User talk:Ebony de Zoot

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Olav Anton Thommessen - Læreren som ikke ble.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Olav Anton Thommessen - Læreren som ikke ble.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Dorothy Parker does not have an edit summary.&#32;Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 22:47, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Ralph P. Locke moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ralph P. Locke, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Java Hurricane  17:55, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ralph P. Locke


Hello, Ebony de Zoot. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ralph P. Locke".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:15, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Can you help me improve Draft: Edward Green
Hello, and Happy Holidays! I noticed that you have greatly improved the article on Marcus Paus and I wondered if you might be able to offer me some feedback as to why my article on Edward Green (whose interview of Marcus Paus you referenced) was declined. The reason given was "Not Resume" but I notice the editor who declined it also cut most of the musicology, so I am really not clear about why this was declined and would appreciate anything you've learned working on the Marcu Paus article that might help. Then I will also ask at the Teahouse. Thanks in advance.Trouver (talk) Trouver (talk) 18:46, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The articles for creation process is really not the best way to create an article for an experienced editor. The outcomes of the review process tend to be quite arbitrary. Given your account age and edit count, you should be able to create articles directly, which is the normal way to do it for experienced editors. --Ebony de Zoot (talk) 12:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)