User talk:Ec5618/Technical

 Please do not edit this page. This subpage is where I keep all things relating to the technical operation of Wikipedia. For anything else, please see my main talk page. Thank you.

VFD
You didn't put your Vfd nomination in the right position. It belongs in the Vfd log, not in the page of the previous Vfd. Georgia guy 23:45, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Ah, right. Nice bot. -- Ec5618 23:54, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

Yonatan Abramski
Hi - I speedy-deleted this page, because it's a recreation of the page deleted through VfD a few months ago. I think it would be okay to remove the entry from VfD, since it's already resolved. Thanks for catching this. CDC  (talk)  16:40, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Association of American Feed Control Officials"
A page you created, Association of American Feed Control Officials, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

TFD
I'm assuming that this is a honest mistake, but please be careful about erasing other people's votes. Yours, Radiant_* 12:09, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing that. It's odd though, these votes were all put in while I was editing the page, but no 'Edit conflict' was reported. Still, thanks. -- Ec5618 13:30, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Linkimage
Template:Linkimage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 22:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Creationism2
Template:Creationism2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Neelix (talk) 20:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Galileo Satellite System.jpg
As of 19 May 2005, all images which are "non-commercial only" are to be deleted on sight. The image above will be deleted unless a case for fair-use is asserted. ed g2s &bull; talk  16:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

PUI
The procedure at pui is After 15 days in phase 1, move images to phase 2 and add unverifedimage to the caption of images I think that means you have to edit all the pages that the image appears on. Did you do this when you moved images a few days ago? Zeimusu | (Talk page) 14:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I have now. -- Ec5618

PUI procedure
When an image is moved from Phase I to Phase II, please only place the unverified image thing on the article and leave the stuff on the image page itself. The extra edit in history confuses me when I go to delete them and is unnecessary. Cheers. Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 23:36, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Image:Galileo Satellite System.jpg
I tagged your image Image:Galileo Satellite System.jpg by tag. Please add required information. --RuM 16:21, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I have noted that the image was released by ESA. -- Ec5618 11:40, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject Usability
Hi, I've recently created a Usability WikiProject. The intent is to make Wikipedia easier and more pleasant to use by encouraging things like accessibility, Cross-browser support, standardized templates, and so on. I noticed some of your comments on Template talk:Cleanup, and thought that you may be interested. –MT 30 June 2005 06:31 (UTC)

WP:ASK
Stare as I might I can't seem to find: Search Wikipedia using the box to the left. Is it possible that some of us using different skins than you would need to look up or for that matter look down for our search box? At the very least please remove this inaccuracy. You may note that this page has been edited to by many others before you took notice. The consensus seems suggest as simple a page as possible to increase the liklihood of the neophyte user reading it at all. Please be courteous and read what has gone on before you impose your own wisdom without discussion. Thanks, --hydnjo talk 22:14, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You're quite right. Luckily, most new users use the standard skin, and most others are not so easily stumped by a displaced searchbox and will happen upon it on further inspection of the layout. So I'm sure this misunderstanding has not caused too many people grief. I'm sorry for my tone, it just seems to flow naturally. After all, you reverted my edits because of a problem you could have easily fixed.
 * I've changed the wording, both here and in the RD header (I'm sure you'll have noticed that the same error is printed there, to confuse and misdirect). -- Ec5618 22:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * No, I never did notice that in the RD header! And from personal experience a new user will often just use whatever skin his parents are logged in with. Because we have no minimum age or IQ to participate we are doomed and will always get seemingly silly and frequent homework questions. ASK was originally intended to do a triage between RD and HD. The idea was to as simply as possible direct traffic to the correct one of those two places. We felt that the most effective way to do that was to aim at the least literate and most impatient new user by using as few words as reasonable. Lots of additions and subtractions have edited their way through ASK and I'm only asking the original concept of HD vs RD be kept in mind. -- hydnjo talk 23:17, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Also, I'm gettin' dizzy goin' back and forth between here and there. I'm just going to take a piece of the prior paragraph and post it there for reference re the genesis. Regards, --hydnjo talk 23:31, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * In triage, wounds that require no medical assistance are turned away, leaving the patients to heal naturally.
 * In the spirit of triage, surely we should try to discern between relevant questions, and questions that are best taken care of by the user. I'm quite happy to keep to original concept of ASK in mind. -- Ec5618 23:22, 18 October 2005 (UTC)


 * As will always be the case with analogies at some point they fail. Anyway, fair enough. I have no problem with your trying to raise the question quality. Again, regards. --hydnjo talk 00:08, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

template:limitedgeographicscope
Reverting the image, not the template.

