User talk:EchetusXe/Archive 2023

Happy New Year, EchetusXe!


Happy New Year! EchetusXe, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 04:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 04:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruben Wyatt


The article Ruben Wyatt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence found of notability, no independent indepth reliable sources about the player (just database entries)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ayo Lekuti


The article Ayo Lekuti has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence found of any notability, just databases and sources which aren't independent (e.g. from the team)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brad Smith-Howes


The article Brad Smith-Howes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of any notability, only independent source is one line in a local newspaper, and nothing better (or much at all) found online."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kai O'Keeffe


The article Kai O'Keeffe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No notability found online, and one independent source in the article is one line in a local newspaper."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jack Connor (footballer, born 2003)


The article Jack Connor (footballer, born 2003) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence found of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kai O'Keeffe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kai O'Keeffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kai O'Keeffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Brad Smith-Howes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brad Smith-Howes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brad Smith-Howes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 08:19, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ayo Lekuti for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayo Lekuti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ayo Lekuti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ruben Wyatt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruben Wyatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ruben Wyatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 08:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cody Johnson (footballer)


The article Cody Johnson (footballer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No secondary independent sources at all, let alone the SIGCOV SIRS required for athlete bios"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelleJay (talk) 03:02, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Harvey Watts


The article Harvey Watts has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not contain any secondary independent sources at all, let alone the required SIGCOV in SIRS for athlete bios"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoelleJay (talk) 03:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Harvey Watts moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Harvey Watts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Short descriptions
Hi there. I see you're a quite prolific article creator. Good work! Could you please include short descriptions when creating articles? They usually come in this format:, so nationality – if it's not ambiguous – and date of birth.

I've been going through hundreds of articles where short descriptions were missing and it would be nice if no new articles would crop up without short descriptions. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 00:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay 👌 EchetusXe 06:27, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Great. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 09:49, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
 Wishing EchetusXe a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you.--EchetusXe 14:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Stats updates
Please can you use five tildes to update the date, rather than making it up, like you did here? GiantSnowman 22:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

New York Law School
Hi EchetusXe, it's nice to meet you. I have a pending update request at Talk:New York Law School and thought you might be willing to take a look given your interest in higher education. I look forward to your thoughts! Ariel at NYLS (talk) 15:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter Kelly (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter Kelly (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter Kelly (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Albert Pynegar
Please don't keep reverting edits without discussion or different references. Where is the disagreement regarding the table on this reference?

https://www.11v11.com/players/albert-pynegar-47392/

1920-21	LC	League Division Two	13	 6

1921-22	LC	FA Cup	            3	 1

1921-22	LC	League Division Two	15	 3

1922-23	LC	FA Cup	            1 1922-23	LC	League Division Two	14	11

1923-24	CC League Division Two	16	 9

1923-24	LC	League Division Two	 3 1924-25	CC FA Cup	             2

1924-25	CC League Division Two	37	17

LC - league total appearance = 45, league total goals = 20

CC - league total appearance = 53, league total goals = 26

Officially Mr X (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * In the article's stats table sourced from the English National Football Archive. Leicester City 1923–24 and Coventry City 1923–24 & 1924–25 are the differences. I don't see why we would go with the 11v11.com source when that makes no mention of his stats at Oldham Athletic, Port Vale, Chesterfield or Rotherham United.--EchetusXe 17:19, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Well I didn't even know about the English National Football Archive - it's hard to verify when this site is hidden behind a paywall... Officially Mr X (talk) 18:06, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

It has stats for every match in Football League history, with players having complete stats (for the Football League). It's I think a £30 a year subscription. EchetusXe 20:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete page
Hello,

My name is Victor Nirennold and I recently came across a roadblock in regards to my job search. I have been trying to delete my Wikipedia page, but unfortunately, my request has not been granted. I never created this page about myself, but it has been causing me more harm than good: Victor Nirennold

As a retired professional football player, I have transitioned into a completely different field. However, recruiters continue to bring up my Wikipedia page during job interviews, holding onto the stereotypes of professional athletes not being the smartest. It has been frustrating, as I have tried to remove any trace of my previous career online, but this page remains.

I am kindly reaching out to you as a moderator, to ask for your assistance in deleting my Wikipedia page. If there is another person or forum I should direct my request to, please let me know. I hope you understand the reasons behind my request. Thank you in advance for your help.

