User talk:Eazyetron

Speedy deletion nomination of The Scenes (Irish band)
Hello Eazyetron,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Scenes (Irish band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amitbanerji26 (talk) 05:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to California high school basketball championship has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: California high school basketball championship was changed by Eazyetron (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975423 on 2016-06-05T07:20:53+00:00.

AfC notification: Draft:Emirates Flight 449 has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Emirates Flight 449. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:55, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emirates Flight 449 (August 18)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MRD2014 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Emirates Flight 449 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emirates_Flight_449 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MRD2014&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Emirates_Flight_449 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— MRD2014 ( talk ) ( contribs ) 23:54, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Emirates Flight 449


Hello, Eazyetron. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Emirates Flight 449".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 22:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Persky
The L.A. Times story says, if you read it, that the county Registrar of Voters said only a fraction of the submitted signatures needed to be counted in order to certify the issue for it to be placed on the ballot. The sense of that statement should not be deleted and it's not sensationalistic at all. If you can come up with better language to capture the intent of the source, feel free to do so, but don't delete it because you don't like it. Activist (talk) 08:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Important notice regarding all edits relating to living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles
Neutralitytalk 05:14, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for 60 hours given your vandalism and disruptive editing at Aaron Persky. Vandalism is never tolerated, but especially not tolerated in articles on living persons. See WP:BLP. You made disruptive edits to this article on January 25, June 1, and June 6, and have received the official alert above, so please consider this a "last chance" with respect to our policies and guidelines in this area. Neutralitytalk 05:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Liz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Killing of George Floyd have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 03:41, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Derek Chauvin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 09:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

If you make another similar request, the block will be lengthened and your access to this page removed. 331dot (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 04:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please stop making threats against other editors. Liz Read! Talk! 04:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Derek Chauvin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 07:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Derek Chauvin ‎. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —Bagumba (talk) 07:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.