The image it was using is a strange alteration from the original image. &brvbar; Reisio 15:24, 2005 July 10 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Ec5618 11:40, August 8, 2005 (UTC)

Template:Cleanup
There. I got the best of both worlds by using the Qif template to determine the size of the icon. If the template is only two lines, the icon is reduced, but if the template has three lines, the icon is full-size. ;)

Denelson83 10:25, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm starting to really like this qif-template. Oh, I don't suppose you could do the same for
 * Template:Cleanup-remainder
 * Template:Cleanup-section -- Ec5618 10:33, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Double Categories
OK, I see what you were doing now. I thought it was more deletionism, which I found very surprising, considering it was you. My apologies. FeloniousMonk 16:57, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Category filing
Hi. You appear to be slightly confused about how category filing works in Wikipedia: this edit certainly doesn't do what your edit summary would imply you think it does. The default filing by the article name lists the article under the "R" section of the category and would file it after "Red" but before "Rfd" if such articles existed. The suffix means that it would be filed after a separate "Red Wizards" article, but as there isn't one of those (it's a pointless redirect at the moment), this isn't an issue. By filing it as "* Red Wizards", you are causing the article to be listed at the start of the category, which is a place reserved for the most important article(s) about each topic. You could specify the sort key as "Red Wizards", but as noted above this is a non-issue. Please read and review WP:CAT. I will revert your edit. Cheers --Pak21 12:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Reference Desk
Please do not bite the newbies at the RD, there's no call for either the "dead question" box or posting anonymous IP addresses there. Poorly formatted anonymous questions are welcome, even if they can become frustrating. &mdash; Lomn | Talk / RfC 13:58, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Why not? I'm sorry, but if you take a look at the top of each page, you'll find instructions on hoow to use this page. Unless observation of these rules is somehow encouraged, this page will continue to be an embarassment to WIkipedia.
 * The concept of a Reference desk is brilliant, but allowing non-questions such as "enviroment and its relation with geography" is ridiculous and does not appear professional. Questions such as "How does a barometer work?" are atleast phrased properly, although the user clearly did not read the instructions either. And please, if you disagree, discuss the matter on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk. -- Ec5618 15:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Why do you keep removing my question? Why is it a 'vandal question' to ask if maxwell house is instant coffee?--4.237.23.16 19:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Perhaps the question is not so much vandalous, as some of your answers have been. Suggesting people tumble dry their harddisks is not helpful. -- Ec5618 19:28, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Somehow I suspect the person asking that question was some what less than serious--4.237.23.16 20:12, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I was about to ask you to stop biting the newbies, Ec, but it seems someone else has beaten me to it.  Read WP:BITE. Whilst many of the questions are badly writen, and often indecipherable, please consider that many of them may have been written by people who do not have English as their first language, or who may be very young.  The 'embarrassment' to Wikipedia would be if people are turned away from this excellent and free encyclopaedia by flippant or brusque attitudes to - what appears to them - a perfectly honest question.  'Do your own homework' is a good response to what is obviously a homework question, but it does no harm to offer a pointer or two in addition. Proto t c 12:25, 26 October 2005 (UTC)


 * No kidding. If you can't be civil, then don't even bother. You're not helping anyone when you do things like that -- not Wikipedia, not the Reference Desk, not the people who are asking the questions, not the other people who are willing to actually try and help people with the questions rather than telling them how to sign their comments (which is almost completely unnecessary on there, mind you). Knock it off already.--Fastfission 02:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

Language reference desk
Hi, please don't remove unanswered questions from WP:RD/L. Thanks! --Angr/undefined 21:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Reference desk
Do we really need that extra page? We have one already at Reference desk/How to ask and answer :-) Do you have another idea in mind? --HappyCamper 23:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
 * You're quick. Please see the relevant Talk page. I am trying to modify the ask a question link, so that it will explain the rules to the users. They will then be able to review the rules, while thinking of their question. -- Ec5618 00:02, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

Removal of images from geo stubs
Why have you removed all the images from geo stubs? There is no explanation of your edits on Talk pages.--Mais oui! 20:04, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm not exactly sure. I've seen these silly icons adorn stub messages for a while now, and I may have snapped. In my understanding, stub images hurt performance and serve no useful purpose. Or rather, most serve no purpose, such as images of a Canadian flag in an article about a Canadian region. The article quite clearly mentions that its topic is Canadian, so the image does not clarify anything.
 * Still, this sort of discussion should probably have preceded my edits. Nonetheless, I hope we can resolve this peacefully and quickly, because every time I experience lag on Wikipedia I am aggressively reminded of these superfluous images.
 * (Obviously I hate images in signatures as well, and would support a set of signatures from which users could choose). -- Ec5618 20:35, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Also, take a look at WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals regarding not using includeonly for the categories on stub templates, but instead using |* to sort the template to the beginning of the category. Also, the new image server should help alleviate some of the lag from images... --Mairi 05:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Stub templates
Hi - please NEVER EVER use "noinclude" on stub templates! It is vital for stub sorters to be able to tell at a glance whether templates have been correctly formatted, i.e., whether they hav a correctly named companion category. With noinclude this is impossible. I have reverted several of the Canadian province geo-stub categories you have done this with - what other templates have you altered in this way? Grutness...wha?  10:36, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Don't worry - I think I've got them all. Please don't do that again! (and please don't remove the icons, either - since the MW1.5 upgrade there don't seem to be the old server problems, so they're back in use - and are much appreciated by editors, by all accounts). Grutness...wha?  10:50, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

Cons
See, Naming conventions (fauna). Sea lion should be at the lowercase since it is about a genus. --Peta 10:36, 29 November 2006 (UTC)