User talk:Eastmain/Archive 7

 ''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting  --  at the end. [ Start a new talk topic.]''

Powerwave Technologies page
Since I'm new, I'm not sure how to send you a barnstar award or where to talk really, but wanted to thank you for saving the Powerwave Technologies page from deletion. I really appreciate your help!Syee13 (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Balboa Bay Club
Thank you. It looks much better. Now...to expand it...and I've only been there once.....

Regards. --Manway (talk) 08:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eci Telecom Logo 2008-07-26.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Eci Telecom Logo 2008-07-26.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 09:56, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Road Safe America Logo 20071226.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Road Safe America Logo 20071226.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:27, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Screenshot riffworks instantdrummer big.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Screenshot riffworks instantdrummer big.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 03:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lord Abbett Knight Logo.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Lord Abbett Knight Logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Ontario Khalsa Darbar
Wow, thanks for the cites. I added them and some more. Bearian (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Rescuing pages from deletion
Just dropping you a quick note to express my admiration for your whole approach vis-a-vis articles nominated for speedy deletion, etc. Indeed, I think I may pass articles that I would normally tag for WP:SPEEDY on to you for initial review in the future, rather than just going the deletion route outright (except in cases of obvious nonsense, etc.). Why not? Either way, good work! Ginsengbomb (talk) 17:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hambone Magazine 118.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Hambone Magazine 118.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  06:05, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Covent Garden Hotel
HI, cheers for adding those sources. I personally think 5 star hotels in London are amongst the world's elite hotels, well that is fact. I am pretty sure this article could be fully expanded given time but it is barely a day old.... Dr. Blofeld       White cat 20:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Eastland Park Hotel
Thank you for rewriting the article. :)  The left orium  22:00, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

St Osyth Mahala Wood
You indicate that this article may infringe copyright as it came from the www.bures-online.co.uk Correct. Not only am I the author of this article I am also the researcher and owner of the same material on the Bures web site. Therefore there is no copyright infringement. The Wikepedia submission is only a very brief outline of the main research

Alan 17/12/2009 Buresstmary (talk) 18:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MassiveGood


The article MassiveGood has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable project.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TN X Man 20:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Villanovan Front Page May 3 2007.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Villanovan Front Page May 3 2007.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:50, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:International Committee on Measurements and Instrumentation
It's alright. My message was just more of a heads-up to the editor I posted it to that they should look for possible redirects/merges instead of immediately requesting a CSD deletion. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 15:47, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Naples Grape Festival
I did some minor copyediting and found cites. No big deal. Bearian (talk)

Your request at the spam blacklist talk page
Hello Eastmain. Recently you helped find references for a new article, and in connection with that you suggested that a certain link be removed from the local blacklist. There is a long and embarrassing story behind the blacklisting, which followed a heavy spam campaign that eventually led to a series of indefinite blocks. Checkusers helped find all the accounts responsible. A staff member of the institute appears to be involved. I was going to post a bunch of links, but this risks exposing the problem further. Would you be willing to consider withdrawing your request? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:50, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I did not realize that per-article un-blacklisting was possible. Hu12's action seems to take care of it. EdJohnston (talk) 06:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * With regards to this, I've removed the text you added about Anil Rajvanshi. That individual is the person behind User:Akraj and related sockpuppets, and he has been using Wikipedia as his personal PR board for a long time. If we mention the achievements, we should be certain to avoid anything that rewards him for his abuse of the system. --Ckatz chat spy  07:34, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * How about the abuse of the system by Ckatz —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.254.23.227 (talk) 06:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello Eastmain. As you can see only because of you this page on Nimbkar Agricultural Research Institute has survived. The editor Ckatz seems to have something personal against some body from this Institute. However I feel this Institute is doing good work in India. With your long standing in Wiki is it possible to unblock the Institute site? Canadianuser (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

TVN Indonesia
Thanks for correcting me re. the notability of TV stations. I'm not particularly well versed in the field - could you clarify for me what "licensed" means in this context, so I don't make the same mistake again? (FWIW I have a verifiability concern with this article too - the official site is blank and I'm seeing nothing much on Google to establish whether the thing exists - but that's another conversation). Gonzonoir (talk) 15:26, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Notability of radio and television stations
 * The guideline can be found at Notability_(media). A licensed station is one which has permission to broadcast from the appropriate government agency, such as the Federal Communications Commission in the United States or Ofcom in the United Kingdom. In some countries, very-low-power stations do not require a licence. I am not sure which agency in Indonesia is the broadcast regulator, but if you can find the agency, it may have a list of the country's broadcasting stations on its website. One difficulty in writing articles about radio and television stations is that the government may refer to a station by its callsign (WABC-TV, for example) or the name of the company, while the station may refer to itself by a marketing name (770 Top Radio, perhaps). - Eastmain (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Great, thank you. I have found the Indonesian broadcast commissioner's site but will need some time to navigate it (my Indonesian is, er, patchy!). Meanwhile I've commented on the article talk page to see if anyone else can help. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Ruthven College
Hi there. Thanks for adding those refs. I think there is still a significant problem that we have no RS for what the name of this college will be, unless I missed something the name Ruthven College is unverifiable. Polargeo (talk) 06:50, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I have edited the article in a way that I hope will address those concerns. Please take a look. - Eastmain (talk) 10:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pavel E. Smid
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pavel E. Smid, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --Deskford (talk) 10:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of MassiveGood
I have nominated MassiveGood, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/MassiveGood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TN X Man 17:59, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Just a more personal note here that I could not find any reliable sources to support this article. If there are some that I missed, please let me know. Cheers! TN X Man  18:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Blue Coat
To be honest, although I've been an admin for many years, I have no idea how to restore a history, you may need to make it a more general admin request  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Consco Enterprises
Thank you for your research on the article I started about Consco Enterprises. I'm sure you contribution will delay deletion until more substantial references can be researched. I feel that Consco has historical significance in the computing field for being the first to successfully incorporate a manual system of accounting into a large scale enterprise computing product. Having worked for the company I have much anecdotal information which, unfortunately, is difficult to verify from published sources. I am continuing to look and would appreciate any suggestions you might have.

