User talk:Eceresa

This was discussed on AN here. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Unblocked
Hi Eceresa, you were unfortunately caught up in a hardblock of because it was an open proxy. They're usually hardblocked because they're often used abusively. This IP seems to be a poorly configured proxy since it still has several open ports. However, none of them seem to be useable anymore, so I've unblocked it. Hopefully the school's IT department will eventually fix this. Spellcast (talk) 16:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Josh White, Jr.
A tag has been placed on Josh White, Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rnb (talk) 17:11, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Rename at Campaign for "santorum" neologism
Hello, since you recently participated in an RfC at Campaign for "santorum" neologism, I thought you might be interested in this proposal for renaming the article, or perhaps another of the rename proposals on the page. Best, Be— —Critical  22:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)