User talk:Ebony Jackson

False statement about a rng homomorphism?
The article Rng (algebra) contains the evidently false statement
 * If R and S are rings, a rng homomorphism f: R → S whose image contains a non-zero-divisor maps 1R to 1S.

A relevant diff is. I'm not sure of the intent of including the statement. If I were to correct it without removing it, I would change it to "... whose image does not contain a non-zero-divisor ...". —Quondum 16:04, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I think that the statement is actually true. If the image of f contains a non-zerodivisor s, then f(r) = s for some r in R, and then f(1_R) s = f(1_R) f(r) = f(1_R r) = f(r) = s = 1_S s, and cancelling the non-zerodivisor s shows that f(1_R) = 1_S.  One could argue about whether such a statement is notable enough to be included in the article, however. Ebony Jackson (talk) 19:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I was getting confused by terminology that I know well enough for it to feel familiar so that I don't look closely, but which is rusty enough for me that I get it wrong. I was unthinkingly interpreting "non-zero-divisor" as "non-zero zero-divisor".
 * To me, it feels out of place to be drawing attention to properties of an identity element in an article about rngs, at least where the relation to rings is not being explored more generally. In this context, an identity element of a subrng is in effect merely "the biggest idempotent of that subrng".  —Quondum 20:42, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I guess you could try deleting the sentence, and see if anyone complains. I think it was not I who added the sentence originally. Ebony Jackson (talk) 21:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Wow, it goes a way back:, it seems, though it was since sharpened. —Quondum 21:58, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

An AfD of possible interest to you
In Articles for deletion/2 × 2 real matrices, there is a mention of the thread that you have opened in Talk:Real projective line. You may be interested to contribute there. D.Lazard (talk) 11:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Set (mathematics)
Hello! I have a short question for you: what is the intended readership of Wikipedia articles about mathematics, in your view? Is it mathematicians? --Jonathan G. G. Lewis 01:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It depends on the article. If it is an article on an advanced topic such as Perfectoid space, then the article should be aimed mainly at mathematicians and mathematics students, because those are the groups of people who are likely to be reading such an article, and because an article that truly tried to explain it to non-mathematicians would be far too long.  For more elementary topics, such as Set (mathematics), the article should be written at different levels - part of it should be written for a very broad audience, and part of it should be aimed at readers with more background, but as with all mathematics, what is most important is that explanations be correct and not vague. Ebony Jackson (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's stated Policies and guidelines start with being clear, and avoid esoteric terms. The next guideline is to be concise as possible, but not overly concise. It seems a shame to limit readership to mathematicians, who should already know all this content anyway. --Jonathan G. G. Lewis 23:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Column vector
Do you agree with the change in definition of a column vector as a "column of entries" instead of a $$n\times 1$$ matrix? Madyno (talk) 21:52, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I think it is worth mentioning both, so I edited Row and column vectors to reflect this. Ebony Jackson (talk) 02:46, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)