Stanmichalowski (talk) 16:02, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Invitation
I am sorry to see so many of your articles up for deletion. I really agree with your "all high schools are notable" argument. I have seen you around and like your work. I would like to invite you to a project I am involved in,

RE: disambiguation of Quebec placenames
I completely agree with you i have moved the article to Saint-Sébastien, Le Granit, Quebec. I just created the page with the name i found in the list, and i much rather have it work with fr:Saint-Sébastien (Le Granit). Cheers  Kyle  1278  19:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

AFD for Molly Conlin
I've just closed your AFD on Molly Conlin, as you didn't actually propose that the article be deleted. (I'm not sure what you were trying to accomplish with the nomination...maybe there is a really good reason for it I just missed?) Just dropping you a note to let you know what I've done. —  æk Talk 05:17, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Could please you reopen it? Another editor thought the article should be deleted. - Eastmain (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
—  æk Talk 05:24, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Ospina Coffee
Thank you very much for your most valuable help and contribution. Now my challenge is to insert these references into the article. I am a novice and cyber iliterate. Nevertheless, I truly appreciate your input. Thanks, --Grancafe (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weihwa Chinese School
Hi, are we sure this is a high school? I haven't found anything about what age range they teach. TerriersFan (talk) 23:48, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * See http://weihwa.schools.officelive.com/CoursesProspectus.aspx, which lists specific courses. The later courses (particularly those that make reference to SAT) are for high school students. This is a weekend school for teaching Chinese as a second language and other sujects, rather than a five-day-a-week school. I had not realized this at first. - --Eastmain (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

IDiscoveri Education - Thank you for your feedback and help.
Dear Eastmain,

Sincerely appreciate your time and guidance in improving the article. Thanks a lot.

Regards, IDiscoveri (talk) 06:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Future Combat Sytems.jpg
When tagged, there was no supporting evidence (based on the source given) to suggest it was as claimed.

I note that subssquently an additional source was givwen to confirm the license shown, Thanks for removing the tag, before I did :)

Subject to a qucik confrimation it was on a US Gov site, I'll flag it for commons transfer :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD comments
Thanks for the note. That was actually an editing mistake. -- IP69.226.103.13 |  Talk about me.  21:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Prod on Krishna Kumar
This should have been left for Rockpocket. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 06:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Krishna Kumar
An article that you have been involved in editing, Krishna Kumar, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Rockpock e  t  09:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Article for deletion
Thanks for your support on Northeast Kingdom Community Action. I think I have brought the article up to more than standard for retention. Doing so went well beyond my interest with it, but oh, well. In for a penny, in for a pound.

My problem is with User:Weaponbb7. Not sure why he targeted it in the first place. I admit that it wasn't obviously the biggest piece of government in Vermont, but it does serve three counties. And why are government agencies being targeted anyway? The last seems wrong IMO. Do you know of a standard someplace on government departments/agencies? Student7 (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

منطقة عجمان الحرة
Hello Eastmain, thanks for your message. I'm happy to userfy this article if that would be helpful. May I userfy it to your userspace or would somewhere else be better? Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have placed it at User:Eastmain/منطقة عجمان الحرة. Kind regards, --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:Millennium Plus
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 05:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletion
Ah, thanks for getting around to what I thought would be a good idea to create, but I was too lazy to do so. At least somebody helps save dead-end redirects out there. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Nice save
Eastmain, good work here. Cheers, 99.12.243.20 (talk) 17:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Malmo Anadolu BI Logo 2008.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Malmo Anadolu BI Logo 2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MassiveGoodLogo200px.png
 Thanks for uploading File:MassiveGoodLogo200px.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

AFDs
Could you point me in the direction of where licensed radio stations are automatically notable has been established by consensus? I have never heard this, but there is lots on Wikipedia that I have not seen... RP459 (talk) 20:17, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:BROADCAST says that radio stations may be notable but there is no presumption of notability. RP459 (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Please see Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes - Eastmain (talk) 20:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I replied at Articles for deletion/Soundart Radio RP459 (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Oh
I see your AFD comments. If a small number of people agree, I will drop the AFD early. Or you can ask an objective administrator (not your friends) and have them write to me and I'll agree on speedy closure and keep. JB50000 (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD: Journal of the Norwegian Medical Association
Upon reading the improved version; yes the article should be kept. The reason I didn't update the article myself was that I can't find the equivalent information in English. But can I remove the AfD tag myself, even if I'm not an admin? Nahrizuladib (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
{{talkback|Wifione|You nominated some redirects at AfD.|ts=04:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)}

Re: Qatar University Library
Thanks for the notification. I'm not sure if it actually meets the general notability guideline, perhaps a merger would be a better option. - Reconsider !  09:43, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank very much for solving several major time consuming and extremely frustrating problems for me as I tried to add content to the WIllS EYE INSTITUTE entry. In all sincerity, I can't thank you enough. Now, that the site has been established and the basic infrastructure set, I can take my time and read through all the guides and apply more content over time.

