User talk:Echaruhas/sandbox

Evaluation of an article: Population Fragmentation: This article appears to be a start to a good wiki article because the heading is clear and right away the article gives a definition of population fragmentation. The coverage is neutral and there are clear headings for each different part. There are also multiple reliable sources listed, making this article a good one.

Brendan's Review
As far as it goes for the first source you have listed I would agree that it doesn't seem to be the most reliable. For now though, if it does have the proper information on it then I would add the citation just to make sure that others can trace that information to somewhere else. Another editor may decide if it's credible or not but for now I would just add the citation in so it's there. I to forget how to do some of the things we need to know on here like adding citations and creating subtitles and stuff like that but I usually just go back to the training module things and find the one I need. That would be my advice for how to add the citations in. With the addition of info on Carl Linnaeus, I would leave out adding to much in. I would only add the information that is relevant to your article. If it hasn't been done already, you could set up the link on his name so that when people click on it they are transferred over and can read about him but I wouldn't worry about adding to much on him for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwhitney670 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 17 March 2018 (UTC)