User talk:Eblem/Archive 1

Eblem (talk) 16:56, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Block Appeal
Block Appeal


 * I have contacted the blocking admin to ascertain his view. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, let's review. "The original block was bogus."  Looking back, it looks like you were making personal attacks on other users, and then you uploaded a bunny Hitler image.   What exactly do you want to accomplish here if you're unblocked?  NawlinWiki (talk) 20:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Six years later I am not in a position to completely reconstruct the events. Any image I uploaded was on my own page, but you did not respond then to me when I pointed it out. What exactly do you want to accomplish by continuing the block?

eblem (talk)
 * Six years ago, you were angry at Wikipedia and its administrators. It looks like nothing has changed - you feel like you did nothing wrong and that we're still the bad guys.  If you can't articulate what you want to do constructively here, or give any indication that you're not here just to continue attacking people, I'm not comfortable agreeing to an unblock.  NawlinWiki (talk) 16:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

NawlinWiki (talk)

So, your position is that you can read minds and have a firm grasp of my internal state then and now. You want a detailed summary of every edit I might ever make should the block be lifted, and figure six years is not enough punishment, you favor a death sentence.

I think you've made my case for me.

Eblem (talk) 15:44, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

I would also point out that NawlinWiki is using permanent blocking to effectively accomplish banning, and I am not the only recipient of this treatment by NawlinWiki.

The Wikipedia Blocking policy clearly states:

Blocks should not be punitive

Blocks should not be used:

1.in retaliation against users; 2.to disparage other users; 3.as punishment against users; 4.or where there is no current conduct issue of concern.

After six years there is clearly no current conduct issue of concern.

Eblem Eblem (talk) 20:04, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Chummer, all he did is ask you what sort of constructive edits you would be making (albeit in a fashion more argumentative than anyone would like). All you have to do is honestly answer the question and the admins will decide to unblock based off of your answer. Simple as that. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:17, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

If I make any edits, they will be of the very highest constructive quality.

I may not make any edits at all.

Eblem (talk) 20:34, 4 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Unblocked, see above. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:42, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

All you had to do is wait six years and grovel before the almighty NawlinWiki.

He's well known for this sort of crap.

190.60.59.216 (talk) 23:46, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Eblem, you ought to read NawlinWiki's talk page. Apparently Anthony Bradbury doesn't consider you "an asset to the project". Arbitrary nonsense like this leaves Wikipedia mired in mediocrity and run by obsessive-compulsive pinheads with egos the size of North America.

89.28.101.245 (talk) 12:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)