I don't know how to add one of those iconic symbols of praise, but I'd appreciate you adding one to this post to commend your work on my behalf!

roger barone12:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Photosfromphilly (talk • contribs)

SIncerely, appreciate your assistance with several problems regarding WIlls Eye Institute
Thank very much for solving several major time consuming and extremely frustrating problems for me as I tried to add content to the WIllS EYE INSTITUTE entry. In all sincerity, I can't thank you enough. Now, that the site has been established and the basic infrastructure set, I can take my time and read through all the guides and apply more content over time.

I don't know how to add one of those iconic symbols of praise, but I'd appreciate you adding one to this post to commend your work on my behalf!

roger barone12:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Photosfromphilly (talk • contribs)

Re: speedy Deletion
Sorry i skimmed it looking for the Speedy for Non english thanks for catching it. Weaponbb7 (talk) 00:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Eastmain! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Ferhat Odabaşı -
 * 2) Paulo Pereira de Almeida -
 * 3) Jessica Chaffin -

Deletions
A bit late, but thanks for supporting the decision to not delete Agnes of Anhalt-Dessau. I liked what you said, in particular: ''Many articles on people like Agnes of Anhalt-Dessau start out as if they were copied from a genealogy book. This fact shouldn't distract us from the possibility that notability by Wikipedia standards can be established, and should probably discourage us from tagging such an article for deletion without a careful search.''

Some administrators are ever eager to delete new articles, especially when they're related to persons they may have some biases against (i.e. royalty and nobility). While I'll agree that there are some such articles that warrant deletion, the vast majority just need some further research to be proved notable, especially when those in their position most likely have accomplished things worth documenting. So, again, thanks for your actions preventing deletions when possible. Ruby2010 (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Re: Contested Speedy Delete of Newfoundland Island
I concur with the deprod of Ukasiksalik Island; I was thinking of removing it myself if no one else got to it first. But I still think that the Newfoundland Island disambiguation page is redundant; both options on it are already listed on the Newfoundland disambiguation page. I think you are probably right that it should not be deleted; I'm going to redirect it back to the Newfoundland page - that way anyone looking for Ukasiksalik under the alternate name will be able to find what they are looking for. (This all got started because a bot went through about two months ago and relinked a whole list of articles from Newfoundland (island) to Newfoundland Island, all of them incorrectly.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 02:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't object to changing it to a redirect. Go ahead. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

New proposal
Hi Eastmain, here you'll find a new proposal I've suggested. Drop in and give your views, whenever you have time.  ▒ Wirεłεşş ▒ Fidεłitұ ▒ Ćłâşş ▒ Θnε ▒  ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex"> ♣Łεâvε Ξ мεşşâgε♣ 04:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

comments on my talk page
Please stop posting on my page about active AfDs, it is approaching canvassing. LibStar (talk) 22:59, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * As you wish. The purpose of my message was to give you an opportunity to withdraw your AfD in light of the improvements to the article. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * it would be safe to assume that all nominators watchover their AfDs. LibStar (talk) 03:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Along the same lines, I had a look at the Andre Staffelbach article and the sources you added, and switched over to Keep at the AFD. However, leaving me a message asking me to reconsider my comments mere minutes after I posted them is a bit hinky. It does edge a bit toward Canvassing, especially if you do not message all participants. Since the AFD is all of three hours old, it's a safe bet that the nominator and commentors will monitor its progress as the 7 days pass. If, despite additional sources, no one has reconsidered, a note at the AFD may be appropriate ("I added a bunch of sources, could the editors who commented before that please re-evaluate? kthx"). No problem, but you'll want to be more careful in the future - deletion debates can be touchy even before procedural and policy shenanigans are added in. Thanks, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 20:26, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Academy of Learned Societies in the Social Sciences
Hello Eastmain, you created the aforementioned article some 1½ years ago. Yet there's the much older article Academy of Learned Societies for the Social Sciences, too. Because of the similar names and because both articles link to the same website, I assume that it's actually the same academy. It seems to me that the older article's name is the correct one, though, and there's a lot more articles that link to it. So I'd propose to merge your article into the older one. Best regards, --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 17:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, please merge them, and leave a redirect at Academy of Learned Societies in the Social Sciences. The reference in this article by David Blunkett appears to be incorrect.  Companies House confirms that the current name is Academy of Social Sciences and the old name is THE ACADEMY OF LEARNED SOCIETIES FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES. http://wck2.companieshouse.gov.uk/98b038f9c77f977ec30545392a0f3a2a/compdetails  The name change was effective  5 July 2007. - Eastmain (talk • contribs)  18:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * All right then! I've never merged two articles, but considering the length of the articles, it doesn't appear to be too difficult a task. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 11:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Reflinks
Very often the problems are intermittent, or the author fixes them, or WP fixes them. Thank you for letting me know, I just try again the next time I visit the page... usually it works eventually. I just want the author to have a chance to fix it. While I haven't authored software for the public in years, my personal pet peeve in writing for the public was hearing a complaint about my software being made to someone else... when no one had told me it was a problem. :) Thanks again, and all the best. -  Sinneed  22:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Lake Mower reflinks
Thanks for fixing those reflinks on the Lake Mower article; I appreciate it! Invmog (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:AfC
Hi, I noticed you were resubmitting some AfCs after adding more sources and doing some work on them. Could you please keep the old templates on the submissions as well though, if for nothing other than just for the record. Thanks,  fetch  comms  ☛ 23:48, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Certainly. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:29, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Lagrange Mall
I don't think there's any potential for an article on Hull Storey Gibson; the only source I could find that was specifically about the company was this. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
-- &#47; MWOAP &#124; Notify Me &#92; 23:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

