User talk:EauGallie

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - FieldMarine (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Melbourne Beach, Florida
Greetings, I added a reference to the landing site of Juan Ponce de Leon as Ponce de León Island. Please see discussion page here to state you views before reverting this edit which contains a ref. Thanks. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree with the re-wording of the article. I will not be making any more changes at the time.  EauGallie (talk) 19:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

We could use some help on Florida articles with some local editors. Let me know if interested & I would be happy to make some suggestions. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring
You appear to be edit warring over the inclusion of a link to Ponce de León Island in the Melbourne Beach, Florida article. You have reverted on the Melbourne Beach article two times today. The three-revert rule states, "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation." Please keep this in mind. The proper means for dealing with this dispute is to discuss it on the article talk page. I would further urge you to not revert again, even if you have not reached the three-revert limit, as admins have latitude to block for edit warring, even if the three-revert rule technically has not been broken. -- Donald Albury 18:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)