User talk:Ebengeer

Inconsistant treatment of gCalcD by Ebengeer
All graphing calculators are of general use (that's obvious, as you can see from the list of  General Purpose Calculators, i.e., the list had already contained the other graphing calculators ). If you were consistant you would have moved the other graphing calculators from the General Purpose category. PrfMath (talk) 16:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparison of online calculators


The article Comparison of online calculators has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This is a mere list of external links - it has no sources independent of the article subject(s) and so does not meet the general notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 22:54, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Comparison of online calculators for deletion
The article Comparison of online calculators is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Comparison of online calculators until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MrOllie (talk) 19:05, 14 January 2011 (UTC)