ABOUT RANDON II
Please eastmain ,can you help me concerning my article about Randon II,it was very hard and very long to write. Please don't delete it ,halp me i want to keep the article .sincerely. from prince elvis mozart. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prince elvis mozart (talk • contribs) 05:20, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

RE:Chapman Waste Disposal
Hello, I restored the older revisions of the article as you requested. The article is currently still in the same state it was in before, but you can now look back through the history and see the edits made previously to the article to get those references back or any other information you want to retrieve. Thanks! --  At am a  頭 17:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * After having said that, I looked back through the history and the only edit you've made to the article was this one which contested a speedy deletion and expanded the article slightly, but didn't add any references. Just thought I'd add that, thanks. --  At am a  頭 18:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Arthur Shelton
Hello, Eastmain. I just got your message about this article, but although I added a hatnote to it, I haven'tr reallyedited it and didn't create it. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 00:28, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. Another editor had mentioned your name in the AfD, which is why I thought you might be interested. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:34, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Kyarumba islamic centre secondary school
A7? I thought I tagged it as G11.  fetch  comms  ☛ 01:52, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy
Thanks for turning Committee Encouraging Corporate Philanthropy around and making it a proper article. Good job! X X X antiuser eh? 08:58, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EdGilmour (talk • contribs) 11:51, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:02, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Frank Whittaker
Thanks for your contribution to Frank Whittaker. I wish you could also see Scott L. Harris. Thank you.--Pradeep (talk) 19:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Acknowledging your input to Scott L. Harris.--117.195.196.177 (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Gurch
This edit appears to be partially wrong. It seems you added a warning from another user to this user's page by accident? --MZMcBride (talk) 02:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have no idea how I did that. I have struck out the warning, though. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

warning
Er... you warn me for "conflict of interest" on an article I've never edited about a guy I've never heard of, then strike out your warning and sign someone else's name on it? Is there a reason for this? Gurch (talk) 05:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
 Neonblak <sup style="color:darkblue;">talk  -  05:53, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Olsson
Yes I do see sources which is why I decided it is not speediable. But I really do think those sources are just because one of their soldiers happened to die in action. I really do not think this is a notable soldier. We cannot have articles for every soldier who died in action. What next. Biographies of every trench soldier who died in World War I? This is no different... ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 19:36, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The reason I ask is because if you think about it, is it likely that any sources would have covered this young soldier if he hadn't have been killed in action. A non-notable biography. I appreciate your translation efforts but if you cut down all the "condolences" and that "he was well liked" what are you left with? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 20:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Claes Joachim Olsson
I have nominated Claes Joachim Olsson, an article that you created or expanded, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Claes Joachim Olsson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 20:28, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Political candidates
Hi there. I noticed you participated in the Articles for Deletion discussion for Graham Jones (politician). I have started a discussion regarding a consensus position for candidates in legislative elections (by way of amending WP:POLITICIAN, in case you are interested in putting forward your views there. --Mkativerata (talk) 01:55, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Roland Massaquoi
Great job! Bearian (talk) 03:33, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
-- Written by  General  Cheese  03:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Re. Dionny baez
Hey, good job turning it into a proper sourced stub! I agree with you that it seems to meet WP:BARE and should be kept. Keep up the good work! X X X antiuser eh? 07:41, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note. I couldn't have done it without Google Translate. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 07:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:India articles missing geocoordinate data
-- The Anome (talk) 15:49, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token d4d2ff151359de7616c7192c9afe2779
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Articles for deletion nomination of Ferhat Odabaşı
I have nominated Ferhat Odabaşı, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Ferhat Odabaşı. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Alan -  talk  00:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Good job
Nice work with the referencing improvements relating to Articles for deletion/Christopher Edwards (2nd nomination). Cheers, Cirt (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Assertion of notability
Please help You posted on my talk that By-Sexual makes "a credible assertion of importance or significance," but I don't see one. There is no reference to them being famous, important, or groundbreaking in any manner as far as I can see. Please respond on my talk. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Question
Obviously I used the wrong approach on the article on Charles F. B. Price and assumed that it was a copyright violation since it was a verbatim copy of the material on the link. I was also basing it on WP:NOFULLTEXT - how should I address this in the future? Thanks, (GregJackP (talk) 15:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC))