Best regards,

Victor Nirennold Robinho35 (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OTRS.--EchetusXe 09:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Victor Nirennold for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victor Nirennold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Victor Nirennold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robinho35 (talk) 14:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Norman Whiteside
Norman Whiteside has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Iazyges  Consermonor   Opus meum  20:59, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Dean Smith statistics
Hi, with the links from Dean Smith's career statistics, I feel like it would be better to have the link take you somewhere similar to the page that would be created, and as these pages currently don't exist, it is more helpful for the general public that use Wikipedia. Also, I don't think these pages will be created any time soon, as for example; with Leyton Orient, multiple seasons pages don't exist (2018–19, 2017–18 and 2006–07 onwards), so I feel like the season's pages in which Dean Smith played for the club will not exist for a while, which is why I linked it elsewhere, if you could provide me a better explanation, I am happy accept your edits. Thanks, MessiIsMyBezzie (talk) 17:19, 12 May 2023 (UTC) Hi, I'll just quote from red link: "remove red links if and only if Wikipedia should not have an article on the subject". A Walsall / Hereford / Leyton Orient fan will come along eventually and make these articles.--EchetusXe 17:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kai O'Keeffe
Hello, EchetusXe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kai O'Keeffe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Harvey Watts


Hello, EchetusXe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Harvey Watts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:58, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kai O'Keeffe


Hello, EchetusXe. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kai O'Keeffe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Wragg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Wragg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Wragg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Gabriel Billington for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Billington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gabriel Billington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:57, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Harrison King for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harrison King is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harrison King until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mitch Beardmore for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitch Beardmore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mitch Beardmore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:03, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe O'Connor (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe O'Connor (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe O'Connor (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robby.is.on (talk) 09:06, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Association football culture
Hello, some user want to delete Commemoration Section. in the Association football culture

If you have spare time, Please participate in the discussion at the WikiProject Football Footwiks (talk) 13:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Advice for Hartlepool United F.C.
Hello, I've recently proposed the Hartlepool United F.C. page for good article status but wondered if I could have some advice before the review. For the club record goalscorer, different sources give the record to different people. For example, the club website gives the record to Joshie Fletcher (111), whereas In The Mad Crowd has Johnny Wigham and Ken Johnson (106) as the record holders. What would you suggest in this scenario? All the best Michaeldble (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Michaeldble (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * In The Mad Crowd shows Joshie Fletcher with 121 goals, presumably the club website goes off his North-Eastern League + FA Cup goals, leaving out his West Hartlepool CC Medal and Durham County Cup goals. I don't know why In The Mad Crowd would miss him off their scoring chart when they have his stats, but there he is with 111 league and FA cup goals so I'd say it's safe to go with him as the top-scorer.--EchetusXe 00:05, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Excellent! Thank you very much Michaeldble (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Funso Ojo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Funso Ojo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DreamRimmer -- DreamRimmer (talk) 14:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Chris Herd
Loan (sports) is linked to a title parameter in a citation, but there's a URL-wikilink conflict and this page is already linked at the first mention. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 09:48, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * ahh, thank you, some of those sentence-like reference titles can get pretty confusing.--EchetusXe 09:54, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gavin Massey
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gavin Massey you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 1TWO3Writer -- 1TWO3Writer (talk) 07:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gavin Massey
The article Gavin Massey you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gavin Massey and Talk:Gavin Massey/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 1TWO3Writer -- 1TWO3Writer (talk) 13:21, 6 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Finished the review. Please take a look, especially what I said under Colchester United. 123Writer talk 17:57, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Anton Forrester
Free transfer (association football) is linked to a title parameter in a citation, but there's a URL-wikilink conflict and I don't see this phrase anywhere on this page. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 23:56, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Oops, thanks again.--EchetusXe 14:23, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gavin Massey
The article Gavin Massey you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Gavin Massey for comments about the article, and Talk:Gavin Massey/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of 1TWO3Writer -- 1TWO3Writer (talk) 04:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Club season page
Hello, You wrote on Leeds season page topic that season pages defaults change and there is no consistency. I am trying to work on current and past season pages for a Ukrainian club. Can you please give an example of a completed season page that is considered best? I looked at MoS page, and at numerous pages for major clubs. The pages have so many differences. I want to look at what is considered best example and follow that. Thank you for your time. Ceriy (talk) 18:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I tried to keep the Port Vale season articles consistent from 1888–89 to 2022–23. The 2022–23 article is broadly what you want. The text is essential, it shouldn't be just a load of stats. Prose is necessary, so are results tables and appearance data. Transfer tables, scoring lists, disciplinary tables are good to include. All of those things should be fairly easy to source. Oh, there weren't any awards last season but 2021–22 has a section for end of season club awards. If you look at 2022–23 Arsenal F.C. season then that is 473k and has 730 references, which is insane. Better to stick with the essential stuff and keeping on top of that rather than having too much detail Once you've got it set up that you can just update it with each result, a sentence or two of prose as the results/appearance table etc gets updated.--EchetusXe 19:25, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will look over those pages. I did a few season articles a long time ago, but they are wrong, only statistics no text and I will fix them. I began making an article last year in my sandbox, but its not finished. This is 2023-24 season. I tried to follow Chelsea and Arsenal pages. But they are different from what others are doing. I want to work out how to have a correct page for this season, then work on old seasons. Can you please tell me if I have any issues with it? Ceriy (talk) 19:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * That all seems perfectly fine. Personally I'd say there's no need to separate the transfer section into summer and winter and it doubles the amount of sub sections. As I said, the Arsenal article is excessive, so you'll just go nuts trying to keep up with something like that. Best to just concentrate on adding to the prose so that all the stats have meaning to them.--EchetusXe 20:03, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Pound Sterling
Hi - just wondered if you have consensus for the mass linking of £ to Pound Sterling? Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Consensus with who? Looking at today's featured article though, there isn't a link for the £ used in the article, so on balance it would probably be safe to say they're be needed, so I'll stop adding them in now.--EchetusXe 10:58, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Funso Ojo
The article Funso Ojo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Funso Ojo and Talk:Funso Ojo/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DreamRimmer -- DreamRimmer (talk) 09:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
 * EchetusXe, I had planned on signing up as a reviewer after the page got deleted, but it was picked up by LunaEatsTuna before i could. In the meantime I noted a few points. Hopefully you could use them to improve the article:
 * A couple of lines about his birth and early life wouldn't hurt the article, if the information is available.
 * The 125,000 price/cost seems to be an estimate, according to one source. You should clarify the sentence to reflect that. This is also mentioned in the lead section.
 * There are a few sentences with a lot of sub-clauses. I suggest that you split them.
 * Happy editing! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay thanks!--EchetusXe 10:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Funso Ojo
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Funso Ojo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 02:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Funso Ojo
The article Funso Ojo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Funso Ojo and Talk:Funso Ojo/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 20:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Funso Ojo
The article Funso Ojo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Funso Ojo for comments about the article, and Talk:Funso Ojo/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Gavin Massey
Z1720 (talk) 12:02, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Funso Ojo
—Kusma (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Keegan Hartley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keegan Hartley, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Keegan Hartley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Newspaper archives
Hello. I must take those health issue things down, they don't really apply any more.

