User talk:Ecao03249

October 2013
Hello, I'm Antiqueight. An edit that you recently made to Erica seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!   &#127866;  Antiqueight  confer 22:57, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Erica. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Erica was changed by Ecao03249 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900781 on 2013-10-23T23:00:12+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:00, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Erica with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 23:02, 23 October 2013 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 23:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)