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Reeves
Hi there, you may be interested in commenting on this discussion. Thanks--TM 00:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Tagging of articles
I will tag obvious ads for deletion when I feel it appropriate.--Grahame (talk) 07:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Image restore File:Valhalla-Logo.jpg
The image should now be restored and in visible from the article. Eluchil404 (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
noisy  jinx  huh? 03:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

G. K. Podila
I added G. K. Podila to the List of Telugu people. He was a biologist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville who was murdered. You might want to look at the article about him, and perhaps add an article about him to the Telugu Wikipedia. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message. I will look at it. --Kajasudhakarababu (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Los Marziano
Hi,

I noticed that you're starting translation on Los Marziano. While I appreciate it, I was just wondering if you could first indicate if he's even notable to this wiki. Because if he's not, I'd hate for you to translate the whole thing and have it speedied. -Zeus-u 22:35, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If Variety magazine is writing about the movie, it is probably notable. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
iBen 01:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

RE: Prod Contest
How are subway stations considered always noteable? Anyway, if you can provide a direct link to where WP policy says that I will back down and appologise for the inconvenience, otherwise, I maintain that the page should be deleted. Mod mmg (talk) 07:16, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Please reply on my talk page not here.

RE: Votorantim Siderurgia
Then this belongs on the brazillian language version on Wikipedia. Mod mmg (talk) 07:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply on my talkpage.

RE: Boginja
Neither the album or the singer are noteable, and even if the singer is then this should be on the singers page and not separate. Mod mmg (talk) 07:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply on my talkpage.

RE: PROD of Multimedia and Sensors Laboratory at Georgia Institute of Technology
This is not a school.Mod mmg (talk) 07:23, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply on my talkpage.

Its a duplicate article....
See Articles for deletion/Tere Bina Jiya Nahin Jaye. This is just a changed name for a film with an existing article. Indian film does that more often than not.... as well as having multiple films over multipe years in different languages all having the same names. Tere Bina Jiya Nahin Jaye is just Hhey Gujju, but with a new name as production proceeds.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:20, 22 February 2010 (UTC)


 * In the interim, I have edited the HHey Gujju article to show its name change and a change in director. Moving the modified older article over the newer Tere Bina Jiya Nahin Jaye would be the solution.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

