User talk:Eatcha/Archive 1

Reopened Discussion
A discussion you participated in has been reopened, you may wish to opine.  LΞVIXIUS  &#128172; 08:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Italian software engineers


A tag has been placed on Category:Italian software engineers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Doubtnut for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doubtnut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Doubtnut until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DJRSD (talk) 07:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Unblock
Pinging the blocking admin here:. SQL Query me! 06:02, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I saw that this was indeed a self-requested block and so just went ahead and unblocked. There was no abuse that lead to the block, so I think it's reasonable in this case. Eatcha, it sounds like you requested the block to help with time management. As someone who struggles myself with time management, please be careful. A couple of months back, you thought you needed to stay away for a year. Now you think things are different. Great, if they are, but be careful. Wikipedia shouldn't be a source of stress to you. :) Anyway, and I want to be clear, the block was self-requested and not as a result of any bad behaviour. --Yamla (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

ANI notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:54, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Eatcha

Thank you for creating Killing of Babu Lal Vaishnav.

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 21:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
HI , I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users. Thanks and see you around online, María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC) If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 14:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hi Eatcha! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Vishwa Hindu Parishad that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 19:34, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Greetings!
Hey buddy, I hope ya doing good. Well I was not active on Wikipedia for almost 2 years now, I opened it today and saw your proposal of deletions on all my created pages. Pretty amazed was my reaction. Most of which met notability but maybe a rewriting would have helped much. Frankly speaking, Idk why was that you did it but I hope you can be more helpful in letting a great work go on Wikipedia rather than having any strange grudges or whatever. Contributing is what we shall do maybe as a user; helping in sorting out problems rather than creating for each other and as well as reader too adding to popularity of our community platform. (Manupriy Ahluwalia (talk))

Happy New Year!


Empire AS  Talk ! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be . Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive . This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS  Talk ! 18:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * @ User:Empire AS Thanks you. I wish, you too have a happy and prosperous 2021. -- Eatcha 13:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks. :) Empire AS   Talk ! 13:46, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: WhiteHat Jr (February 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WhiteHat Jr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WhiteHat Jr, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WhiteHat_Jr Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WhiteHat_Jr reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 16:27, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Deletion page of Jeevan Kumar (actor)
Hi Eatcha I have created Jeevan Kumar (actor) who acts in the Telugu Tollywood film industry, but after few days the page is now showing deletion. can you please check and remove the deletion. I can provide any info about him.

--Poojasrireddy (talk) 05:21, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at Park Jin Hyok
Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Park Jin Hyok. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you. -- Eatcha 09:06, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Uttar Pradesh Police
Hello, I was going through some of your other contributions and I saw your additions on the page of Uttar Pradesh Police regarding "Misconduct and corruption". I would highly recommend going through WP:BLPCRIME over anything else. Note there are other issues with your addition, to summarise while there is nothing wrong with such a section, it shouldn't be a list of incidents especially due to the sensitive nature of the content but rather should be a overview of the topic preferable from scholarly sources, there should be ample academic discourse available on this particular topic. On a more general note, please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies, the essay on communication may also be helpful for you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 15:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I only care about trashing the police and exposing their brutality on the underprivileged. Anybody can expand, copy-edit my additions. I created that section and I believe they(UP Police) deserve to be trashed on Wikipedia. -- Eatcha 15:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement
See WP:AE. Tayi Arajakate Talk 02:14, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

About Uttar Pradesh police
You added an article about "Yadavisation" of UP police. I would like to know the sources from which you got this information. First of all, all the sources you cited were just speculations and there was no hard data. Secondly, the government does not collect data on castes so you don't know the number of Yadavs in Uttar Pradesh or India so I would like to know on how did you come to know that Yadavs have been overrepresented in the Uttar Pradesh police. And lastly, if you see the current and previous records of the recruitment ( the recent recruitment lists are available ), there is no evidence that Yadavs were selected more under the Samajwadi Government. Please elaborate. Far from average (talk) 04:17, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Sources :


 * 1) https://www.indiatoday.in/magazine/special-report/story/19941015-mulayam-uses-casteist-politics-to-establish-his-influence-at-grassroots-in-up-809789-1994-10-15
 * 2) http://www.firstpost.com/politics/yadavisation-of-up-cops-why-akhilesh-wont-act-on-law-and-order-1575823.html
 * 3) https://www.thequint.com/news/india/kurmis-and-yadavs-in-india-a-deeply-entrenched-fight-for-identity
 * 4) http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/36-pc-of-new-up-police-recruits-were-yadavs/226720/
 * 5) https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/mandal-commission-onc-reservation-hindutva-christophe-jaffrelot-6564735/ (Christophe Jaffrelot, French political scientist)
 * 6) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4411386
 * 7) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4410963
 * 8) https://www.jstor.org/stable/4405949

"there is no evidence that Yadavs were selected more under the Samajwadi Government", doesn't even matters. Read the above articles. -- Eatcha 04:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

In fact there are more articles at https://www.jstor.org/action/doBasicSearch?Query=Yadavisation -- Eatcha 04:56, 17 June 2021 (UTC)