing. JesseRafe (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

East Flatbush Live (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)♥(User talk:East Flatbush Live) This is my first time using Talk, so sorry if I don't yet understand the format. There is vague and purposely misleading language on the Senator Hamilton wikipedia page. It says that he and the IDC "support Republican leadership once elected." However, if you look at the public record you will see that his voting record is very strongly Democratic, including his vote for leadership of the NY Senate. The specific vote that best shows that the public record contradicts this statements was on January 4, 2017, when he voted for Democratic leadership (a.k.a. Temporary President of the State Senate) and NOT for Senator John Flanagan, who won with 32 votes by Senators elected as Republicans versus the 31 votes for Democratic leadership. While the NY Times refers to Senator Hamilton and the IDC as "Rogue Democrats" (whatever that means), he still supports Democrat causes, Democratic legislation, is a member of a 100% Democratic conference, and he's the Secretary of the Kings Country Democratic Party. So what does it mean to say that Sen. Hamilton "support[s] Republican leadership?" I think it is a meaningless description that serves a partisan purpose. What specific vote can anyone point to that supports this statement? And does a selective reading of the NY Times have more credibility than the New York State Senate website, the official public record of Senator Hamilton's actual votes and statements? I would like to thoroughly disprove the statement that I have "deliberately introduc[ed] incorrect information." So please advise me on the best format. East Flatbush Live (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)East Flatbush Live


 * You're willfully misinterpreting the facts to suit your viewpoint. The whole IDC supports Republican leadership in a power-sharing arrangement. That means that they get leadership positions in committees that otherwise only go to the majority party, and Klein gets to be Senate Leader 1A and the "three men in a room" is now "four men in a room". This committee leadership by the majority party aspect is common in almost all legislative bodies in the US, and the fact that the 8 nominal Democrats are caucuses with the GOP in the Senate is the only reason why they have these committee chairmanships. That's what that means. There are hundreds of articles that explicitly state this, we only need to cite one. And an impartial paper of record is a reliable source, whereas your subjective analysis of individual votes is not a valid metric as it relies on your personal viewpoint and inferences about what you think "Democrat causes" and "Democratic legislation" is. JesseRafe (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


 * East Flatbush Live I’m questioning your accusation, user:JesseRafe, of me violating the “neutral point of view” by objecting to your phrase “nominal democrat.” Jesse Hamilton is registered member of the Democratic Party and a Secretary of the Kings County Democratic Party.  Those two facts are neutral and verifiable- his registration is easily available at the New York State Board of Elections.  The use of the phrase “nominal democrat” is value-laden and not fact-based.  I would be glad to address other issues as well at a later time.     East Flatbush Live (talk) 15:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)East Flatbush Live

April 2018
I'd like to know from user:JesseRafe if the essence of your argument is that Senator Hamilton caucuses with the GOP. East Flatbush Live (talk) East Flatbush Live (talk) 22:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)East Flatbush Live.