United Kingdom nursing journals
Given that scientific journals nowadays are hardly ever really associated with one country (even if they are called "American Journal of...", "British Journal of...", etc.) it does not seem very useful to keep categorizing them according to country. Following this discussion I have re-categorized journals that had a country-specific category. I see that you reverted this for 2 nursing journals and would like to ask you to reconsider this. Thanks. --Crusio (talk) 16:06, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right. I have undone my reverts. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! --Crusio (talk) 08:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Kurt Krakowian
Good to see an experienced editor has taken an interest in this. I'm at work, and limited for time. I'm having trouble finding significant media coverage, and I don't see anything that supports the BLP stuff. A lot of stuff is behind pay walls, but dos not feel helpful from what I can see. The more I see, the less I'm convinced of notability. I am writing an AFD for this, but will hold off if you thnk this can be saved. Cheers, and happy editing. Dloh cierekim  03:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O RLY? (4th nomination)
I think you should look at Fuchs' analysis of the sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 02:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Concerning the Speedy deletion of Higashi-Iwatsuki Station
Thanks for correcting me! I think I should do my homework and read more guidlines before doing stupid stuff like that again! --Dyaa (talk) 19:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
avs5221 (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Kottankulangara Festival
Hi Eastmain, I have noticed that you have removed the speedy tag from Kottankulangara Festival. Actually, this article is a copy-paste from hubpages.com/hub/Chamayavilakku-Photos which seems to be an unreliable source. I could not use the speedy tag for copyvio as the site is black listed. This is for your kind information. Salih ( talk ) 16:17, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Salih  ( talk ) 18:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Your edits
"and the creator isn't the only person who has worked on the article". The diff1 diff2 from creation to present proves you otherwise. -Atmoz (talk) 19:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Categories aren't substantial content. -Atmoz (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * It looks like the ANI thread is going to turn into a discussion of CSD#A7, and to the underlying delete/don't delete issue, so to answer your original question about "what should be done": IMHO (and this may not square with current policy as-written) the best response to rudeness from someone who is obviously upset about something is to disengage. If this is a chronic problem, that would be one thing, but I don't think it is. If someone posted the above message on my talk page, I'd just delete it and move on with my life. WP:WQA exists, but I don't think it's worth your time, to be honest. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:18, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. You are probably right. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:33, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SwanseaSound165x50.png
 Thanks for uploading File:SwanseaSound165x50.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Husqvarna FF Logo 2008.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Husqvarna FF Logo 2008.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Wedemeyer
I commend you for helping fix articles that face deletion, but I would like to point out that the speedy delete tag on the Wedemeyer page is due to the fact that he is a nobody. I am not against him. Give him time if you think he has potential to be a great guy and let him carve a name for himself before he merits a Wikipedia page. Otherwise, this will become a directory of every person employed somewhere or the other. Please do not remove the tag and I would appreciate it if you can discuss the issue here on your page as I am not logged in and probably get assigned a different IP address each time I get on the internet (I prefer not to be logged in when I place deletion tags simply to avoid bad blood - there is no bad intent on my part). Again, I commend you for fixing articles and trying to save them instead of deleting them, but this one really seems like a vanity article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.53.137.5 (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion: Brett King Help requested
Eastmain - I'm having a debate over this with talk over his stance on this article. He's citing a previous deletion as to why this article created over a year later should be deleted? In the meantime, the subject of the article has got some major press and has published a ground breaking book on banking. I think that warrants allowing this to play out rather than simply a deletion because the original deletion decision stood. He's citing conflict of interest and other stuff that is just not applicable here. Any suggestions? Can you weigh in on the discussion page? Sorry - I'm rather upset by his approach here... —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterHoflich (talk • contribs) 12:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Deletion discussion: Brett King Help requested
Eastmain - I'm having a debate over this with User:GregJackP over his stance on this article. He's citing a previous deletion as to why this article created over a year later should be deleted? In the meantime, the subject of the article has got some major press and has published a ground breaking book on banking. I think that warrants allowing this to play out rather than simply a deletion because the original deletion decision stood. He's citing conflict of interest and other stuff that is just not applicable here. Any suggestions? Can you weigh in on the discussion page? Sorry - I'm rather upset by his approach here... PeterHoflich (talk) 12:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy tags
Re South Carolina Public Charter School District, you removed the db-prod tag without comment so I assumed you had just ignored it. Yes an admin came along later and refused the deletion but that did not happen until after I had restored the tag. Still doesn't seem notable and will probably an unread stub forever. --Chuunen Baka (talk) 14:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Keith R. Briffa article deletion
Hello! The Climate Realist blog (http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=5395) is reporting that Wikipedia pulled the Keith Briffa bio page because it's in on the conspiracy... etc. etc. I don't pay much attention to the deletionist debates, but isn't it clear that Briffa is notable just because there's this level of suspicion about him? Anyhow, since you seem to have saved up the page, why not restore it? Good luck! Jeangoodwin (talk) 17:39, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Roseville
A map (which is all the Atlas of Canada link really was) doesn't, in and of itself, count as a principal source — as it proves absolutely nothing except the place's physical location, it can be a supplementary source after notability has already been established by other sources, but it can't demonstrate notability all by itself. And a walking tour page on a community website doesn't satisfy the requirement for independent sources. Bearcat (talk) 06:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That's fine, as long as the article actually has real sources besides just a map and the local gardening committee. Far too often I see people insist that a badly written and unsourced article is perfectly acceptable on the grounds that the topic is "inherently notable" — but as long as Wikipedia's goal is to be an encyclopedia rather than a random graffiti wall, we really do have to insist on quality sources. Any named community is certainly valid as a potential article topic, but the resulting article still has to meet encyclopedic standards. Bearcat (talk) 06:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Good Music 107.5FM
A tag has been placed on Good Music 107.5FM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. → James Kidd ( contr / talk / email ) 16:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Radio stations are generally notable. See Notability_(media) Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:26, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Yes, WP:BCAST would seem to require one of the following to establish notability for a radio station "..large audience, established broadcast history, or unique programming." I don't see any claim to notability currently.  --→ James Kidd  ( contr / talk / email ) 17:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * See also  Articles for deletion/Common outcomes   Eastmain (talk • contribs)  18:05, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:BROADCAST says that radio stations may be notable but there is no presumption of notability. "Just because" isn't a reason.  --→ James Kidd  ( contr / talk / email ) 22:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lotte Hotel Moscow
I've added a proposed deletion tag to the article because I don't believe that the references establish notability, they look to be Russian language press releases (and some of the refs are copies of each other at different sites). Just an FYI. --  At am a  頭 22:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Ol Yeller Talktome 05:28, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

kfantransmittertour.co.cc and KFAN (AM)
Eastmain,

Back in December there was a request to whitelist kfantransmittertour.co.cc. You very helpfully indicated it was to be whitelisted. Today I attempted to re-link the two kfantransmittertour pages related to the request but wiki still has them blacklisted. Can you help? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.166.195 (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The site http://kfantransmittertour.co.cc/ has been whitelisted, and the links have been added to KFAN (AM) Eastmain (talk • contribs)  03:39, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Eastmain, thanks for your help with this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.57.236 (talk) 01:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Positioning Animals Worldwide Article
Thank you for updating our article "Positioning Animals Worldwide". These edits really helped saving this page from deletion.

Just to let you know, that we want to make following addition into this article - 1. Paw Inc Logo 2. Reference link for SpotLight I-phone Application 3. Spotlightgps.com which is a Product website of PAW under External links

Please suggest can we go ahead and make these changes or do you think it will again come under radar of speedy deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Navdeeptrivedi (talk • contribs) 15:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Thanks Eastmain
 * I suggest that you only add references from third-party reliable sources such as newspapers and magazines. If the iPhone application has been reviewed or mentioned in a reliable source, then Wikipedia editors would accept that as evidence of notability. A reliable source does not have to be available online, but should include the date of publication and the page number. I would only add the company's logo if you are making other changes at the same time. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

To add spotlight iPhone application to the article can we use (http://blogs.newsobserver.com/business/find-fido-with-your-iphone) as reference link. Also it would be great if you can add PAW Inc logo(http://www.spotlightgps.com/Images/logo_paw.png) to the article.

