User talk:Eatprayswimm

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 21:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Misleading Userboxes & Icons
Hi, Please refrain from putting twinkle/rollbacker/file mover/reviewer userboxes/icons to your userpage as you don't have them so thus it's misleading,

You only add the icons/userboxes once you actually have the rights,

Thank you, – Davey 2010 Talk 01:55, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Your recent editing history at Taylor Lianne Chandler shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. slakr \ talk / 05:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Note
--Neil N  talk to me 17:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
A kitten for you and your hard work.

Allaboutjane8181 (talk) 04:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC) 