User talk:Easwarno1/Archive2

RE: Citing websites
Yeah, I am familiar with that citing format. I never really use it though; I've used the format for several year now. I've got no reason to have a problem with the format described in Template:Cite web, either. I noticed that the Weather Systems page had two references, using the cite web format, with extra periods; I removed those. Thanks for your inquiry. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 23:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
 * PS: about originally posting on my user page: don't worry, it's all cool. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 23:16, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Papanasini Siva Temple
Hi. Thanks for joining the GOCE drive. I hope you will enjoy it. I agree with your assessment of Papanasini Siva Temple and your decision to mark it as GOCEreviewed. Just a couple of pointers for you:
 * To link to a template like GOCEreviewed, you need either to write the word template in the wikilink, like Template:GOCEreviewed or to use the tl (template link) template, as GOCEreviewed.
 * GOCEreviewed goes on the article's talk page, not on the article page, and when you put it there you should remove any "copy edit" tag from the article.
 * You shouldn't put "|category=no" in a GOCEreviewed that you place on an article talk page.
 * incoherent doesn't work inside Multiple issues, so we have to place it separately. It means the article lacks a single topic, not that the writing is incoherent.

I hope these will help, and again, that you'll enjoy the drive. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 20:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the tips. Although, I left the copyedit tag on because WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/How to says,

There are occasions when you will encounter an article in the backlog that is unfit for a major copy edit due to other issues. In those cases, it is recommended that you place the GOCEreviewed tag at the top of the article's talk page. The purpose is two-fold: To inform other GOCE members immediately that an editor has already reviewed the article, possibly even attempted to start the copy edit, and determined that a major copy edit could not be sufficiently completed at that time. To inform other Wikipedia users that the article tagged with copy edit has not been neglected; rather, it will be addressed after other clean-up measures have been taken. The tag copy edit should not be removed from the article in this case. This is not to be used as an attempt to deny copy edits. You should watch the article and make your copy editing contributions when you feel other clean-up measures have been sufficiently performed.
 * There seems to be a contradiction in your tip and the how-to. Please clarify the same? Easwarno1 (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * So there is, and I hadn't been aware of it. I'll take it up on the talk pages. Thanks very much for spotting it! --Stfg (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Now raised at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. Thanks again. --Stfg (talk) 20:30, 3 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Now dealt with. Again, thank you for catching this. --Stfg (talk) 21:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Easwarno1 (talk) 20:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Kapil Dev
Hi there. I see you marked the GOCE request for that article as "working" on 8th May, so this is just to warn you that another copy editor did some work on it on 10 May without registering it there and has told the requester that it's done. I've asked User:Baffle gab1978 to do whatever is necessary to avoid you being tripped up.

We do ask people not to book more than one article from the requests page at one time, and only to do it when they intend to start. This is because other copy editors might be interested in those articles and ready to go, so booking an article and not doing it may delay its progression. Perhaps the best thing to save you wasting time would be to drop the Kapil Dev hauls now. Do you plan to start 2011 CWC soon? Rgds, --Stfg (talk) 22:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm Baffle gab1978; I copy-edited this article after i was asked to and declined because i don't generally take direct requests but this one was short so I took it. It's probable that you'll see problems I didn't and I don't have a problem with that - and I only worked on the prose at the top. I'm sorry if I caused any problems - didn't want to waste your time. Regards, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I took a look at the Kapil Dev 5-fors this morning and I think Baffle gab1978 did all that was needed for the article, so I've archived the request now. --Stfg (talk) 11:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Baffle gab1978, no worries. I got tripped up with real-life issues...it seems Stfg approves of your work. Stfg, I will be tied up IRL a bit more, I've removed CWC 2011 from my list, and will also annotate the request accordingly. Easwarno1 (talk) 23:55, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. And thanks for the work you've been doing. --Stfg (talk) 10:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul Otellini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Economic Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fixed deposit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 18 January 2013 (UTC)