Hello Eastmain,

I wanted to let you know that the company name for Positioning Animals Worldwide has been changed to Securus  Inc. (www.securusgps.com).Can you  please suggest what do we need to do to create the new article page of Securus  Inc.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Navdeeptrivedi (talk • contribs) 16:17, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Fulton–Taylor House, Fulton-Taylor House
Re: your request at my talk page: Oops and apologies. I certainly meant to create that stub and not leave that redirect hanging out there. I guess I forgot what I was doing partway through. I've added a few references and made some formatting changes, but your stub certainly covered most of what I would put in a stub. Thanks! &mdash;Ipoellet (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Fulton-Taylor House
Please do not leave condescending templates on my talk page. I am familiar with the speedy deletion criteria and do not need to reminded of it. I tagged Fulton-Taylor House for deletion on 18:41, 4 April 2010 because it was a redirect to a red link. You created Fulton–Taylor House on 23:21, 4 April 2010, more than three hours after I placed the speedy tag. Thus my tag was correct until you rectified the issue by creating the page. Cunard (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've added an example to my response at User talk:Cunard. I'm sorry that I was unnecessarily brusque with my comment to you above. You do impressive work here which I greatly admire and respect. Cunard (talk) 06:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Cocadas and Cocadas
Why the hell does it matter if it is in english or spanish! If you want you can find it in English. It is if Mexican culture, which only is based off it. Plus I know the recipe too...Ignorant person! Mm0502 (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)Mm0502Mm0502 (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This is what I wrote in the AfD: *Keep. This Google News search, filtered to show only English hits, shows many English-language hits in reliable sources. (Not that there is anything wrong with Spanish-language sources, but English-language ones are easier to work with.) Eastmain (talk • contribs)  20:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

RE: Your Speedy Deletion Contestion of Jatheon Technologies
Before I drop this issue as I stated I would on the article's talk page, I'd like to ask you about your motivations for keeping the article. It's obvious you like to keep everything on Wikipedia by what you state on your userpage, but the one-sentence explanation you wrote into the template-reply isn't quite enough to satisfy me.

You were aware that it has been shown that the primary contributor is directly affiliated with the company, correct? By your decision, am I now free to write a positive-sounding, promotional article about the company I work at, if I back it up with questionable sources that rehash press-relases? And when it's listed for deletion, can I then simply say hey, wait, I'll remove the spam and just shuffle some text around? Because if so, I'd like to get started right away, so that the company I work at may leverage the Google ranking of Wikipedia for its benefit.

You may keep any sarcasm you found, but I'm still curious as to whether you considered the identity of the primary contributor and the resulting conflict of interest. --Zabadab (Talk) @ 11:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * A conflict of interest is a problem to be recognized, but it is not in itself a reason to delete the article. If the company is notable, the article should be kept. If material in the article is inconsistent with a neutral point of view, the article should be fixed accordingly. But the fact that an article was created by someone with a conflict of interest is a warning, not an absolute disqualification. It might have been better if the contributor had submitted the page at WikiProject Articles for creation
 * As for the company you work for, is it notable? Can you write the article in a way that is fair and NPOV?
 * Sarcasm is best avoided at Wikipedia, as it is likely to be misunderstood. In general, placing a speedy tag on an article that has just survived an AfD is unlikely to get the result you wish. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 13:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

otheruese4
Please do not use otheruses4. It redirects to about.174.3.123.220 (talk) 06:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Lakeland Christian Academy (Winona Lake, Indiana)
Where does CSD says a7 doesn't apply to schools? Besides, this is more like an ad for a company, anyway. But I've listed it to AfD. Woogee (talk) 03:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Talk page stalker here. First line under the header at WP:CSD: "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization  (e.g. band, club, company, etc., except schools), or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant."  Emphasis is mine. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Whoops. I missed that.  I had thought of putting a db-ad tag on it.  :)  Woogee (talk) 04:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

SanTan Brewery
The references you added didn't really rise to the level required by WP:CORP: "On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability." Daniel Case (talk) 13:53, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Siperia
Yes, that's a good point. I have copied the reliable (newspaper) source to the fi-wiki article. --hydrox (talk) 15:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Novotel Nathan Road Kowloon Hong Kong
A tag has been placed on Novotel Nathan Road Kowloon Hong Kong, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Szzuk (talk) 21:49, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Novotel Nathan Road Kowloon Hong Kong
I have nominated Novotel Nathan Road Kowloon Hong Kong, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Novotel Nathan Road Kowloon Hong Kong. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Szzuk (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

AFD: Kawartha Lakes municipal election, 2010
Hi, I noticed you supported some of my other municipal election articles when they came up for AfD. Here is another one: Articles for deletion/Kawartha Lakes municipal election, 2010. -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Colorado Dimensional Signs
Thank you for your support.

The two main objections seem to be self promotion and notability.

It seems the keep / delete system is only for moderators.

However I point to the Wikideia Guidelines that others seem not to understand:

Notability requires verifiable evidence

The common theme in the notability guidelines is that there must be verifiable objective evidence that the subject has received significant attention by the world at large to support a claim of notability.

