User talk:Eastgarden

September 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Paul Hoover has been reverted. Your edit here to Paul Hoover was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://tuoitrenewsblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/nguyen-trais-poetry-recited-in-english.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:10, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Huy Duc


A tag has been placed on Huy Duc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TheMesquito buzz  00:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Huy Duc
I want to thank you for writing the article Huy Duc. I have expanded it quite a bit, and I have nominated it for Wikipedia's "Did you know...?" feature. That nomination was approved, and an item about the article will appear on Wikipedia's front page, in the "Did you know...?" section, sometime soon. --MelanieN (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Huy Duc
Allen3 talk 08:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Huy Duc
Hello! You have been proposing to delete the article Huy Duc. But the article cannot be deleted using the WP:PROD system, because the person appears to be notable. The only mechanism for deleting this article would be to nominate it for deletion at a a deletion discussion. If some of the facts are incorrect; please say exactly what is incorrect, so we can fix it. Thank you. --MelanieN (talk) 09:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * I see that you tried again. I understand that you are the original creator of this article, but that does not mean you get to delete it. Other people have worked on the article and I believe it meets Wikipedia's criteria to stay here. Please stop adding a PROD tag. If you wish, I will take it to the community for a discussion, but I believe it will be kept. --MelanieN (talk) 15:35, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Huy Duc for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huy Duc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Huy Duc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 06:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Just to explain: You keep trying to delete the article. So I have listed it at Articles for deletion. There will be a community discussion about the article and whether we should keep it or not. Do not remove the Articles for Deletion tag from the article. Please come to the discussion, located at Articles for deletion/Huy Duc, to explain why you want to delete it. Thank you. --MelanieN (talk) 06:19, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
Since the community decision was to keep the article, you MUST NOT add speedy deletion tags. The deletion tags will be removed. If you keep adding them, it will be disruptive, and could even cause you to be blocked from editing. --MelanieN (talk) 17:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you have done repeatedly at the article Huy Duc. You must stop adding deletion tags. The community has decided, at Articles for deletion/Huy Duc, that the article should be kept. MelanieN (talk) 03:03, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Black Dog, Black Night moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Black Dog, Black Night, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 12:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Black Dog, Black Night


Hello, Eastgarden. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Dog".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)