User talk:Echo2019a

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Glasgow Times, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glasgow Times. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Killing of George Floyd has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:59, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Killing of George Floyd was changed by Echo2019a (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866452 on 2020-10-07T20:59:23+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Killing of George Floyd. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Zocke1r (talk) 21:14, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Holman (footballer)


A tag has been placed on Harry Holman (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SixulaTalk 23:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Billy Reid
No, it just means your stub lacked important things like an infobox and categories... GiantSnowman 16:36, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Roger Hunt
Roger Hunt wasn't ever knighted, so his name isn't Sir Roger Hunt. As it says in the article: He continued to be known as "Sir" Roger Hunt by the Liverpool supporters, despite the absence of a formal knighthood. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Brian Laundrie
HI. Please stop removing Brian Laundrie from the October 2021 list of deaths. At least until one month has passed - if he has not generated an article of his own or recieved substantial bio through redirect by that time, he can be removed as per the norm at the project. In the very unlikely event that his actual date of death becomes confirmed, he can be moved from his "(death announced on this date)" position to that actual date. Thanks. Ref (chew) (do) 21:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deaths in 2021. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. You were asked nicely above, but you continue to remove him, therefore you now receive a vandalism warning. --Marbe166 (talk) 22:56, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 3RR+? Why have you continued to remove Brian Laundrie when it has clearly been explained why he is logically included in Deaths in October 2021? You are only allowed three reverts under the rules, so I suggest you desist right now. Ref (chew) (do) 23:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Yet another revert. Please read and follow what the editors above said. Nukualofa (talk) 17:37, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * And another identical removal today. Reversed on the basis of what has been explained to you as clearly as possible and on more than one occasion. You do need to stop. Ref (chew) (do) 19:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of George Floyd. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 21:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Keir Starmer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Czello 23:43, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny


A tag has been placed on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny


Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles - The Canine Mutiny, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;Mainframe98 talk 18:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 18:19, 6 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Donnelly (footballer)


The article Robert Donnelly (footballer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Article fails GNG. I can't find much significant coverage on this player. He played a season and a half with Clyde but never attracted much media attention."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

Block evasion
This user evaded their block as in December, 2022. -- Yamla (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)