The evidence must show the topic has gained significant independent coverage or recognition, and that this was not a mere "flash in the pan", nor a result of promotional activity or indiscriminate publicity, nor is the topic unsuitable for any other reason. Sources of evidence include recognized peer reviewed publications, credible and authoritative books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources generally.

Self-promotion and indiscriminate publicity

Publication in a reliable source is not always good evidence of notability:

Wikipedia is not a promotional medium. Self-promotion, paid material, autobiography, and product placement are not valid routes to an encyclopedia article. The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it – without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter.

Neutral sources are also needed to guarantee a neutral article can be written —self-published sources cannot be assumed neutral; see Wikipedia:Autobiography and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest for discussion of neutrality concerns of such sources. Even non-promotional self-published sources, like technical manuals that accompany a product, are still not evidence of notability as they do not measure the attention a subject has received by the world at large.

I have been over this time and time and as far as can be seen, meet all qualifying points.

Please rally support, or pass on to a higher order...

Mimaki (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Saint-Martin, Laval, Quebec
Re Saint-Martin, Laval, Quebec, please read Chomedey, Quebec. Ville de Saint-Martin once was a city in its own right. The extends that you give may, or may not, reflect the extend of the former city. I doubt that the Saint Martin Station was located within the city limits. The name "Saint-Martin" is not in current usage as the name of any neighbourhood in Laval, Quebec. Your article needs to reflect the fact that this is a former city and research is needed to establish what were the former city limits. Peter Horn User talk 00:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Agyenim Boateng
Dear Eastman,

Thank you so much for rescuing my first article from deletion. I appreciate your contribution. I am trying to upload a photograph on the page. I saved it in the wikimedia page under agyemin boateng image.png Please let me know how I can download it to the wikipedia page

Thanks again.

Legaleagle101 (talk) 18:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Legaleagle101 (talk • contribs) 18:30, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I added an infobox with the photograph to the article. If you can fill in any of the blanks in the infobox, please do so. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:41, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Agyenim Boateng Photo
Hi Eastman,

I noted that the photograph has been deleted from the wikipedia page. I do not know why. Please let me know why it has been deleted and how I can upload the photograph of agyenim boateng Thanks for all the assistance provided on my first article

Legaleagle101 (talk) 21:11, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Some text was inadvertently added to the link to the photo. I fixed the page, and the image displays properly now. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for saving the entry I started on the New Evangelical Partnership for the Common Good (NEP). Keep up the great work!

01:32, 26 April 2010 Bluesouljah (talk)

Article about today's descendants of Ottoman Dynasty is not finished, please remove warnings and allow us continue to work on it. Photographs were published with authorization of the owner and email has been sent to wikipedia. Please remove warning for photograph. Thank you.

-- The Royal House of Osman (talk) 22:39, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Notability of government officials
Hi You pointed out that being a former president or PM for the same state is a proof of being 'notable'. So going by your logic then all the former Presidents, Prime ministers, Members of Legislatures must be 'notable personalities'? So, should we add ALL those formers to the list of notable personality section??

Hunnyhiteshseth (talk) 15:47, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Hunnyhiteshseth 28 April 9:20PM
 * Yes, that would be correct. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:09, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Harsh Snehanshu
Hello Eastmain, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Harsh Snehanshu has been removed. It was removed by Bwilkins with the following edit summary ' (decline prod - although I'm not 100% convinced, the top-10 appears valid. AfD if desired) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with Bwilkins before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

John Moultrie copyvioed article
Here's the two links that the article was copied from. It was pretty much a straight copyvio, so there isn't anything worth restoring; there's nothing to stub, and since even the title isn't worth saving, just start a new article. Feel free to recreate the article as a non-copyvio version, with an appropriate title, using the sources that were copied. This looks like the two sources that were used: and. Good luck! -- Jayron  32  01:03, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Legaleagle's copyright problems
Just for your information: I answered on my de.wiki talk page. It's very nice to work togehter internationally. Cheers --Saibo ( Δ ) 23:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Image of Agyenim Boateng
The image of agyenim boateng has disappeared from the wiki page. I have uploaded another image (agyenim2.jpg on the wikimedia commmons) What description do I need to put on the page regarding the license? Thanks

Legaleagle101 (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
 * it depends on if you have permision to upload it or not (under a creative commons licence), but if you made it, you can choose what licence you release it under. You can not "donate" it to wikipedia as it is not allowed. More information can be found on Commons or in the commons freenode channel Soph  ie  21:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

The West End School
You wrote that speedy deletion criterion A7 does not apply to schools. I knew that, and I would like to point out that the criterion I tagged the article under was not A7. It was G11. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 19:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I see you made the same mistake (declining a G11 as an invalid A7) with Sta. Elena High School, though the latter is salvageable. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 19:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

I have restored the tag to the The West End School as I think is appropriate where a CSD tag is removed in a clear case of error. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * In my view, it is better to salvage an article about a notable school or other subject with style issues than to delete it. In this case, I don't think G11 applied. I edited the article and I think it's better now. The references appear strong enough to show notability, even though it is only a middle school. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:30, 11 May 2010 (UTC)