A lot of papers in the 1920s and 1930s did season previews each August, either in detail for their local clubs or a couple of paras and a squad list with height/weight/birthplace/position for each club in the league. I'd been doing Darlington player heights in the 1930s from the Newcastle Evening Chronicle, and then that stopped in favour of a season preview in their Sunday paper, but the poor quality reproduction made it unusable, so I searched for Darlington height in August 1936, and it came up with the Sunday Pictorial 16-page special.

If you're after bios, you'll get some detail on a player when they change club, and if you're lucky, you'll find interview-type features on really quite minor players long after their playing days. Don't think there's any specific advice about how to search, it's the same then as now. If you're after someone specific, search for them by name, restrict the search by time or area of the country or specific paper, obviously it helps if their name isn't Smith or similar. The Athletic News was good, but that stopped in about 1930. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 19:24, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Andy Smith (footballer, born 1980)
Hello, what was the reason you reverted my edit? Coaching history listing was according to the info already existing in the article? Syvä-äksy (talk) 12:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, there was an edit conflict that I had to resolve. You found the Slovakian management spell, which I have added into the article, so thanks for the edits they were very useful. The management career section of the infobox isn't for coach spells, they're just for manager spells. Thanks.--EchetusXe 12:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay. I was just going to add more info and sources for the Slovak spell but you did it already. Thanks too! Syvä-äksy (talk) 12:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hyphenation
Hi, regarding your recent changes to the use of hyphens in articles, please note that hyphens should be used in compound adjectives that appear before a noun (so "youth-team player" would be preferred to "youth team player"). This gives a bit more detail on the appropriate use of hyphens. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi, right so "the youth team" there is no hyphen, but "a youth-team player" is hyphenated. Okay, that makes it a bit more complicated then. EchetusXe 17:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * That's right, and these grammatical variances mean that using a script to make these changes is pretty much impracticable. Bear in mind, also, that adverbs ending in -ly shouldn't be hyphenated (so, for example, "newly promoted club" shouldn't have a hyphen), see here. Isn't grammar fun :-| Mattythewhite (talk) 17:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's at least a simple enough rule to remember. I tried getting the script to change newly to newly- and it kept correcting itself, so that's how I discovered that grammar rule. EchetusXe 18:01, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Help with Anthony Crowell's article
Hi again, EchetusXe. Thanks for your previous help with the changes to New York Law School. I'd be grateful for your assistance with a few requested changes I recently posted on the Anthony Crowell article as well. Appreciate your time and implementation, Ariel at NYLS (talk) 15:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I can't see any recent edits? EchetusXe 16:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the confusion. You should now be able to see my recent request on the article talk page. Thanks again for your assistance. Ariel at NYLS (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello again, . I recently posted a request for a few more content updates in Crowell's article. I'd be very grateful if you'd take a look and make these additions as well. Your continued assistance is greatly appreciated. Ariel at NYLS (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Done! EchetusXe 23:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Robot Wars (TV series) presenters has been nominated for deletion
Category:Robot Wars (TV series) presenters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- wooden superman  08:54, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Singleton


A tag has been placed on Harry Singleton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Harry Singleton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Singleton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harry Singleton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)