User talk:Ebbillings

Welcome!

 * Hello,, and thank you for the welcome. I'm not exactly a new Wikipedia editor, but I have had a recent surge in editing activity. Did I do something wrong to bring myself to your attention? I already take care to do most of the things you suggested (e.g. making edit summaries, signing talk page posts). Ebbillings (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for your feedback on Death of Dan Markingson. My collaborator and I will try to follow your suggestion in August or September. Saenger (talk) 12:32, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Ebbillings! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:22, Thursday, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

Scott Meyer (ice hockey)
Before you you put too much effort into that article, you should know that he does meet any of the presumed notability criteria listed in WP:NHOCKEY. From the sources he is listed in are all either stats pages (which give no notability for WP:GNG) or are WP:ROUTINE sources (non-independent, primary, or local coverage). He needs at least two reliable independent secondary sources to WP:GNG and I have found none. Yosemiter (talk) 14:19, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, . However, as far as I can tell, Meyer does meet WP:NHOCKEY criterion number three four, as he was named to the NCAA Division I All-American Second Team in 2001. I did quite a bit of searching to find that fact before I decided to proceed with improving the article. (I've also included a sentence and reference for that fact in the article.) If I am misunderstanding or misinterpreting something, please let me know. ebbillings (talk) 14:37, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Meyer was also named to the All-WCHA First Team in that same season, which also fulfills criterion number four. ebbillings (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Once I saw the NCAA Second Team, I started looking into it and it does (I was under the impression only First Team qualified) and was about to remove the Prod tag but you beat me to it. However, the WCHA First does not qualify, it must be NCAA Div I All American for criterion #4. Although he does meet the lowest standard for presumed notability, have you actually found any WP:GNG sources? NHOCKEY is for presumed notability, but does not guarantee it, the subject MUST still pass GNG. Yosemiter (talk) 15:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton has been accepted
 Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 08:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Ninetieth_Minnesota_State_Senate_v._Dayton help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

DYK for Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton
Gatoclass (talk) 01:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Psalm Wooching
Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  00:01, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Peter Malcolm) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Peter Malcolm, Ebbillings!

Wikipedia editor Barkeep49 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Crazy that there are two RUGBY people with this name."

To reply, leave a comment on Barkeep49's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:37, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * , I promise that I'm not seeking these out on purpose in the course of my page creations, but two rugby union people named Paddy Ryan, born within two years of each other! (Plus, several other Paddy Ryans!) ebbillings (talk) 19:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Surrrrre you're not. That's what they all say :). I've go ahead and reviewed and removed the tag on 1990 Paddy Ryan. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rugby United New York has been accepted
 Rugby United New York, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:57, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Rugby_United_New_York help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

A page you started (Dylan Audsley) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Dylan Audsley, Ebbillings!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"A well-written article."

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States national rugby union players, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Observatory Park ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_United_States_national_rugby_union_players check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_United_States_national_rugby_union_players?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World Rugby Americas Pacific Challenge logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:World Rugby Americas Pacific Challenge logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Charles Austin (rugby union)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Charles Austin (rugby union).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 02:21, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Perhaps not to late to say Happy 2019! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 2110 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:52, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bill King (rugby league)
Hello Ebbillings,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Caorongjin and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Bill King (rugby league) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Caorongjin (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Roland Blase) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Roland Blase.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 01:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Alex Maughan) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Alex Maughan.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 01:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Devereaux Ferris) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Devereaux Ferris.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 01:37, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Mow Mitchell) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mow Mitchell.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 05:02, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

The article Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 05:21, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

The article Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of DannyS712 -- DannyS712 (talk) 17:21, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: GABgab 19:20, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
I see you recently accepted a pending change to September 1 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

The article is very well written; most of my edits were to improve wording or to avoid repetition.

Best of luck moving forward with the FA process.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:06, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Cardiff Arms Park
You have previously edited Cardiff Arms Park. An editor has decided to split the article (yet again). I would like to know your view on the new edit....see Talk:Cardiff_Arms_Park. Seth Whales  talk  20:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)